动物福利认证印章及其对品牌资产的影响——鸡肉商品的消费者视角

Gabriel Gaiato, Carlos Marcelo Ardigó, P. F. Limberger
{"title":"动物福利认证印章及其对品牌资产的影响——鸡肉商品的消费者视角","authors":"Gabriel Gaiato, Carlos Marcelo Ardigó, P. F. Limberger","doi":"10.1080/10454446.2023.2227583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyze how consumer perception of the animal welfare (AW) certification seal impacts brand equity (BE). It was conducted in two stages: a causal (experimental) research with a 2x2 design involving two scenarios and two brands, and a descriptive stage exploring the relationships between variables, such as prior knowledge about AW and BE, and BE and price. The sample included 334 Brazilian consumers of chicken breast fillet, randomly assigned to either a Control Group (CG) without the AW certification seal or an Experimental Group (EG) with the seal. The t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used in the respective stages. The results revealed that the presence of the AW certification seal did not have a positive impact on BE across brands. However, considering different levels of consumer knowledge about AW, higher knowledge was associated with greater BE. Plausible explanations for the findings include low consumer awareness, understanding, confusion, and skepticism regarding the authenticity of the seal, suggesting directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":15827,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","volume":"29 1","pages":"197 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animal Welfare Certification Seal and the Effect on Brand Equity: Consumer Perspective of Chicken Commodity\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Gaiato, Carlos Marcelo Ardigó, P. F. Limberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10454446.2023.2227583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyze how consumer perception of the animal welfare (AW) certification seal impacts brand equity (BE). It was conducted in two stages: a causal (experimental) research with a 2x2 design involving two scenarios and two brands, and a descriptive stage exploring the relationships between variables, such as prior knowledge about AW and BE, and BE and price. The sample included 334 Brazilian consumers of chicken breast fillet, randomly assigned to either a Control Group (CG) without the AW certification seal or an Experimental Group (EG) with the seal. The t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used in the respective stages. The results revealed that the presence of the AW certification seal did not have a positive impact on BE across brands. However, considering different levels of consumer knowledge about AW, higher knowledge was associated with greater BE. Plausible explanations for the findings include low consumer awareness, understanding, confusion, and skepticism regarding the authenticity of the seal, suggesting directions for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Products Marketing\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"197 - 218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Products Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2023.2227583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Products Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2023.2227583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在分析消费者对动物福利认证印章的认知如何影响品牌资产。它分两个阶段进行:一个是涉及两个场景和两个品牌的2x2设计的因果(实验)研究,另一个是探索变量之间关系的描述性阶段,如关于AW和BE的先验知识,以及BE和价格。样本包括334名巴西鸡胸肉消费者,他们被随机分配到没有AW认证印章的对照组(CG)或有印章的实验组(EG)。在各个阶段使用t检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果显示,AW认证印章的存在对各品牌的BE没有产生积极影响。然而,考虑到消费者对AW的了解程度不同,了解程度越高,BE越大。对这些发现的合理解释包括消费者对印章真实性的认识、理解、困惑和怀疑,为未来的研究提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Animal Welfare Certification Seal and the Effect on Brand Equity: Consumer Perspective of Chicken Commodity
ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyze how consumer perception of the animal welfare (AW) certification seal impacts brand equity (BE). It was conducted in two stages: a causal (experimental) research with a 2x2 design involving two scenarios and two brands, and a descriptive stage exploring the relationships between variables, such as prior knowledge about AW and BE, and BE and price. The sample included 334 Brazilian consumers of chicken breast fillet, randomly assigned to either a Control Group (CG) without the AW certification seal or an Experimental Group (EG) with the seal. The t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used in the respective stages. The results revealed that the presence of the AW certification seal did not have a positive impact on BE across brands. However, considering different levels of consumer knowledge about AW, higher knowledge was associated with greater BE. Plausible explanations for the findings include low consumer awareness, understanding, confusion, and skepticism regarding the authenticity of the seal, suggesting directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: From food promotion and advertising through new food product development and consumer behavior research, the Journal of Food Products Marketing provides timely, practical articles that keep food marketers on the cutting edge of their profession. The journal includes refereed research studies as well as opinions, guidelines, and speeches by practitioners that contribute to the better practice and understanding of food marketing. The journal provides a single forum for both food marketing academicians and food marketing practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Food Safety Risk and Visual Attention: The Moderating Effect of Prototype Perception and Social Distance Meatless Revolution: Exploring Consumers’ Perception of Meat Alternatives Cheers! Examining Message Congruency Effects for No/low-Alcohol Beer Nutritional Profile and consumers’ Perceptions of Cereal Bars Organic Honey - Comparison of Generational Behaviour and Consumption Trends After Covid-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1