权力与力量:重新思考平民主义时代的koj、阿伦特和加缪

Q4 Arts and Humanities Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-19 DOI:10.24917/20841043.10.1.3
Maciej Kałuża
{"title":"权力与力量:重新思考平民主义时代的koj<s:1>、阿伦特和加缪","authors":"Maciej Kałuża","doi":"10.24917/20841043.10.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the presented essay, I would like to focus on the relationship between force and power. The idea that power, without resorting to forceful, even violent solutions, is less problematic, is both deceitful and dangerous. Once accepted, it can cause an oversight of violence ‐free but possibly harmful forms of power. My focus in the article will be on the two reinterpretations of Master ‐Slave dialectics, as presented by Alexandre Kojève and Albert Camus. This will be pre‐ sented with reference to the position of Hannah Arendt and her remarks on power and force. In conclusion, I will be abstemious: my goal is rather to diagnose and bind the existentialist judgement with the contemporary situation and suggest that thinking outside the force ‐power relationship may be continuously fruitful and an important part of reflection on the nature of","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"41-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power and force: Rethinking Kojève, Arendt and Camus in the populist era\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Kałuża\",\"doi\":\"10.24917/20841043.10.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the presented essay, I would like to focus on the relationship between force and power. The idea that power, without resorting to forceful, even violent solutions, is less problematic, is both deceitful and dangerous. Once accepted, it can cause an oversight of violence ‐free but possibly harmful forms of power. My focus in the article will be on the two reinterpretations of Master ‐Slave dialectics, as presented by Alexandre Kojève and Albert Camus. This will be pre‐ sented with reference to the position of Hannah Arendt and her remarks on power and force. In conclusion, I will be abstemious: my goal is rather to diagnose and bind the existentialist judgement with the contemporary situation and suggest that thinking outside the force ‐power relationship may be continuously fruitful and an important part of reflection on the nature of\",\"PeriodicalId\":30403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"41-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我想把重点放在力量和权力之间的关系上。认为不诉诸武力、甚至暴力解决方案的权力问题更少,这种想法既具有欺骗性,也很危险。一旦被接受,它可能会导致对暴力的监督——没有暴力,但可能有害的权力形式。我在这篇文章中的重点将放在亚历山大·科约和阿尔贝·加缪对主从辩证法的两种重新解释上。这将参考汉娜·阿伦特的立场和她对权力和力量的评论来呈现。总之,我将是有节制的:我的目标是诊断并将存在主义的判断与当代形势联系起来,并建议在力量-权力关系之外的思考可能会不断取得成果,并且是对事物本质反思的重要组成部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power and force: Rethinking Kojève, Arendt and Camus in the populist era
In the presented essay, I would like to focus on the relationship between force and power. The idea that power, without resorting to forceful, even violent solutions, is less problematic, is both deceitful and dangerous. Once accepted, it can cause an oversight of violence ‐free but possibly harmful forms of power. My focus in the article will be on the two reinterpretations of Master ‐Slave dialectics, as presented by Alexandre Kojève and Albert Camus. This will be pre‐ sented with reference to the position of Hannah Arendt and her remarks on power and force. In conclusion, I will be abstemious: my goal is rather to diagnose and bind the existentialist judgement with the contemporary situation and suggest that thinking outside the force ‐power relationship may be continuously fruitful and an important part of reflection on the nature of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Argument  Biannual Philosophical Journal
Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anil Seth, Being you. A new science of consciousness A revitalisation of virtue ethics in contemporary education Synkretyczne pouczenie jogiczne w Ćarakasanhicie (Śarirasthana 1.137–155) Geistlosigkeit. Reflexionen zur Aktualität von Søren Kierkegaards Konstruktion des Selbst im Spannungsfeld von Immanenz und Transzendenz Dharmarāja and Dhammarāja (II)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1