多元文化教育与ESEA: 1965-2015年间政策调整的起伏

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Multicultural Education Review Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/2005615X.2023.2164964
Neisha Terry
{"title":"多元文化教育与ESEA: 1965-2015年间政策调整的起伏","authors":"Neisha Terry","doi":"10.1080/2005615X.2023.2164964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since its ratification in 1965, the ESEA and its reauthorizations have shaped educational policy and funding in the US. However, while the ESEA has been positioned as a fundamental system of educational governance to ensure quality in the nation’s education system, it has been criticized for inconsistent support of diversity and the promotion of Americanization. This article utilizes discourse analysis methodology to analyse several key iterations of the ESEA through the lens of critical multicultural education to examine the policy’s commitment to the multicultural education agenda over that of the goal of Americanization. Findings reveal that the commitment to multicultural education has vacillated over time, and Americanization still influences policy framing. Recommendations include employing a critical approach by promoting meaningful inclusion of multiple stakeholders to interrogate and dismantle the conservative foundation upon which the US education system is built.","PeriodicalId":43845,"journal":{"name":"Multicultural Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicultural education and the ESEA: the ebbs and flows of policy alignment between 1965-2015\",\"authors\":\"Neisha Terry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2005615X.2023.2164964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since its ratification in 1965, the ESEA and its reauthorizations have shaped educational policy and funding in the US. However, while the ESEA has been positioned as a fundamental system of educational governance to ensure quality in the nation’s education system, it has been criticized for inconsistent support of diversity and the promotion of Americanization. This article utilizes discourse analysis methodology to analyse several key iterations of the ESEA through the lens of critical multicultural education to examine the policy’s commitment to the multicultural education agenda over that of the goal of Americanization. Findings reveal that the commitment to multicultural education has vacillated over time, and Americanization still influences policy framing. Recommendations include employing a critical approach by promoting meaningful inclusion of multiple stakeholders to interrogate and dismantle the conservative foundation upon which the US education system is built.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multicultural Education Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multicultural Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2023.2164964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multicultural Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2023.2164964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自1965年批准以来,ESEA及其重新授权影响了美国的教育政策和资金。然而,尽管ESEA一直被定位为确保国家教育体系质量的基本教育治理体系,但它因不支持多样性和促进美国化而受到批评。本文利用话语分析方法,通过批判性多元文化教育的视角,分析了ESEA的几个关键迭代,以检查该政策对多元文化教育议程的承诺,而不是美国化的目标。研究结果表明,对多元文化教育的承诺随着时间的推移而摇摆不定,美国化仍然影响着政策框架。建议包括采用一种批判性的方法,促进多方利益相关者的有意义的包容,以质疑和拆除美国教育体系赖以建立的保守基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicultural education and the ESEA: the ebbs and flows of policy alignment between 1965-2015
ABSTRACT Since its ratification in 1965, the ESEA and its reauthorizations have shaped educational policy and funding in the US. However, while the ESEA has been positioned as a fundamental system of educational governance to ensure quality in the nation’s education system, it has been criticized for inconsistent support of diversity and the promotion of Americanization. This article utilizes discourse analysis methodology to analyse several key iterations of the ESEA through the lens of critical multicultural education to examine the policy’s commitment to the multicultural education agenda over that of the goal of Americanization. Findings reveal that the commitment to multicultural education has vacillated over time, and Americanization still influences policy framing. Recommendations include employing a critical approach by promoting meaningful inclusion of multiple stakeholders to interrogate and dismantle the conservative foundation upon which the US education system is built.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multicultural Education Review
Multicultural Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Multicultural Education Review (MER) is a peer-reviewed journal for research about diversity and equity in education. Aiming to provide a truly international and multidisciplinary forum for the discussion of educational issues, MER welcomes original contributions that explore various aspects of policy and practice in education around the world. As an official scholarly journal of the Korean Association for Multicultural Education, MER is published in March, June, September, and December.
期刊最新文献
Understanding early childhood stakeholders’ beliefs and experiences with discipline using virtual learning labs Intercultural relations and trust in schools: perceptions of immigrant families in the city of Barcelona Intercultural understanding: implications for multicultural education Representations of cultural diversity in music education textbooks: a critical and comparative analysis Well-being among Arab teachers in Israel during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1