流动土地:转让模式——不同背景

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES History of the Family Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1081602X.2022.2058980
Janine Maegraith, Margareth Lanzinger
{"title":"流动土地:转让模式——不同背景","authors":"Janine Maegraith, Margareth Lanzinger","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2022.2058980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Social and economic historical research has repeatedly shown that the buying and selling, transferring, and rearranging of pieces of land can be identified as various modes of dealing with land in many European regions from the Middle Ages onward. Land was therefore mobile. Furthermore, recent empirical studies have evidenced the existence of ‘land markets’ since the Middle Ages – not only in wine-growing areas or in regions with partible inheritance but also in agricultural areas with impartible inheritance. However, they also show that the definition of the ‘market’ needs broadening in order to incorporate the different modes of transfer and the various actors involved. The many forms of property exchanges, the underlying assemblage of property and land use rights, and the existence and definition of land markets are much debated topics in economic and social history. These debates differ in terms of chronology and how they define land markets and property rights: should analysis distinguish between commercial property transfers and those that can be placed within kin relations? In other words, do we understand premodern land markets in a more comprehensive way and allow for the entanglements between commercial and kin-related property exchanges? This Special Issue argues in favour of such a perspective. The introduction provides a framework to the five contributions to this special issue, which make use of multiple approaches and analyse specific legal spaces in view of land transactions and their legal, social, and economic embeddedness. Here, we discuss methodological challenges, especially the use of sources and data, present some of the main findings of the papers, and conclude with implications and questions for future research on property transfers and markets.","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"27 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile land: modes of transfer – varieties of contexts\",\"authors\":\"Janine Maegraith, Margareth Lanzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1081602X.2022.2058980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Social and economic historical research has repeatedly shown that the buying and selling, transferring, and rearranging of pieces of land can be identified as various modes of dealing with land in many European regions from the Middle Ages onward. Land was therefore mobile. Furthermore, recent empirical studies have evidenced the existence of ‘land markets’ since the Middle Ages – not only in wine-growing areas or in regions with partible inheritance but also in agricultural areas with impartible inheritance. However, they also show that the definition of the ‘market’ needs broadening in order to incorporate the different modes of transfer and the various actors involved. The many forms of property exchanges, the underlying assemblage of property and land use rights, and the existence and definition of land markets are much debated topics in economic and social history. These debates differ in terms of chronology and how they define land markets and property rights: should analysis distinguish between commercial property transfers and those that can be placed within kin relations? In other words, do we understand premodern land markets in a more comprehensive way and allow for the entanglements between commercial and kin-related property exchanges? This Special Issue argues in favour of such a perspective. The introduction provides a framework to the five contributions to this special issue, which make use of multiple approaches and analyse specific legal spaces in view of land transactions and their legal, social, and economic embeddedness. Here, we discuss methodological challenges, especially the use of sources and data, present some of the main findings of the papers, and conclude with implications and questions for future research on property transfers and markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of the Family\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of the Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2058980\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2058980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要社会和经济历史研究一再表明,从中世纪开始,在许多欧洲地区,买卖、转让和重新整理土地可以被视为处理土地的各种模式。因此,土地是流动的。此外,最近的实证研究证明,自中世纪以来,“土地市场”的存在——不仅在葡萄酒种植区或具有可分割遗产的地区,而且在具有可分割继承权的农业地区。然而,它们也表明,“市场”的定义需要扩大,以纳入不同的转移模式和所涉及的各种行为者。在经济和社会史上,许多形式的财产交换、财产和土地使用权的潜在组合以及土地市场的存在和定义都是备受争议的话题。这些争论在时间顺序以及如何定义土地市场和产权方面有所不同:分析是否应该区分商业财产转让和可以置于亲属关系中的转让?换言之,我们是否更全面地理解前现代土地市场,并考虑到商业和亲属财产交换之间的纠缠?本期特刊支持这种观点。引言为这一专题的五项贡献提供了一个框架,这些贡献利用了多种方法,并从土地交易及其法律、社会和经济嵌入性的角度分析了特定的法律空间。在这里,我们讨论了方法上的挑战,特别是来源和数据的使用,介绍了论文的一些主要发现,并总结了对未来房地产转让和市场研究的启示和问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobile land: modes of transfer – varieties of contexts
ABSTRACT Social and economic historical research has repeatedly shown that the buying and selling, transferring, and rearranging of pieces of land can be identified as various modes of dealing with land in many European regions from the Middle Ages onward. Land was therefore mobile. Furthermore, recent empirical studies have evidenced the existence of ‘land markets’ since the Middle Ages – not only in wine-growing areas or in regions with partible inheritance but also in agricultural areas with impartible inheritance. However, they also show that the definition of the ‘market’ needs broadening in order to incorporate the different modes of transfer and the various actors involved. The many forms of property exchanges, the underlying assemblage of property and land use rights, and the existence and definition of land markets are much debated topics in economic and social history. These debates differ in terms of chronology and how they define land markets and property rights: should analysis distinguish between commercial property transfers and those that can be placed within kin relations? In other words, do we understand premodern land markets in a more comprehensive way and allow for the entanglements between commercial and kin-related property exchanges? This Special Issue argues in favour of such a perspective. The introduction provides a framework to the five contributions to this special issue, which make use of multiple approaches and analyse specific legal spaces in view of land transactions and their legal, social, and economic embeddedness. Here, we discuss methodological challenges, especially the use of sources and data, present some of the main findings of the papers, and conclude with implications and questions for future research on property transfers and markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.
期刊最新文献
Trends in assortative mating in the United States, 1700-1910. Evidence from FamiLinx data. Children as pawns on the national Chess board: children in Israel’s 1948 war of Independence Dangerous liaisons, or strategies for family management in eighteenth-century Venice Varieties of egalitarianism: gender ideologies in the late socialism of the German Democratic Republic Hurricanes, fertility, and family structure: a study of early 20th century Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1