大气颗粒物元素分析技术发展评述

IF 11.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00155
Monika Ogrizek , Ana Kroflič , Martin Šala
{"title":"大气颗粒物元素分析技术发展评述","authors":"Monika Ogrizek ,&nbsp;Ana Kroflič ,&nbsp;Martin Šala","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Among all environmental pollutants, particulate matter (PM) poses the major threat to our health. These tiny airborne particles vary in shape and composition, which is reflected in their hazardous potential. The particles are small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, causing severe diseases. Therefore, their regular monitoring is required. Toxic metals and other elements are often measured by regulatory agencies as well as in research laboratories, either to compare ambient concentrations with prescribed limit values or to study provenance of air pollution sources in order to target PM pollution mitigation strategies. The most established method for the determination of regulated Pb, Cd, As, Ni and other elements in PM is microwave digestion inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MW/ICPMS), whereas X-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques have also often been used, especially in research. In this review paper we critically assess these two and three other analytical techniques (<em>i.e.,</em> LA-ICPMS, PIXE and INAA) for element determination in PM deposited on filter media. All aspects from sample treatment to measurement range and limitations, costs and waste management are considered. In conclusion we identify XRF and LA-ICPMS as two promising surface techniques for the analysis of a PM deposit on a filter, which could replace the laborious wet MW/ICPMS method, which is – considering its wide use, very incriminating to the environment. In short, EDXRF is the cheapest, simplest for use and already customized for PM samples, whereas LA-ICPMS is promising, but still needs some development in the direction of autosamplers and matrix-matched standards for calibration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article e00155"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000022/pdfft?md5=732e53e85895e53bfc2d72f35cf06d9f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214158822000022-main.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical review on the development of analytical techniques for the elemental analysis of airborne particulate matter\",\"authors\":\"Monika Ogrizek ,&nbsp;Ana Kroflič ,&nbsp;Martin Šala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teac.2022.e00155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Among all environmental pollutants, particulate matter (PM) poses the major threat to our health. These tiny airborne particles vary in shape and composition, which is reflected in their hazardous potential. The particles are small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, causing severe diseases. Therefore, their regular monitoring is required. Toxic metals and other elements are often measured by regulatory agencies as well as in research laboratories, either to compare ambient concentrations with prescribed limit values or to study provenance of air pollution sources in order to target PM pollution mitigation strategies. The most established method for the determination of regulated Pb, Cd, As, Ni and other elements in PM is microwave digestion inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MW/ICPMS), whereas X-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques have also often been used, especially in research. In this review paper we critically assess these two and three other analytical techniques (<em>i.e.,</em> LA-ICPMS, PIXE and INAA) for element determination in PM deposited on filter media. All aspects from sample treatment to measurement range and limitations, costs and waste management are considered. In conclusion we identify XRF and LA-ICPMS as two promising surface techniques for the analysis of a PM deposit on a filter, which could replace the laborious wet MW/ICPMS method, which is – considering its wide use, very incriminating to the environment. In short, EDXRF is the cheapest, simplest for use and already customized for PM samples, whereas LA-ICPMS is promising, but still needs some development in the direction of autosamplers and matrix-matched standards for calibration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000022/pdfft?md5=732e53e85895e53bfc2d72f35cf06d9f&pid=1-s2.0-S2214158822000022-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158822000022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在所有环境污染物中,颗粒物(PM)对我们的健康构成了主要威胁。这些微小的空气颗粒在形状和成分上各不相同,这反映在它们的危险潜力上。这些颗粒小到足以深入肺部,甚至进入血液,导致严重的疾病。因此,需要对其进行定期监测。有毒金属和其他元素通常由监管机构和研究实验室测量,目的是将环境浓度与规定的极限值进行比较,或研究空气污染源的来源,以便制定PM污染缓解战略。微波消解电感耦合等离子体质谱法(MW/ICPMS)是测定PM中受调控的Pb、Cd、As、Ni等元素最成熟的方法,而x射线荧光(XRF)技术也经常被使用,特别是在研究中。在这篇综述文章中,我们批判性地评估了这两种和其他三种分析技术(即LA-ICPMS, PIXE和INAA)用于过滤介质沉积的PM中的元素测定。从样品处理到测量范围和限制,成本和废物管理的所有方面都被考虑在内。总之,我们确定XRF和LA-ICPMS是两种有前途的表面技术,用于分析过滤器上的PM沉积物,它们可以取代费力的湿式MW/ICPMS方法,考虑到其广泛使用,对环境非常有害。简而言之,EDXRF是最便宜的,使用最简单的,并且已经为PM样品定制了,而LA-ICPMS很有前途,但仍需要在自动进样器和矩阵匹配标准的方向上进行一些开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical review on the development of analytical techniques for the elemental analysis of airborne particulate matter

Among all environmental pollutants, particulate matter (PM) poses the major threat to our health. These tiny airborne particles vary in shape and composition, which is reflected in their hazardous potential. The particles are small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, causing severe diseases. Therefore, their regular monitoring is required. Toxic metals and other elements are often measured by regulatory agencies as well as in research laboratories, either to compare ambient concentrations with prescribed limit values or to study provenance of air pollution sources in order to target PM pollution mitigation strategies. The most established method for the determination of regulated Pb, Cd, As, Ni and other elements in PM is microwave digestion inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MW/ICPMS), whereas X-ray fluorescence (XRF) techniques have also often been used, especially in research. In this review paper we critically assess these two and three other analytical techniques (i.e., LA-ICPMS, PIXE and INAA) for element determination in PM deposited on filter media. All aspects from sample treatment to measurement range and limitations, costs and waste management are considered. In conclusion we identify XRF and LA-ICPMS as two promising surface techniques for the analysis of a PM deposit on a filter, which could replace the laborious wet MW/ICPMS method, which is – considering its wide use, very incriminating to the environment. In short, EDXRF is the cheapest, simplest for use and already customized for PM samples, whereas LA-ICPMS is promising, but still needs some development in the direction of autosamplers and matrix-matched standards for calibration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.
期刊最新文献
Green chemistry-based strategies for liquid-phase microextraction and determination of mercury species Analytical methodologies for the determination of phthalates in environmental matrices Microplastics and nanoplastics in groundwater: Occurrence, analysis, and identification Evaluation of European watch list contaminants in environmental matrices and microplastics: Analytical strategies, mechanisms of adsorption and occurrence Pharmaceuticals and micro(nano)plastics in the environment: Sorption and analytical challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1