“汇率”而不是智力交流

Q2 Arts and Humanities Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.3167/ds.2020.240107
Baudry Rocquin
{"title":"“汇率”而不是智力交流","authors":"Baudry Rocquin","doi":"10.3167/ds.2020.240107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The newly found exchange of letters between Marcel Mauss and Victor Branford dated 1926 testifies to the active exchanges between both their traditions. Durkheimian sociology owed a great deal to the Branford-Geddes network of colleagues across the Channel, not less than a funding of the republication of their iconic journal, the Année sociologique. On the other hand, Branford was far from apologetic about his own tradition of thought and even went as far as to criticize the Institut Français de Sociologie in the 1920s. All this shows the enduring links between both countries in the field of sociology, contrary to what has often been held.","PeriodicalId":35254,"journal":{"name":"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes","volume":"24 1","pages":"86-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Rates of Exchange' Rather than Intellectual Exchanges\",\"authors\":\"Baudry Rocquin\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/ds.2020.240107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The newly found exchange of letters between Marcel Mauss and Victor Branford dated 1926 testifies to the active exchanges between both their traditions. Durkheimian sociology owed a great deal to the Branford-Geddes network of colleagues across the Channel, not less than a funding of the republication of their iconic journal, the Année sociologique. On the other hand, Branford was far from apologetic about his own tradition of thought and even went as far as to criticize the Institut Français de Sociologie in the 1920s. All this shows the enduring links between both countries in the field of sociology, contrary to what has often been held.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"86-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2020.240107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2020.240107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最新发现的1926年马塞尔·毛斯和维克托·布兰福德之间的信件往来证明了他们两个传统之间的积极交流。涂尔干社会学在很大程度上要归功于海峡对岸的Branford Geddes同事网络,这不亚于他们的标志性期刊《Année socialogique》的再版资金。另一方面,布兰福德对自己的思想传统一点也不道歉,甚至在20世纪20年代批评了法国社会学研究所。所有这些都表明了两国在社会学领域的持久联系,这与人们通常认为的相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Rates of Exchange' Rather than Intellectual Exchanges
The newly found exchange of letters between Marcel Mauss and Victor Branford dated 1926 testifies to the active exchanges between both their traditions. Durkheimian sociology owed a great deal to the Branford-Geddes network of colleagues across the Channel, not less than a funding of the republication of their iconic journal, the Année sociologique. On the other hand, Branford was far from apologetic about his own tradition of thought and even went as far as to criticize the Institut Français de Sociologie in the 1920s. All this shows the enduring links between both countries in the field of sociology, contrary to what has often been held.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes
Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crime et religion chez Durkheim From Durkheim to Jellinek ‘La justice est pleine de charité’, ou la ‘révélation’ d'Émile Durkheim vue par Gaston Richard Émile Durkheim et la sociologie des religions Il faut traiter les faits religieux comme des choses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1