Débora Miranda Diogo Stabille , Augusto Diogo Filho , Beatriz Lemos da Silva Mandim , Lúcio Borges de Araújo , Priscila Miranda Diogo Mesquita , Miguel Tanús Jorge
{"title":"植入硬膜外导管用于术后镇痛的定植频率和分离细菌","authors":"Débora Miranda Diogo Stabille , Augusto Diogo Filho , Beatriz Lemos da Silva Mandim , Lúcio Borges de Araújo , Priscila Miranda Diogo Mesquita , Miguel Tanús Jorge","doi":"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 68 cultured catheters, 6 tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45<!--> <!-->h (18-118) (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Sphingomonas paucimobilis</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100199,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","volume":"65 3","pages":"Pages 200-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frecuencia de colonización y bacterias aisladas de punta de catéter epidural implantado para analgesia postoperatoria\",\"authors\":\"Débora Miranda Diogo Stabille , Augusto Diogo Filho , Beatriz Lemos da Silva Mandim , Lúcio Borges de Araújo , Priscila Miranda Diogo Mesquita , Miguel Tanús Jorge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 68 cultured catheters, 6 tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45<!--> <!-->h (18-118) (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> and <em>Sphingomonas paucimobilis</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 200-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bjanes.2014.05.006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Edicion en Espanol)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255496315000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:随着硬膜外置管镇痛使用的增加,需要证明这种方法的安全性,并了解硬膜外置管术后定殖的发生率,以及导致这种定殖的细菌。方法对2011年11月至2012年4月择期硬膜外置管维持患者术后镇痛进行评价。收集导管尖端进行半定量和定性微生物学分析。结果68根培养导管中6根(8.8%)培养阳性。无患者发生浅表或深部感染。平均导管使用时间为43.45 h (18-118) (P = .0894)。手术类型(污染或未污染)、患者身体状况和手术时间与导管定植无关。从导管尖端分离到的微生物有金黄色葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和少动鞘单胞菌。结论在本研究条件下,外科病房患者术后硬膜外导管镇痛的细菌定植风险较低。
Frecuencia de colonización y bacterias aisladas de punta de catéter epidural implantado para analgesia postoperatoria
Objectives
The increased use of epidural analgesia with catheter leads to the need to demonstrate the safety of this method and know the incidence of catheter colonization, inserted postoperatively for epidural analgesia, and the bacteria responsible for this colonization.
Methods
From November 2011 to April 2012, patients electively operated and maintained under epidural catheter for postoperative analgesia were evaluated. The catheter tip was collected for semiquantitative and qualitative microbiological analysis.
Results
Of 68 cultured catheters, 6 tips (8.8%) had positive cultures. No patient had superficial or deep infection. The mean duration of catheter use was 43.45 h (18-118) (P = .0894). The type of surgery (contaminated or uncontaminated), physical status of patients, and surgical time showed no relation with the colonization of catheters. Microorganisms isolated from the catheter tip were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sphingomonas paucimobilis.
Conclusion
Postoperative epidural catheter analgesia, under this study conditions, was found to be low risk for bacterial colonization in patients at surgical wards.