{"title":"美国公立学校K-12年级LGBTQ教育者经验与LGBTQ课程研究的系统回顾","authors":"Melissa A. Antonelli, Sabrina F. Sembiante","doi":"10.1080/2005615X.2022.2087031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This systematic review of literature was conducted to understand (a) acronym usage to define LGBTQ educators and curriculum, (b) theoretical frameworks and research designs of studies investigating LGBTQ educator perspectives, (c) the barriers, supports, and benefits identified by LGBTQ educators (i) in including LGBTQ topics into the curriculum and (ii) regarding their disclosure decisions. Of the 12 studies reviewed, patterns emerged in the prevalence of Queer theory as a guiding theoretical lens, narrative and case study approaches to inform investigations into lived experiences, and cross-study concurrence around fear of disclosure and self-censorship. Recommendations for future research include streamlining inconsistencies in LGBTQ acronym definitions, diversifying samples away from predominantly White/Caucasian gay and lesbian educator samples, increasing transgender, queer, questioning and bisexual perspectives, and studying impacts of LGBTQ curricular inclusion.","PeriodicalId":43845,"journal":{"name":"Multicultural Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of research on LGBTQ educators’ experiences and LGBTQ curriculum in K-12 U.S. public schools\",\"authors\":\"Melissa A. Antonelli, Sabrina F. Sembiante\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2005615X.2022.2087031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This systematic review of literature was conducted to understand (a) acronym usage to define LGBTQ educators and curriculum, (b) theoretical frameworks and research designs of studies investigating LGBTQ educator perspectives, (c) the barriers, supports, and benefits identified by LGBTQ educators (i) in including LGBTQ topics into the curriculum and (ii) regarding their disclosure decisions. Of the 12 studies reviewed, patterns emerged in the prevalence of Queer theory as a guiding theoretical lens, narrative and case study approaches to inform investigations into lived experiences, and cross-study concurrence around fear of disclosure and self-censorship. Recommendations for future research include streamlining inconsistencies in LGBTQ acronym definitions, diversifying samples away from predominantly White/Caucasian gay and lesbian educator samples, increasing transgender, queer, questioning and bisexual perspectives, and studying impacts of LGBTQ curricular inclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multicultural Education Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multicultural Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2022.2087031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multicultural Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2022.2087031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review of research on LGBTQ educators’ experiences and LGBTQ curriculum in K-12 U.S. public schools
ABSTRACT This systematic review of literature was conducted to understand (a) acronym usage to define LGBTQ educators and curriculum, (b) theoretical frameworks and research designs of studies investigating LGBTQ educator perspectives, (c) the barriers, supports, and benefits identified by LGBTQ educators (i) in including LGBTQ topics into the curriculum and (ii) regarding their disclosure decisions. Of the 12 studies reviewed, patterns emerged in the prevalence of Queer theory as a guiding theoretical lens, narrative and case study approaches to inform investigations into lived experiences, and cross-study concurrence around fear of disclosure and self-censorship. Recommendations for future research include streamlining inconsistencies in LGBTQ acronym definitions, diversifying samples away from predominantly White/Caucasian gay and lesbian educator samples, increasing transgender, queer, questioning and bisexual perspectives, and studying impacts of LGBTQ curricular inclusion.
期刊介绍:
Multicultural Education Review (MER) is a peer-reviewed journal for research about diversity and equity in education. Aiming to provide a truly international and multidisciplinary forum for the discussion of educational issues, MER welcomes original contributions that explore various aspects of policy and practice in education around the world. As an official scholarly journal of the Korean Association for Multicultural Education, MER is published in March, June, September, and December.