论态度与诗学的分界(以果戈理的婚姻为例)

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17223/24099554/17/10
Alexander I. Ivanitskiy
{"title":"论态度与诗学的分界(以果戈理的婚姻为例)","authors":"Alexander I. Ivanitskiy","doi":"10.17223/24099554/17/10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gogol’s works are very promising for the demarcation between the author’s attitude and the text’s idea and poetics that, usually, successively generate one another. However, Gogol’s attitude came from the archaic and normally could not become the text’s idea - including the motif of a marriage threat. In Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka and Viy, this motif was part of the depicted folklore world and, thanks to it, was detached from the author. The motif spawns new ties between attitude, idea, and poetics in the comedy Marriage (1833, 1842). Here idea (satire on marriage-related estate swagger) is formally given, and so the motif of marriage threat (shown in Podkolesin’s indecision) goes beyond it and approves itself by contradiction. Kochkarev shows unconsciously in his praise of women the infinity of their bodies as the archaic background of Podkolesin’s attraction to and fear of marriage. This infinity comes from the Slavic belief that during menses the female body ties the people’s world with the underground world of the dead and the infinity of the Earth. The kinship between the woman and the animal, which is constantly voiced in the comedy, makes marriage shameful and transforms its diabolic symbolism into “devil’s laughter”. Placing the story of the failed marriage in the “non-Russian” Petersburg world (perceived by the Russian folk mind as a realized chimera), Gogol gives the hidden explanation of his fear of women personified in Podkolesin. At the very beginning of the comedy, the invasion of the real world by the chimeric one is manifested in “new mirrors” that show people their caricatures. The character’s obscene language is the sign of his high position in society (it is legitimated by the “sodomic” names); lies become an unconscious replacement of the truth, and the hyperbole approves the opposite. Zhevakin and Kochkarev reflect the succession of the archaic and laughter worlds in Marriage. The former represents the “alive deceased” and an old-Russian beggar; the latter a joker and a devil-matchmaker. The explicit and banal “idea” in Marriage is the starting point for the poetical expression of Gogol’s attitude. However, personifying it in the comical hero, who lives in a comical world, Gogol, like in Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka and Viy (though in a different way), distanced himself from this attitude. Gogol’s late works show his own and hard-fought ideas. The archaic attitude was a fatal threat for them. The author declares no conflicts of interests.","PeriodicalId":55932,"journal":{"name":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Demarcation Between Attitude and Poetics (On the Example of Marriage by Nikolai Gogol)\",\"authors\":\"Alexander I. Ivanitskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/24099554/17/10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gogol’s works are very promising for the demarcation between the author’s attitude and the text’s idea and poetics that, usually, successively generate one another. However, Gogol’s attitude came from the archaic and normally could not become the text’s idea - including the motif of a marriage threat. In Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka and Viy, this motif was part of the depicted folklore world and, thanks to it, was detached from the author. The motif spawns new ties between attitude, idea, and poetics in the comedy Marriage (1833, 1842). Here idea (satire on marriage-related estate swagger) is formally given, and so the motif of marriage threat (shown in Podkolesin’s indecision) goes beyond it and approves itself by contradiction. Kochkarev shows unconsciously in his praise of women the infinity of their bodies as the archaic background of Podkolesin’s attraction to and fear of marriage. This infinity comes from the Slavic belief that during menses the female body ties the people’s world with the underground world of the dead and the infinity of the Earth. The kinship between the woman and the animal, which is constantly voiced in the comedy, makes marriage shameful and transforms its diabolic symbolism into “devil’s laughter”. Placing the story of the failed marriage in the “non-Russian” Petersburg world (perceived by the Russian folk mind as a realized chimera), Gogol gives the hidden explanation of his fear of women personified in Podkolesin. At the very beginning of the comedy, the invasion of the real world by the chimeric one is manifested in “new mirrors” that show people their caricatures. The character’s obscene language is the sign of his high position in society (it is legitimated by the “sodomic” names); lies become an unconscious replacement of the truth, and the hyperbole approves the opposite. Zhevakin and Kochkarev reflect the succession of the archaic and laughter worlds in Marriage. The former represents the “alive deceased” and an old-Russian beggar; the latter a joker and a devil-matchmaker. The explicit and banal “idea” in Marriage is the starting point for the poetical expression of Gogol’s attitude. However, personifying it in the comical hero, who lives in a comical world, Gogol, like in Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka and Viy (though in a different way), distanced himself from this attitude. Gogol’s late works show his own and hard-fought ideas. The archaic attitude was a fatal threat for them. The author declares no conflicts of interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/17/10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imagologiya i Komparativistika-Imagology and Comparative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/24099554/17/10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

果戈理的作品很有希望将作者的态度与文本的观念和诗学区分开来,这两种观念和诗学通常是依次产生的。然而,果戈理的态度来自古代,通常不能成为文本的思想-包括婚姻威胁的母题。在《Dikanka和Viy附近农场的夜晚》中,这个主题是所描绘的民间传说世界的一部分,并且由于它与作者分离。在喜剧《婚姻》(1833、1842)中,这一主题在态度、观念和诗学之间产生了新的联系。在这里,思想(对与婚姻有关的财产傲慢的讽刺)是正式给出的,因此婚姻威胁的母题(表现在Podkolesin的优柔寡断中)超越了它,并通过矛盾来认可自己。Kochkarev在他对女性的赞美中无意识地展示了女性身体的无限作为波德科列申对婚姻的吸引和恐惧的古老背景。这种无限性来自于斯拉夫信仰,在月经期间,女性的身体将人们的世界与死者的地下世界和地球的无限性联系在一起。女人和动物之间的亲缘关系,在喜剧中不断被表达,使婚姻变得可耻,并将其恶魔般的象征转化为“魔鬼的笑声”。果戈理把失败的婚姻故事放在“非俄罗斯”的彼得堡世界(被俄罗斯民间认为是一个已实现的幻想),对他对波德科列申中女性的恐惧给出了隐藏的解释。在喜剧的一开始,嵌合者对现实世界的入侵就表现在“新镜子”中,向人们展示他们的漫画。角色的淫秽语言是他社会地位高的标志(这是合法的“鸡奸”的名字);谎言无意识地取代了真相,而夸张则恰恰相反。热瓦金和科奇卡列夫反映了《婚姻》中古老世界和欢笑世界的继承。前者代表“活着的死者”和一个古老的俄罗斯乞丐;后者是个爱开玩笑的人,也是个魔鬼媒人。《婚姻》中明确而平庸的“观念”是果戈理诗意化表达态度的起点。然而,生活在一个滑稽世界里的滑稽英雄果戈理将这种态度人格化,就像在《迪坎卡和维伊附近的农场的夜晚》中那样(尽管是以不同的方式),他与这种态度保持距离。果戈理的晚期作品展示了他自己的、经过艰苦奋斗的思想。这种陈旧的态度对他们是致命的威胁。作者声明没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Demarcation Between Attitude and Poetics (On the Example of Marriage by Nikolai Gogol)
Gogol’s works are very promising for the demarcation between the author’s attitude and the text’s idea and poetics that, usually, successively generate one another. However, Gogol’s attitude came from the archaic and normally could not become the text’s idea - including the motif of a marriage threat. In Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka and Viy, this motif was part of the depicted folklore world and, thanks to it, was detached from the author. The motif spawns new ties between attitude, idea, and poetics in the comedy Marriage (1833, 1842). Here idea (satire on marriage-related estate swagger) is formally given, and so the motif of marriage threat (shown in Podkolesin’s indecision) goes beyond it and approves itself by contradiction. Kochkarev shows unconsciously in his praise of women the infinity of their bodies as the archaic background of Podkolesin’s attraction to and fear of marriage. This infinity comes from the Slavic belief that during menses the female body ties the people’s world with the underground world of the dead and the infinity of the Earth. The kinship between the woman and the animal, which is constantly voiced in the comedy, makes marriage shameful and transforms its diabolic symbolism into “devil’s laughter”. Placing the story of the failed marriage in the “non-Russian” Petersburg world (perceived by the Russian folk mind as a realized chimera), Gogol gives the hidden explanation of his fear of women personified in Podkolesin. At the very beginning of the comedy, the invasion of the real world by the chimeric one is manifested in “new mirrors” that show people their caricatures. The character’s obscene language is the sign of his high position in society (it is legitimated by the “sodomic” names); lies become an unconscious replacement of the truth, and the hyperbole approves the opposite. Zhevakin and Kochkarev reflect the succession of the archaic and laughter worlds in Marriage. The former represents the “alive deceased” and an old-Russian beggar; the latter a joker and a devil-matchmaker. The explicit and banal “idea” in Marriage is the starting point for the poetical expression of Gogol’s attitude. However, personifying it in the comical hero, who lives in a comical world, Gogol, like in Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka and Viy (though in a different way), distanced himself from this attitude. Gogol’s late works show his own and hard-fought ideas. The archaic attitude was a fatal threat for them. The author declares no conflicts of interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ivan Bunin’s Middle East and Nikolay Gumilyov’s Africa: Travels Through the “Map” of Literary Techniques Motherland in the Philosophy of Eurasianism The Poetics of the Carnation: The Word and the Image in Russian Poetry From Trediakovsky to Brodsky (In the Context of European Tradition). Part One Altai Hydropoetics: Rivers Sleep of Reason: Existential Motifs in Vasily Shukshin’s Story “Thoughts”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1