从Grindal到Whitgift。雷金纳德·斯科特的政治承诺

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Etudes Episteme Pub Date : 2016-06-21 DOI:10.4000/EPISTEME.1263
Pierre Kapitaniak
{"title":"从Grindal到Whitgift。雷金纳德·斯科特的政治承诺","authors":"Pierre Kapitaniak","doi":"10.4000/EPISTEME.1263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reginald Scot’s The Discoverie of Witchcraft is above all remembered for its proto-anthropological approach to the question of witchcraft, while the anti-Catholicism of his books is usually played down or rapidly acknowledged as part of a general trend. And yet the author fully participates in a vast campaign of anti-Catholic propaganda fuelled by the Jesuit missions of the early 1580s and further intensified by the appointment of John Whitgift as archbishop of Canterbury in 1583. Peter Elmer has recently demonstrated that Scot was charged by Whitgift with writing a report of non-conformist activities in Kent, which begs to re-examine The Discoverie of Witchcraft not only through the anti-Catholic prism but also through an anti-puritan one. Yet Scot’s treatise shows very few traces of such an important shift in the doctrinal positions of its author who, until the arrival of Whitgift, seemed to have shared Edmund Grindal’s views by supporting tolerance and freedom of preaching. The present paper will try to show that the answer may lie in the very circumstances of its composition, written between 1582 and 1584 and published in the summer of 1584.","PeriodicalId":40360,"journal":{"name":"Etudes Episteme","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Grindal to Whitgift. The Political Commitment of Reginald Scot\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Kapitaniak\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/EPISTEME.1263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reginald Scot’s The Discoverie of Witchcraft is above all remembered for its proto-anthropological approach to the question of witchcraft, while the anti-Catholicism of his books is usually played down or rapidly acknowledged as part of a general trend. And yet the author fully participates in a vast campaign of anti-Catholic propaganda fuelled by the Jesuit missions of the early 1580s and further intensified by the appointment of John Whitgift as archbishop of Canterbury in 1583. Peter Elmer has recently demonstrated that Scot was charged by Whitgift with writing a report of non-conformist activities in Kent, which begs to re-examine The Discoverie of Witchcraft not only through the anti-Catholic prism but also through an anti-puritan one. Yet Scot’s treatise shows very few traces of such an important shift in the doctrinal positions of its author who, until the arrival of Whitgift, seemed to have shared Edmund Grindal’s views by supporting tolerance and freedom of preaching. The present paper will try to show that the answer may lie in the very circumstances of its composition, written between 1582 and 1584 and published in the summer of 1584.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etudes Episteme\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etudes Episteme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/EPISTEME.1263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etudes Episteme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/EPISTEME.1263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雷金纳德·斯科特(Reginald scott)的《巫术的发现》(The discoveryof Witchcraft)首先因其对巫术问题的原始人类学方法而为人所铭记,而他的书中反天主教的观点通常被淡化或迅速视为一种普遍趋势的一部分。然而,作者完全参与了一场大规模的反天主教宣传运动,这场运动是由1580年代初耶稣会传教士推动的,1583年约翰·惠特吉特(John Whitgift)被任命为坎特伯雷大主教而进一步加剧的。彼得·埃尔默(Peter Elmer)最近证明,斯科特被惠特吉特(Whitgift)指控撰写了一份关于肯特郡非国教活动的报告,该报告要求通过反天主教和反清教的棱镜重新审视《巫术发现》。然而,斯科特的论文几乎没有显示出作者在教义立场上如此重要转变的痕迹。在惠特吉特到来之前,作者似乎与埃德蒙·格林德尔持同样的观点,支持宽容和布道自由。本文将试图证明,答案可能就在这篇写于1582年至1584年,并于1584年夏天发表的文章中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Grindal to Whitgift. The Political Commitment of Reginald Scot
Reginald Scot’s The Discoverie of Witchcraft is above all remembered for its proto-anthropological approach to the question of witchcraft, while the anti-Catholicism of his books is usually played down or rapidly acknowledged as part of a general trend. And yet the author fully participates in a vast campaign of anti-Catholic propaganda fuelled by the Jesuit missions of the early 1580s and further intensified by the appointment of John Whitgift as archbishop of Canterbury in 1583. Peter Elmer has recently demonstrated that Scot was charged by Whitgift with writing a report of non-conformist activities in Kent, which begs to re-examine The Discoverie of Witchcraft not only through the anti-Catholic prism but also through an anti-puritan one. Yet Scot’s treatise shows very few traces of such an important shift in the doctrinal positions of its author who, until the arrival of Whitgift, seemed to have shared Edmund Grindal’s views by supporting tolerance and freedom of preaching. The present paper will try to show that the answer may lie in the very circumstances of its composition, written between 1582 and 1584 and published in the summer of 1584.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Etudes Episteme
Etudes Episteme HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
« Injure pour injure » : Une polémique presque invisible autour De la fréquente communion d’Antoine Arnauld Prêcher contre Rome au temps de la Révocation : Babylone, figure archétypale de la polémique anticatholique dans l’homilétique protestante du second XVIIe siècle Prêcher contre la mécréance. Le problème de l’hétérodoxie dans les sermons de Jean Gerson Chronique prétendue de l’événement extraordinaire : l’incipit de la deuxième partie de La Araucana L’appropriation du fait divers dans quelques nouvelles du Cinquecento: le cas de la comtesse de Challant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1