《检验先知的精神:吉恩·切姆姆,忧郁和切姆姆的“幻觉”》

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Etudes Episteme Pub Date : 2015-12-08 DOI:10.4000/EPISTEME.827
J. Hillman
{"title":"《检验先知的精神:吉恩·切姆姆,忧郁和切姆姆的“幻觉”》","authors":"J. Hillman","doi":"10.4000/EPISTEME.827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contends that the vulnerability of mystics to accusations of “melancholy” was harnessed in late seventeenth-century France as part of an anti-mystical movement. Several historians have noted how the suspicion of mystics gained momentum in France during this period. Reports of anti-mystic scandals from elsewhere in Europe such as the Alumbrados in Seville (1623) were translated into French and widely publicized. There were also a number of domestic incidents including the persecution of the Illumines of Picardy in 1635, the possession at Loudun in 1635, and the infamous Quietist affair of the 1690s. This paper will present a case study from the middle decade of the century, focusing on the Carmelite Jean Cheron’s (1596-1673) critique of the “false spirituality” of female mystics. It will situate Cheron’s published treatise the Examen de la theologie mystique (1657) in the wider context of the anti-mystical spiritual currents of the century, as well as locating it within a longer tradition of using melancholy to discredit spiritual experiences. In the course of this discussion, this article argues that Cheron’s text can provide a window onto the anxieties about spiritual directors who were failing in their duties to subject mystical experiences to the criteria which “discernment” literature had set out for them. In doing so, it finds support for the recent approaches of historians who have sought to destabilize the notion that the anti-mystical movement of the seventeenth century constituted an attack on female spirituality.","PeriodicalId":40360,"journal":{"name":"Etudes Episteme","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Spirit of the Prophets: Jean Chéron, Melancholy and the “Illusions” of Dévotes\",\"authors\":\"J. Hillman\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/EPISTEME.827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article contends that the vulnerability of mystics to accusations of “melancholy” was harnessed in late seventeenth-century France as part of an anti-mystical movement. Several historians have noted how the suspicion of mystics gained momentum in France during this period. Reports of anti-mystic scandals from elsewhere in Europe such as the Alumbrados in Seville (1623) were translated into French and widely publicized. There were also a number of domestic incidents including the persecution of the Illumines of Picardy in 1635, the possession at Loudun in 1635, and the infamous Quietist affair of the 1690s. This paper will present a case study from the middle decade of the century, focusing on the Carmelite Jean Cheron’s (1596-1673) critique of the “false spirituality” of female mystics. It will situate Cheron’s published treatise the Examen de la theologie mystique (1657) in the wider context of the anti-mystical spiritual currents of the century, as well as locating it within a longer tradition of using melancholy to discredit spiritual experiences. In the course of this discussion, this article argues that Cheron’s text can provide a window onto the anxieties about spiritual directors who were failing in their duties to subject mystical experiences to the criteria which “discernment” literature had set out for them. In doing so, it finds support for the recent approaches of historians who have sought to destabilize the notion that the anti-mystical movement of the seventeenth century constituted an attack on female spirituality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Etudes Episteme\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Etudes Episteme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/EPISTEME.827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etudes Episteme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/EPISTEME.827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,神秘主义者易受“忧郁”指责的弱点在17世纪晚期的法国被利用为反神秘主义运动的一部分。几位历史学家注意到,在这一时期,法国对神秘主义者的怀疑是如何高涨起来的。来自欧洲其他地方的反神秘主义丑闻的报道,如塞维利亚的Alumbrados(1623年),被翻译成法语并广为宣传。还有一些国内事件,包括1635年对皮卡第光明会的迫害,1635年在卢敦的占有,以及1690年代臭名昭著的安静主义者事件。本文将介绍本世纪中叶的一个案例研究,重点关注加尔默罗会修士让·谢龙(1596-1673)对女性神秘主义者“虚假灵性”的批评。它将把谢龙发表的论文《神秘神学的考试》(Examen de la theologie mystique, 1657年)置于本世纪反神秘主义精神潮流的更广泛背景下,并将其置于一个更悠久的传统中,即用忧郁来怀疑精神体验。在这个讨论过程中,本文认为,Cheron的文本可以提供一个窗口,以了解精神导师的焦虑,他们未能履行其职责,将神秘体验置于“洞察力”文学为他们设定的标准之下。在这样做的过程中,它为历史学家最近的方法提供了支持,这些方法试图动摇17世纪反神秘主义运动构成对女性精神攻击的观念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing the Spirit of the Prophets: Jean Chéron, Melancholy and the “Illusions” of Dévotes
This article contends that the vulnerability of mystics to accusations of “melancholy” was harnessed in late seventeenth-century France as part of an anti-mystical movement. Several historians have noted how the suspicion of mystics gained momentum in France during this period. Reports of anti-mystic scandals from elsewhere in Europe such as the Alumbrados in Seville (1623) were translated into French and widely publicized. There were also a number of domestic incidents including the persecution of the Illumines of Picardy in 1635, the possession at Loudun in 1635, and the infamous Quietist affair of the 1690s. This paper will present a case study from the middle decade of the century, focusing on the Carmelite Jean Cheron’s (1596-1673) critique of the “false spirituality” of female mystics. It will situate Cheron’s published treatise the Examen de la theologie mystique (1657) in the wider context of the anti-mystical spiritual currents of the century, as well as locating it within a longer tradition of using melancholy to discredit spiritual experiences. In the course of this discussion, this article argues that Cheron’s text can provide a window onto the anxieties about spiritual directors who were failing in their duties to subject mystical experiences to the criteria which “discernment” literature had set out for them. In doing so, it finds support for the recent approaches of historians who have sought to destabilize the notion that the anti-mystical movement of the seventeenth century constituted an attack on female spirituality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Etudes Episteme
Etudes Episteme HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
« Injure pour injure » : Une polémique presque invisible autour De la fréquente communion d’Antoine Arnauld Prêcher contre Rome au temps de la Révocation : Babylone, figure archétypale de la polémique anticatholique dans l’homilétique protestante du second XVIIe siècle Prêcher contre la mécréance. Le problème de l’hétérodoxie dans les sermons de Jean Gerson Chronique prétendue de l’événement extraordinaire : l’incipit de la deuxième partie de La Araucana L’appropriation du fait divers dans quelques nouvelles du Cinquecento: le cas de la comtesse de Challant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1