{"title":"民主和两极分化。论两极分化时代的艾金和塔利斯的政治论述","authors":"A. Vaidya","doi":"10.24917/20841043.10.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our tools for promoting civility are inevitably condemned to produce new forms of in‑ civility, and the pathologies of public discourse are always at least one step ahead of our capacity to understand and correct them. The tragedy is inescapable (Aikin & Talisse, 2020: 127, emphasis added ).","PeriodicalId":30403,"journal":{"name":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democracy and polarization. Comments on Aikin and Talisse’s Political argument in a polarized age\",\"authors\":\"A. Vaidya\",\"doi\":\"10.24917/20841043.10.2.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our tools for promoting civility are inevitably condemned to produce new forms of in‑ civility, and the pathologies of public discourse are always at least one step ahead of our capacity to understand and correct them. The tragedy is inescapable (Aikin & Talisse, 2020: 127, emphasis added ).\",\"PeriodicalId\":30403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.2.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument Biannual Philosophical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24917/20841043.10.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Democracy and polarization. Comments on Aikin and Talisse’s Political argument in a polarized age
Our tools for promoting civility are inevitably condemned to produce new forms of in‑ civility, and the pathologies of public discourse are always at least one step ahead of our capacity to understand and correct them. The tragedy is inescapable (Aikin & Talisse, 2020: 127, emphasis added ).
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
