发酵焙烧辅食的质量评价

B. K. Adeoye, A. Chukwunulu, Y. Makinde, E. Ngozi, I. Ani, N. Ajuzie
{"title":"发酵焙烧辅食的质量评价","authors":"B. K. Adeoye, A. Chukwunulu, Y. Makinde, E. Ngozi, I. Ani, N. Ajuzie","doi":"10.12691/ajfn-6-4-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at assessing the quality of complementary food made from corn, millet and soybean using roasting and fermentation methods. There were two different compositions from each of the method. The functional properties, chemical composition, protein quality and sensory attributes of the formulated diets were determined and the results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were separated by Duncan multiple range tests. The difference between the control and the test diets was determined by t-test (P<0.05). Results showed that there was significant difference in the water absorption and swelling capacity but the bulk density of the samples were not significantly different at P<0.05. There was significant difference (P<0.05) in the chemical composition of the test diets. The fermented complementary food had higher moisture content (7.2-8.2 %), crude fiber (14.0-19.8%), fat (12.3-12.6%) and protein (14.6-16.9%) while roasted samples was high in ash (2.3-3.2%), carbohydrate (50.0-52.8%) and energy (351.8-368.7%). The feed efficiency ratio of the control group was low (8.2) while the groups on roasted samples had higher feed conversion ratio (12.6 and 14.5). The PER of the test samples were comparable to PER for regular diet and the result of t-test showed that the regular diet was not significantly different from the test diets at P<0.05. Furthermore, the results of sensory evaluation showed that there was no significant difference in the sensory quality of the test diets. The potential of roasted complementary food and fermented complementary food in meeting infant nutritional need was comparable.","PeriodicalId":7859,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Food and Nutrition","volume":"48 1","pages":"96-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Assessment of Complementary Food Produced Using Fermentation and Roasting Methods\",\"authors\":\"B. K. Adeoye, A. Chukwunulu, Y. Makinde, E. Ngozi, I. Ani, N. Ajuzie\",\"doi\":\"10.12691/ajfn-6-4-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed at assessing the quality of complementary food made from corn, millet and soybean using roasting and fermentation methods. There were two different compositions from each of the method. The functional properties, chemical composition, protein quality and sensory attributes of the formulated diets were determined and the results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were separated by Duncan multiple range tests. The difference between the control and the test diets was determined by t-test (P<0.05). Results showed that there was significant difference in the water absorption and swelling capacity but the bulk density of the samples were not significantly different at P<0.05. There was significant difference (P<0.05) in the chemical composition of the test diets. The fermented complementary food had higher moisture content (7.2-8.2 %), crude fiber (14.0-19.8%), fat (12.3-12.6%) and protein (14.6-16.9%) while roasted samples was high in ash (2.3-3.2%), carbohydrate (50.0-52.8%) and energy (351.8-368.7%). The feed efficiency ratio of the control group was low (8.2) while the groups on roasted samples had higher feed conversion ratio (12.6 and 14.5). The PER of the test samples were comparable to PER for regular diet and the result of t-test showed that the regular diet was not significantly different from the test diets at P<0.05. Furthermore, the results of sensory evaluation showed that there was no significant difference in the sensory quality of the test diets. The potential of roasted complementary food and fermented complementary food in meeting infant nutritional need was comparable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Food and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"96-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Food and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12691/ajfn-6-4-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Food and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/ajfn-6-4-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

以玉米、谷子和大豆为原料,采用烘烤和发酵法制备辅食。每种方法都有两种不同的成分。测定各组饲粮的功能特性、化学成分、蛋白质品质和感官特性,采用方差分析(ANOVA)对结果进行分析,均数采用Duncan多元极差检验分离。对照组与试验饲粮的差异采用t检验(P<0.05)。结果表明:两种样品的吸水率和溶胀率差异显著,容重差异不显著(P<0.05);试验饲粮的化学成分差异显著(P<0.05)。发酵后的辅食水分含量(7.2 ~ 8.2%)、粗纤维含量(14.0 ~ 19.8%)、脂肪含量(12.3 ~ 12.6%)、蛋白质含量(14.6 ~ 16.9%)较高,烘烤后的辅食灰分含量(2.3 ~ 3.2%)、碳水化合物含量(50.0 ~ 52.8%)、能量含量(351.8 ~ 368.7%)较高。对照组的饲料效率较低(8.2),而烤样组的饲料系数较高(12.6和14.5)。试验样品的PER与常规饲粮的PER相当,t检验结果显示常规饲粮与试验饲粮差异不显著(P<0.05)。此外,感官评价结果显示,试验饲粮的感官质量无显著差异。烘焙辅食和发酵辅食在满足婴儿营养需求方面的潜力是相当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Assessment of Complementary Food Produced Using Fermentation and Roasting Methods
This study aimed at assessing the quality of complementary food made from corn, millet and soybean using roasting and fermentation methods. There were two different compositions from each of the method. The functional properties, chemical composition, protein quality and sensory attributes of the formulated diets were determined and the results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were separated by Duncan multiple range tests. The difference between the control and the test diets was determined by t-test (P<0.05). Results showed that there was significant difference in the water absorption and swelling capacity but the bulk density of the samples were not significantly different at P<0.05. There was significant difference (P<0.05) in the chemical composition of the test diets. The fermented complementary food had higher moisture content (7.2-8.2 %), crude fiber (14.0-19.8%), fat (12.3-12.6%) and protein (14.6-16.9%) while roasted samples was high in ash (2.3-3.2%), carbohydrate (50.0-52.8%) and energy (351.8-368.7%). The feed efficiency ratio of the control group was low (8.2) while the groups on roasted samples had higher feed conversion ratio (12.6 and 14.5). The PER of the test samples were comparable to PER for regular diet and the result of t-test showed that the regular diet was not significantly different from the test diets at P<0.05. Furthermore, the results of sensory evaluation showed that there was no significant difference in the sensory quality of the test diets. The potential of roasted complementary food and fermented complementary food in meeting infant nutritional need was comparable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Macronutrient Composition and Starch Type of Food Formulations Based on Rice and Cowpea Varieties Proximal Composition and Chemical Properties of the Seeds and Seed Oils of Two Peanut Varieties Grown in the Republic of Congo Benefits of Natural Compounds in Diabetes Complications by Prevention and Reversing Protein Glycation and Protecting Cells against Oxidative Stress Evaluation of the Characteristics of Goat Carcasses Slaughtered at the Korhogo Slaughterhouse (Ivory Coast) Natural Compounds Modulate Apolipoprotein E Gene and Protein Expression in Fibroblasts Derived from Young and Old Female Alzheimer’s Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1