Antecedents and consequences of the disability stigma for frontline employees: A qualitative study

Landon M. McFarland, Joanne M. Tran
{"title":"Antecedents and consequences of the disability stigma for frontline employees: A qualitative study","authors":"Landon M. McFarland, Joanne M. Tran","doi":"10.1080/21639159.2023.2243962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe employment of people with disabilities (PWDs) is an important growing topic in contemporary society. Despite legal protections and increasing awareness of the importance of inclusion and diversity, PWDs still face significant barriers to employment worldwide, particularly in service industries. As hiring PWDs becomes more prevalent, scholars have only recently begun to study consumers’ perceptions of frontline employees (FLEs) with disabilities, especially intellectual disabilities, and their potential to stigmatize FLEs with disabilities. As such, we explore consumers’ perceptions of FLEs with disabilities to understand the attitudes, biases, and behaviors that may influence their interactions with such employees. Using a thematic coding analysis, we develop a framework for understanding the antecedents and consequences of disability stigma for FLEs. Drawing on this framework, we present the results of a qualitative study examining consumer perceptions of FLEs with disabilities working in restaurants, highlighting the key themes that emerged from our analysis. Specifically, we uncover internal influences and customer affect toward PWDs as antecedents to consumers’ perceptions of FLEs with disabilities while consumer behavior and firm actions as consequences. Nevertheless, these matters remain prominent issues for businesses working to create more inclusive and welcoming environments for all customers and employees, regardless of disability status.KEYWORDS: Stigmapeople with disabilitiesdiversityinclusionfrontline employee Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Drapeau Center for Undergraduate Research at The University of Southern Mississippi.","PeriodicalId":45711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","volume":"312 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2023.2243962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe employment of people with disabilities (PWDs) is an important growing topic in contemporary society. Despite legal protections and increasing awareness of the importance of inclusion and diversity, PWDs still face significant barriers to employment worldwide, particularly in service industries. As hiring PWDs becomes more prevalent, scholars have only recently begun to study consumers’ perceptions of frontline employees (FLEs) with disabilities, especially intellectual disabilities, and their potential to stigmatize FLEs with disabilities. As such, we explore consumers’ perceptions of FLEs with disabilities to understand the attitudes, biases, and behaviors that may influence their interactions with such employees. Using a thematic coding analysis, we develop a framework for understanding the antecedents and consequences of disability stigma for FLEs. Drawing on this framework, we present the results of a qualitative study examining consumer perceptions of FLEs with disabilities working in restaurants, highlighting the key themes that emerged from our analysis. Specifically, we uncover internal influences and customer affect toward PWDs as antecedents to consumers’ perceptions of FLEs with disabilities while consumer behavior and firm actions as consequences. Nevertheless, these matters remain prominent issues for businesses working to create more inclusive and welcoming environments for all customers and employees, regardless of disability status.KEYWORDS: Stigmapeople with disabilitiesdiversityinclusionfrontline employee Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Drapeau Center for Undergraduate Research at The University of Southern Mississippi.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一线员工残疾污名的前因与后果:一项质性研究
摘要残疾人就业问题是当今社会日益关注的重要话题。尽管有法律保护,人们也越来越意识到包容和多元化的重要性,但残疾人士在全球范围内,特别是在服务业,仍然面临着重大的就业障碍。随着雇佣残疾人士的现象越来越普遍,学者们最近才开始研究消费者对残疾前线员工(尤其是智障员工)的看法,以及他们对残疾前线员工的污名化。因此,我们探讨了消费者对残疾员工的看法,以了解可能影响他们与这些员工互动的态度、偏见和行为。使用主题编码分析,我们开发了一个框架来理解残疾耻辱感的前因后果。根据这一框架,我们提出了一项定性研究的结果,该研究调查了消费者对在餐馆工作的残疾员工的看法,突出了我们分析中出现的关键主题。具体而言,我们发现内部影响和消费者对残疾人士的影响是消费者对残疾人士认知的前因,而消费者行为和坚定行动是后果。然而,对于那些努力为所有客户和员工创造更包容、更友好的环境的企业来说,这些问题仍然是突出的问题,而不管残疾状况如何。关键词:歧视;残障人士;多元化;本研究得到了南密西西比大学德拉波本科生研究中心的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Talk to engage: The influence of smartphone voice assistants on consumers’ brand engagement Being moral motivates consumers to work harder and accept challenges How does omnichannel retailing deliver customer value? Insights from science mapping and future agenda Utilizing gain and loss message framing for consumers: A Machiavellian perspective The current state of big data analytics research in marketing: A systematic review using TCCM approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1