An insight into conflict and collaboration between plants and microorganisms

IF 5.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1186/s40538-024-00684-9
Qaisar Khan, Xinghai Huang, Zhijie He, Hao Wang, Ying Chen, Gengshou Xia, Yixi Wang, Fayong Lang, Yan Zhang
{"title":"An insight into conflict and collaboration between plants and microorganisms","authors":"Qaisar Khan,&nbsp;Xinghai Huang,&nbsp;Zhijie He,&nbsp;Hao Wang,&nbsp;Ying Chen,&nbsp;Gengshou Xia,&nbsp;Yixi Wang,&nbsp;Fayong Lang,&nbsp;Yan Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s40538-024-00684-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plants and microorganisms have been co-evolving and interacting for billions of years. Prior researchers have explored the plant’s immune system responses and interaction with diverse microbes, but several ambiguities need further explanation. This review provides insight into mechanisms underlying plant–microbe interaction and knowledge dearth domains, along with possibilities to use beneficial microbes to improve plant growth, disease resistance, nutritional value, and productivity. Microorganisms in the phyllosphere and the rhizosphere could be beneficial or pathogenic. Host plants use their innate immune system and the antagonistic competence of plant-growth-promoting microbes against pathogens. The innate immune system of plants has two paramount protection forms involving different types of immune receptors, which assist in recognizing non-self-components. The first group of receptors is membrane-resident pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which are responsible for sensing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The second group consists of intracellular immune sensors, specifically resistance (R) proteins, astute in recognizing the structure or function of strain-specific pathogen effectors injected into host plant cells. Plants activate their pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) defense mechanisms to counter the infection. Plants benefit from certain microbes by promoting their growth, disease resistance, and resilience under various stress conditions in exchange for shelter and nutrients.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":512,"journal":{"name":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://chembioagro.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40538-024-00684-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40538-024-00684-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plants and microorganisms have been co-evolving and interacting for billions of years. Prior researchers have explored the plant’s immune system responses and interaction with diverse microbes, but several ambiguities need further explanation. This review provides insight into mechanisms underlying plant–microbe interaction and knowledge dearth domains, along with possibilities to use beneficial microbes to improve plant growth, disease resistance, nutritional value, and productivity. Microorganisms in the phyllosphere and the rhizosphere could be beneficial or pathogenic. Host plants use their innate immune system and the antagonistic competence of plant-growth-promoting microbes against pathogens. The innate immune system of plants has two paramount protection forms involving different types of immune receptors, which assist in recognizing non-self-components. The first group of receptors is membrane-resident pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which are responsible for sensing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The second group consists of intracellular immune sensors, specifically resistance (R) proteins, astute in recognizing the structure or function of strain-specific pathogen effectors injected into host plant cells. Plants activate their pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) defense mechanisms to counter the infection. Plants benefit from certain microbes by promoting their growth, disease resistance, and resilience under various stress conditions in exchange for shelter and nutrients.

Graphical Abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洞察植物与微生物之间的冲突与合作
数十亿年来,植物和微生物一直在共同进化和相互作用。之前的研究人员已经探索了植物的免疫系统反应以及与各种微生物的相互作用,但仍有一些模糊之处需要进一步解释。本综述深入探讨了植物与微生物相互作用的内在机制和知识匮乏领域,以及利用有益微生物改善植物生长、抗病性、营养价值和生产力的可能性。植物层和根瘤层中的微生物可能是有益的,也可能是致病的。寄主植物利用其先天免疫系统和促进植物生长的微生物的拮抗能力来对抗病原体。植物的先天免疫系统有两种最重要的保护形式,涉及不同类型的免疫受体,它们有助于识别非自身成分。第一类受体是驻膜模式识别受体(PRRs),负责感知微生物相关分子模式(MAMPs)和损伤相关分子模式(DAMPs)。第二类是细胞内免疫传感器,特别是抗性(R)蛋白,它们能敏锐地识别注入寄主植物细胞的特定病原体效应物的结构或功能。植物启动模式触发免疫(PTI)和效应触发免疫(ETI)防御机制来对抗感染。植物从某些微生物中获益,它们促进了植物的生长、抗病性以及在各种胁迫条件下的恢复能力,以换取庇护所和养分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed forum for the advancement and application to all fields of agriculture of modern chemical, biochemical and molecular technologies. The scope of this journal includes chemical and biochemical processes aimed to increase sustainable agricultural and food production, the evaluation of quality and origin of raw primary products and their transformation into foods and chemicals, as well as environmental monitoring and remediation. Of special interest are the effects of chemical and biochemical technologies, also at the nano and supramolecular scale, on the relationships between soil, plants, microorganisms and their environment, with the help of modern bioinformatics. Another special focus is the use of modern bioorganic and biological chemistry to develop new technologies for plant nutrition and bio-stimulation, advancement of biorefineries from biomasses, safe and traceable food products, carbon storage in soil and plants and restoration of contaminated soils to agriculture. This journal presents the first opportunity to bring together researchers from a wide number of disciplines within the agricultural chemical and biological sciences, from both industry and academia. The principle aim of Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture is to allow the exchange of the most advanced chemical and biochemical knowledge to develop technologies which address one of the most pressing challenges of our times - sustaining a growing world population. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture publishes original research articles, short letters and invited reviews. Articles from scientists in industry, academia as well as private research institutes, non-governmental and environmental organizations are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Insights into larval development and protein biochemical alterations of Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) following Beauveria bassiana and Solanum lycopersicum treatments The combination of nanoparticles and endophytes boosts Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) resistance to drought stress by elevating levels of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and essential oils Pecan-medicinal crops intercropping improved soil fertility and promoted interactions between soil microorganisms and metabolites An insight into conflict and collaboration between plants and microorganisms Targeted metabolomics analysis of fatty acids in lamb meat for the authentication of paper mulberry silage as a substitute for alfalfa silage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1