Export fluxes of dissolved, colloidal and particulate organic carbon, major and trace elements from the Ob River and its tributaries across seasons

IF 11.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Water Research Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2025.123221
Ivan V. Krickov, Sergey N. Vorobyev, Larisa G. Kolesnichenko, Yuri Kolesnichenko, Dmitri Zinchenko, Liudmila S. Shirokova, Oleg S. Pokrovsky
{"title":"Export fluxes of dissolved, colloidal and particulate organic carbon, major and trace elements from the Ob River and its tributaries across seasons","authors":"Ivan V. Krickov, Sergey N. Vorobyev, Larisa G. Kolesnichenko, Yuri Kolesnichenko, Dmitri Zinchenko, Liudmila S. Shirokova, Oleg S. Pokrovsky","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Riverine export fluxes of organic carbon (OC), major and trace elements remain at the forefront of environmental research in Arctic and subarctic regions, due mostly to high sensitivity of river hydrochemical parameters to climate warming and, at the same time, global importance of OC, nutrients and toxicants delivered by rivers to the Arctic Ocean. In contrast to reliable information on export fluxes of carbon and metals from the mainland to the Arctic Ocean by large and mid-size Arctic rivers, the majority of these studies quantify either dissolved (&lt; 0.45 µm) or particulate suspended matter (PSM) fluxes, without mechanistic analyses of element speciation in most labile, low molecular weight (LMW) or colloidal form. Here we assessed colloidal versus LMW (&lt; 3 kDa) and suspended (&gt; 0.45 µm) export of OC, major and trace elements in a large Siberian river (Ob) and its smaller tributaries, situated within a boreal taiga / wetland zone. The main differences between Ob and its small tributaries are <em>i</em>) higher dissolved OC and dissolved and particulate Fe concentrations in tributaries, due to input from surrounding bogs, <em>ii</em>) much higher PSM load (clays) in the large river (Ob) compared to smaller tributaries; and <em>iii</em>) strong underground water input for the Ob River, especially during baseflow, which is less pronounced for its tributaries. These major environmental factors were largely responsible for specific features of colloidal vs particulate export for the Ob River and its tributaries.Annual export fluxes normalized to the watershed area (yields) were similar for most elements in dissolved (&lt; 0.45 µm) fraction between the Ob and the tributaries, exempting Fe, Mn, Co and Zn which were higher in tributaries essentially due to input from wetlands. Export of Mo, V, W and U was higher in the Ob River due to pronounced groundwater influence. Colloidal (3 kDa – 0.45 µm) yields were also generally higher in the tributary compared to Ob, except for those soluble elements of groundwater input (Sr, Mo, W, U). The particulate suspended (&gt; 0.45 µm) yield of all elements, except Mn, was much higher in the Ob River when compared to its smaller tributaries. Overall, elemental fluxes of small wetland-draining tributaries of the Ob River can be considered analogous to the small rivers of the permafrost-free portion of the Arctic coast. Such small rivers are more sensitive to processes occurring at the watershed level, hence being an efficient potential sentinel for environmental changes. Fluxes in large Arctic coast rivers are more conservative and are strongly controlled by the effects of PSM interaction with river water at high flow and groundwater loading at base flow. Global significance of our findings is that elemental dissolved (&lt; 0.45 µm) yields of small Artic rivers draining coastal wetlands and boreal forests can be adequately (within a factor of 2 to 3, comparable to inter-annul variations and uncertainties) approximated by those currently available for mid-sized and large rivers.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Riverine export fluxes of organic carbon (OC), major and trace elements remain at the forefront of environmental research in Arctic and subarctic regions, due mostly to high sensitivity of river hydrochemical parameters to climate warming and, at the same time, global importance of OC, nutrients and toxicants delivered by rivers to the Arctic Ocean. In contrast to reliable information on export fluxes of carbon and metals from the mainland to the Arctic Ocean by large and mid-size Arctic rivers, the majority of these studies quantify either dissolved (< 0.45 µm) or particulate suspended matter (PSM) fluxes, without mechanistic analyses of element speciation in most labile, low molecular weight (LMW) or colloidal form. Here we assessed colloidal versus LMW (< 3 kDa) and suspended (> 0.45 µm) export of OC, major and trace elements in a large Siberian river (Ob) and its smaller tributaries, situated within a boreal taiga / wetland zone. The main differences between Ob and its small tributaries are i) higher dissolved OC and dissolved and particulate Fe concentrations in tributaries, due to input from surrounding bogs, ii) much higher PSM load (clays) in the large river (Ob) compared to smaller tributaries; and iii) strong underground water input for the Ob River, especially during baseflow, which is less pronounced for its tributaries. These major environmental factors were largely responsible for specific features of colloidal vs particulate export for the Ob River and its tributaries.Annual export fluxes normalized to the watershed area (yields) were similar for most elements in dissolved (< 0.45 µm) fraction between the Ob and the tributaries, exempting Fe, Mn, Co and Zn which were higher in tributaries essentially due to input from wetlands. Export of Mo, V, W and U was higher in the Ob River due to pronounced groundwater influence. Colloidal (3 kDa – 0.45 µm) yields were also generally higher in the tributary compared to Ob, except for those soluble elements of groundwater input (Sr, Mo, W, U). The particulate suspended (> 0.45 µm) yield of all elements, except Mn, was much higher in the Ob River when compared to its smaller tributaries. Overall, elemental fluxes of small wetland-draining tributaries of the Ob River can be considered analogous to the small rivers of the permafrost-free portion of the Arctic coast. Such small rivers are more sensitive to processes occurring at the watershed level, hence being an efficient potential sentinel for environmental changes. Fluxes in large Arctic coast rivers are more conservative and are strongly controlled by the effects of PSM interaction with river water at high flow and groundwater loading at base flow. Global significance of our findings is that elemental dissolved (< 0.45 µm) yields of small Artic rivers draining coastal wetlands and boreal forests can be adequately (within a factor of 2 to 3, comparable to inter-annul variations and uncertainties) approximated by those currently available for mid-sized and large rivers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Research
Water Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
9.40%
发文量
1307
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include: •Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management; •Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure; •Drinking water treatment and distribution; •Potable and non-potable water reuse; •Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment; •Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions; •Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment; •Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution; •Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation; •Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts; •Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle; •Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the reaction chemistry of sulfoxides during water chlorination. Export fluxes of dissolved, colloidal and particulate organic carbon, major and trace elements from the Ob River and its tributaries across seasons Current status, potential assessment, and future directions of biological treatments of unconventional oil and gas wastewater Ceramic membrane fouling caused by recycling biological activated carbon filter backwash water: effective backwash with ozone micro-nano bubbles Airborne Geophysical Analysis to Decipher Salinization for Coastal Louisiana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1