Anna L. Macready , Sophie Hieke , Magdalena Klimczuk-Kochańska , Szymon Szumiał , Katharina Wachter , Matthieu H. Arnoult , Liesbet Vranken , Klaus G. Grunert
{"title":"Why trust is crucial – The moderating role of trust in the relationship between motivation and intention to buy healthy, sustainable and novel foods","authors":"Anna L. Macready , Sophie Hieke , Magdalena Klimczuk-Kochańska , Szymon Szumiał , Katharina Wachter , Matthieu H. Arnoult , Liesbet Vranken , Klaus G. Grunert","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Within an increasingly resource-challenged food system, consumers need greater confidence in their ability to make better and more informed food choices. We investigated the role of trust as a moderator of the relationship between the motivation to make healthy, sustainable and novel food choices and the intention to actually do so, based on the reasoning that novel healthy and sustainable food products are marketed by credence attributes, where consumers must rely on information that is provided by food chain actors. In an online survey conducted in 13 European countries over two years with a sample of 25,610 respondents, we explored how social trust, beliefs in trustworthiness and overall trust moderate the motivation-intention relationship. Results show that while trust cannot compensate for a lack of motivation to engage in healthy or sustainable behaviours, the relationship between motivation and intention was strengthened by higher levels of trust for sustainable and innovative food choices, but not for healthy food choices, and this finding was largely consistent across both years. For sustainable choices, the motivation-intention relationship was moderated by trust in farmers and retailers but not in manufacturers or authorities. All types of trust moderated the motivation-intention relationship for adoption of novel foods. This has implications for investment in trust initiatives on the part of policymakers, food businesses and food system actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105386"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400288X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Within an increasingly resource-challenged food system, consumers need greater confidence in their ability to make better and more informed food choices. We investigated the role of trust as a moderator of the relationship between the motivation to make healthy, sustainable and novel food choices and the intention to actually do so, based on the reasoning that novel healthy and sustainable food products are marketed by credence attributes, where consumers must rely on information that is provided by food chain actors. In an online survey conducted in 13 European countries over two years with a sample of 25,610 respondents, we explored how social trust, beliefs in trustworthiness and overall trust moderate the motivation-intention relationship. Results show that while trust cannot compensate for a lack of motivation to engage in healthy or sustainable behaviours, the relationship between motivation and intention was strengthened by higher levels of trust for sustainable and innovative food choices, but not for healthy food choices, and this finding was largely consistent across both years. For sustainable choices, the motivation-intention relationship was moderated by trust in farmers and retailers but not in manufacturers or authorities. All types of trust moderated the motivation-intention relationship for adoption of novel foods. This has implications for investment in trust initiatives on the part of policymakers, food businesses and food system actors.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.