Why trust is crucial – The moderating role of trust in the relationship between motivation and intention to buy healthy, sustainable and novel foods

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105386
Anna L. Macready , Sophie Hieke , Magdalena Klimczuk-Kochańska , Szymon Szumiał , Katharina Wachter , Matthieu H. Arnoult , Liesbet Vranken , Klaus G. Grunert
{"title":"Why trust is crucial – The moderating role of trust in the relationship between motivation and intention to buy healthy, sustainable and novel foods","authors":"Anna L. Macready ,&nbsp;Sophie Hieke ,&nbsp;Magdalena Klimczuk-Kochańska ,&nbsp;Szymon Szumiał ,&nbsp;Katharina Wachter ,&nbsp;Matthieu H. Arnoult ,&nbsp;Liesbet Vranken ,&nbsp;Klaus G. Grunert","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Within an increasingly resource-challenged food system, consumers need greater confidence in their ability to make better and more informed food choices. We investigated the role of trust as a moderator of the relationship between the motivation to make healthy, sustainable and novel food choices and the intention to actually do so, based on the reasoning that novel healthy and sustainable food products are marketed by credence attributes, where consumers must rely on information that is provided by food chain actors. In an online survey conducted in 13 European countries over two years with a sample of 25,610 respondents, we explored how social trust, beliefs in trustworthiness and overall trust moderate the motivation-intention relationship. Results show that while trust cannot compensate for a lack of motivation to engage in healthy or sustainable behaviours, the relationship between motivation and intention was strengthened by higher levels of trust for sustainable and innovative food choices, but not for healthy food choices, and this finding was largely consistent across both years. For sustainable choices, the motivation-intention relationship was moderated by trust in farmers and retailers but not in manufacturers or authorities. All types of trust moderated the motivation-intention relationship for adoption of novel foods. This has implications for investment in trust initiatives on the part of policymakers, food businesses and food system actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105386"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400288X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within an increasingly resource-challenged food system, consumers need greater confidence in their ability to make better and more informed food choices. We investigated the role of trust as a moderator of the relationship between the motivation to make healthy, sustainable and novel food choices and the intention to actually do so, based on the reasoning that novel healthy and sustainable food products are marketed by credence attributes, where consumers must rely on information that is provided by food chain actors. In an online survey conducted in 13 European countries over two years with a sample of 25,610 respondents, we explored how social trust, beliefs in trustworthiness and overall trust moderate the motivation-intention relationship. Results show that while trust cannot compensate for a lack of motivation to engage in healthy or sustainable behaviours, the relationship between motivation and intention was strengthened by higher levels of trust for sustainable and innovative food choices, but not for healthy food choices, and this finding was largely consistent across both years. For sustainable choices, the motivation-intention relationship was moderated by trust in farmers and retailers but not in manufacturers or authorities. All types of trust moderated the motivation-intention relationship for adoption of novel foods. This has implications for investment in trust initiatives on the part of policymakers, food businesses and food system actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么信任是至关重要的-信任在购买健康,可持续和新颖食品的动机和意图之间的关系中的调节作用
在一个日益面临资源挑战的粮食系统中,消费者需要对自己做出更好和更明智的食物选择的能力有更大的信心。我们调查了信任在做出健康、可持续和新颖食品选择的动机与实际这样做的意图之间的关系中的调节作用,基于新的健康和可持续食品产品通过信任属性进行营销的推理,消费者必须依赖食品链参与者提供的信息。在一项为期两年的在线调查中,我们在13个欧洲国家对25610名受访者进行了调查,探讨了社会信任、可信度信念和整体信任如何调节动机-意图关系。结果表明,虽然信任不能弥补缺乏参与健康或可持续行为的动机,但对可持续和创新食品选择的较高信任水平加强了动机和意图之间的关系,但对健康食品选择的信任水平却没有提高,这一发现在两年中基本一致。对于可持续选择,动机-意向关系受农民和零售商信任的调节,但不受制造商或当局信任的调节。所有类型的信任都调节了采用新食物的动机-意向关系。这对政策制定者、食品企业和食品系统参与者在信任倡议方面的投资产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Effects of personality traits and context congruency on participant engagement in traditional central location tests and congruent versus incongruent digital immersive environments during affective product testing Sweetening the experience: How designed immersive multisensory environments modify yogurt taste and mouthfeel perception A cross-cultural study on the consumer perception and acceptance of grass-derived ingredients in Denmark and Austria Sensing less, eating differently: menopause is associated with lower olfactory sensitivity and higher starch intake Beliefs versus environmental awareness: an extension of the theory of planned behavior to explore young consumers’ intentions toward insect flour-based pasta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1