Vivid images of future harm: The relationship between paranoia, prospective imagery and present moment awareness

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.113038
J.L Kingston , A. Dunford , A.K.C. Chau , S.H. So , V. Pile
{"title":"Vivid images of future harm: The relationship between paranoia, prospective imagery and present moment awareness","authors":"J.L Kingston ,&nbsp;A. Dunford ,&nbsp;A.K.C. Chau ,&nbsp;S.H. So ,&nbsp;V. Pile","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.113038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Paranoia describes an anxious over-anticipation of intentional harm from others, which is common in young adults. Whilst vivid emotional mental imagery (EMI) has an established role in understanding persecutory delusions, its association with paranoia in general population young adults is unknown. We tested whether the vividness of imagery for different types of negative future events differentiated paranoia from anxiety. Specifically, we varied future scenario content by virtue of interpersonal content and level of intentionality (non-interpersonal, interpersonal and interpersonal-intentional), as well as examining whether one's capacity for present moment awareness moderated the relationship between negative imagery and paranoia. The design was a cross-sectional survey with UK dwelling young adults (<em>n</em> = 120, 19.6 years). Participants completed questionnaires, including an adapted version of the Prospective Imagery Task. Paranoia was associated with experiencing more vivid negative imagery for future events that were interpersonal and intentional in nature, whereas anxiety was associated with future negative imagery of non-interpersonal content. A lower ability to remain in the present moment intensified the relationship between imagery vividness and paranoia. These findings provide a first step in understanding a potentially important relationship between prospective imagery and paranoia and provide a springboard to develop novel approaches to expand our repertoire of interventions for young adults with paranoia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 113038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924004987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paranoia describes an anxious over-anticipation of intentional harm from others, which is common in young adults. Whilst vivid emotional mental imagery (EMI) has an established role in understanding persecutory delusions, its association with paranoia in general population young adults is unknown. We tested whether the vividness of imagery for different types of negative future events differentiated paranoia from anxiety. Specifically, we varied future scenario content by virtue of interpersonal content and level of intentionality (non-interpersonal, interpersonal and interpersonal-intentional), as well as examining whether one's capacity for present moment awareness moderated the relationship between negative imagery and paranoia. The design was a cross-sectional survey with UK dwelling young adults (n = 120, 19.6 years). Participants completed questionnaires, including an adapted version of the Prospective Imagery Task. Paranoia was associated with experiencing more vivid negative imagery for future events that were interpersonal and intentional in nature, whereas anxiety was associated with future negative imagery of non-interpersonal content. A lower ability to remain in the present moment intensified the relationship between imagery vividness and paranoia. These findings provide a first step in understanding a potentially important relationship between prospective imagery and paranoia and provide a springboard to develop novel approaches to expand our repertoire of interventions for young adults with paranoia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来伤害的生动形象:偏执、前瞻性意象和当下时刻意识之间的关系
偏执狂指的是对他人故意伤害的焦虑过度预期,这在年轻人中很常见。虽然生动的情绪心理意象(EMI)在理解受迫害妄想方面发挥了既定的作用,但它与普通人群中年轻人的偏执狂的关系尚不清楚。我们测试了不同类型的负面未来事件的图像的生动度是否区分偏执和焦虑。具体来说,我们通过人际内容和意向性水平(非人际、人际和人际-意向性)来改变未来情景内容,并检查一个人的当下意识能力是否调节了消极意象和偏执之间的关系。该设计是对英国居住的年轻人(n = 120, 19.6岁)进行横断面调查。参与者完成了问卷调查,其中包括一个改编版本的前瞻性想象任务。偏执狂与对人际关系和故意的未来事件的更生动的负面意象有关,而焦虑与对非人际关系内容的未来负面意象有关。停留在当下的能力较低,强化了意象生动与偏执之间的关系。这些发现为理解前瞻性意象和偏执之间潜在的重要关系提供了第一步,并为开发新方法提供了跳板,以扩大我们对患有偏执的年轻人的干预手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI) Proportionality as a predictor of utilitarian sacrifices: Evidence from the Polish MFQ-2 Sensing a rift in reality: Validation of the self-world existential isolation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1