Lies in the dark: An analysis of dark personality traits and dishonesty

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113161
Peyton G. Yarbrough, Christian L. Hart
{"title":"Lies in the dark: An analysis of dark personality traits and dishonesty","authors":"Peyton G. Yarbrough,&nbsp;Christian L. Hart","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research examining the link between dishonesty and malevolent personality traits has focused on the dark triad of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism (<span><span>Jonason et al., 2014</span></span>; <span><span>Paulhus &amp; Williams, 2002</span></span>). Recent research has proposed a broader model of dark traits, the dark core of personality (<span><span>Moshagen et al., 2018</span></span>). This correlational study aimed to investigate the connection between various types of lying behavior and the dark core of personality including the Lying Profile Questionnaire (<span><span>Makowski et al., 2023</span></span>), the 24-Hour Lie Question (<span><span>Hart et al., 2019</span></span>), the Revised Lie Acceptability Scale (<span><span>Oliveira &amp; Levine, 2008</span></span>), the Three Factor Lying Scale (<span><span>Hart et al., 2020</span></span>), the D70 (<span><span>Moshagen et al., 2020</span></span>), the honesty-humility scale from the HEXACO-60 (<span><span>Ashton &amp; Lee, 2009</span></span>), and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability short form (<span><span>Crowne &amp; Marlowe, 1960</span></span>; <span><span>Reynolds, 1982</span></span>). 537 participants completed questionnaires about lying behaviors and dark core personality trait measures. Results indicated that those with dark personality traits tend to lie more often and accept lying in everyday situations. Additionally, dark traits were correlated with an increased frequency of telling self-serving and vindictive lies but not altruistic lies. Specific themes within the dark core also had predictive power for specific types of lies. The results of this study suggest that dark traits are not universal predictors of lying; they are associated with a greater tendency to lie malevolently, but not benevolently.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 113161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research examining the link between dishonesty and malevolent personality traits has focused on the dark triad of Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism (Jonason et al., 2014; Paulhus & Williams, 2002). Recent research has proposed a broader model of dark traits, the dark core of personality (Moshagen et al., 2018). This correlational study aimed to investigate the connection between various types of lying behavior and the dark core of personality including the Lying Profile Questionnaire (Makowski et al., 2023), the 24-Hour Lie Question (Hart et al., 2019), the Revised Lie Acceptability Scale (Oliveira & Levine, 2008), the Three Factor Lying Scale (Hart et al., 2020), the D70 (Moshagen et al., 2020), the honesty-humility scale from the HEXACO-60 (Ashton & Lee, 2009), and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability short form (Crowne & Marlowe, 1960; Reynolds, 1982). 537 participants completed questionnaires about lying behaviors and dark core personality trait measures. Results indicated that those with dark personality traits tend to lie more often and accept lying in everyday situations. Additionally, dark traits were correlated with an increased frequency of telling self-serving and vindictive lies but not altruistic lies. Specific themes within the dark core also had predictive power for specific types of lies. The results of this study suggest that dark traits are not universal predictors of lying; they are associated with a greater tendency to lie malevolently, but not benevolently.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑暗中的谎言:对黑暗人格特征和不诚实的分析
之前关于不诚实与恶意人格特征之间关系的研究主要集中在马基雅维利主义、精神病和自恋的黑暗三合一(jonathan et al., 2014;Paulhus,威廉姆斯,2002)。最近的研究提出了一个更广泛的黑暗特征模型,即人格的黑暗核心(Moshagen et al., 2018)。这项相关研究旨在调查各种类型的谎言行为与人格黑暗核心之间的联系,包括谎言概况问卷(Makowski等人,2023),24小时谎言问题(Hart等人,2019),修订谎言可接受度量表(Oliveira等人,2019);Levine, 2008),三因素撒谎量表(Hart et al., 2020), D70 (Moshagen et al., 2020), HEXACO-60中的诚实-谦卑量表(Ashton &;Lee, 2009),以及marlow -Crowne社会可取性简短形式(Crowne &;马洛,1960;雷诺兹,1982)。537名参与者完成了关于撒谎行为和黑暗核心人格特征测量的问卷调查。结果表明,具有黑暗人格特征的人更容易撒谎,并且在日常生活中接受谎言。此外,黑暗性格与自私自利和报复性谎言的频率增加有关,而与利他主义谎言无关。黑暗核心中的特定主题也对特定类型的谎言具有预测能力。这项研究的结果表明,性格阴暗并不是撒谎的普遍预测因素;他们更倾向于恶意撒谎,而不是善意地撒谎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI) Proportionality as a predictor of utilitarian sacrifices: Evidence from the Polish MFQ-2 Sensing a rift in reality: Validation of the self-world existential isolation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1