Assessment of the resilience factors associated with European green efficiency

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-25 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178643
C. Calafat-Marzal , V. Vega , V. Sanz-Torro , R. Puertas
{"title":"Assessment of the resilience factors associated with European green efficiency","authors":"C. Calafat-Marzal ,&nbsp;V. Vega ,&nbsp;V. Sanz-Torro ,&nbsp;R. Puertas","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change mitigation and socio-economic sustainability are high on the agendas of major world leaders. The European Union (EU) leads efforts in this regard by broadening sustainability to include climate neutrality, biodiversity, and social equity. This research provides novel insights into EU Member States' progress towards sustainability goals and the factors enhancing their resilience to environmental and socio-economic challenges. It thus contributes to the green transition by meeting a threefold objective: (1) to quantify efficiency, differentiating between the two stages that define the green revolution—climate change mitigation and social protection/adaptation; (2) to assess whether productivity changes are due to better resource use or technological advances; and (3) to determine the resilience factors (economic, social, and institutional) associated with this process. The methods used are two-stage DEA-bootstrap, the Sequential Malmquist Index and the Generalized Method of Moments, applied to the EU for the period 2013–2022. The results show a lack of homogeneity across Europe in achieving established goals, both in terms of efficiency levels and in productivity advances. The latter come almost exclusively from technological innovations, with limited attention given to improving the use of available resources. Furthermore, <em>GDP</em> per capita, the <em>employment rate</em> and <em>active labour market policies</em> stand out as the resilience factors that have the greatest influence on ecological efficiency levels. Accordingly, a practical application of the research findings would be to strengthen these factors. This recommendation provides a basis for guiding policies and strategies that facilitate continuous adaptation in the face of environmental adversity, thus helping to build a sustainable society that can respond flexibly to future events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"966 ","pages":"Article 178643"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725002773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change mitigation and socio-economic sustainability are high on the agendas of major world leaders. The European Union (EU) leads efforts in this regard by broadening sustainability to include climate neutrality, biodiversity, and social equity. This research provides novel insights into EU Member States' progress towards sustainability goals and the factors enhancing their resilience to environmental and socio-economic challenges. It thus contributes to the green transition by meeting a threefold objective: (1) to quantify efficiency, differentiating between the two stages that define the green revolution—climate change mitigation and social protection/adaptation; (2) to assess whether productivity changes are due to better resource use or technological advances; and (3) to determine the resilience factors (economic, social, and institutional) associated with this process. The methods used are two-stage DEA-bootstrap, the Sequential Malmquist Index and the Generalized Method of Moments, applied to the EU for the period 2013–2022. The results show a lack of homogeneity across Europe in achieving established goals, both in terms of efficiency levels and in productivity advances. The latter come almost exclusively from technological innovations, with limited attention given to improving the use of available resources. Furthermore, GDP per capita, the employment rate and active labour market policies stand out as the resilience factors that have the greatest influence on ecological efficiency levels. Accordingly, a practical application of the research findings would be to strengthen these factors. This recommendation provides a basis for guiding policies and strategies that facilitate continuous adaptation in the face of environmental adversity, thus helping to build a sustainable society that can respond flexibly to future events.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与欧洲绿色效率相关的弹性因素评估
缓解气候变化和社会经济可持续性是世界主要领导人议程上的重要议题。欧盟在这方面发挥领导作用,将可持续性扩大到气候中立、生物多样性和社会公平。这项研究为欧盟成员国在实现可持续发展目标方面的进展以及增强其应对环境和社会经济挑战的能力的因素提供了新的见解。因此,它通过实现三重目标来促进绿色转型:(1)量化效率,区分界定绿色革命的两个阶段——减缓气候变化和社会保护/适应;(2)评估生产力的变化是否由于资源的更好利用或技术的进步;(3)确定与此过程相关的弹性因素(经济、社会和制度)。使用的方法是两阶段DEA-bootstrap,顺序Malmquist指数和广义矩量法,应用于2013-2022年期间的欧盟。结果表明,在实现既定目标方面,欧洲各国缺乏同质性,无论是在效率水平还是在生产力进步方面。后者几乎完全来自技术革新,很少注意改进现有资源的使用。此外,人均国内生产总值、就业率和积极的劳动力市场政策是对生态效率水平影响最大的弹性因素。因此,研究结果的实际应用将是加强这些因素。这一建议为指导政策和战略提供了基础,以促进面对环境逆境时的持续适应,从而有助于建立一个能够灵活应对未来事件的可持续社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Wildfire impacts on groundwater recharge in mountain catchments The consequences of the energy transition: Evidence from North America, Europe, and China A Bayesian inversion of TROPOMI methane observations over South Africa: Implications for bottom-up inventories A combined electron and synchrotron micro- and nano-scale exploration of light rare earth element distribution and speciation in bauxite residues of lateritic and karstic origin Persistent organic pollutants in India: Multi-compartment trends, source fingerprinting, and emerging environmental challenges (2000–2025)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1