Angelina R. Sutin , Martina Luchetti , Selin Karakose , Yannick Stephan , André Hajek , Antonio Terracciano
{"title":"Person, temporal, and contextual predictors of momentary purpose in everyday life","authors":"Angelina R. Sutin , Martina Luchetti , Selin Karakose , Yannick Stephan , André Hajek , Antonio Terracciano","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent theoretical and empirical advances in purpose in life indicate a state component to feeling purposeful. This study used a micro-longitudinal study to identify person (age, sex, race, education), temporal (day in study, time of day, weekend), and broad (at work, with others) and specific (e.g., eating/drinking, shopping) contextual factors associated with momentary feelings of purpose. Participants (<em>N</em> = 303; age range 40–70) reported their momentary purpose three times a day for eight days and what they were doing at the time of the alert for the survey. Relatively older participants (b = 0.36, SE = 0.13, p = .007) reported more momentary purpose compared to relatively younger participants. Participants reported more purpose in the afternoon (b = 2.18, SE = 0.62, p < .001) and less purpose on weekends (b = −1.37, SE = 0.62, p = .027). The broad contextual factors were associated with purpose: Participants reported being more purpose-driven at work (b = 9.30, SE = 0.71, p < .001) or with others (b = 2.15, SE = 0.57, p < .001) compared to not at work or alone, respectively. Specific contextual factors were associated with feeling more purpose-driven (e.g., caregiving b = 14.17, SE = 1.99, p < .001; exercising b = 15.59, SE = 1.65, p < .001), except leisure activities, which were associated with less purpose (b = −4.76, SE = 0.99, p < .001). Feeling purposeful varies across moments and is sensitive to time of day, location, and activities engaged in.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent theoretical and empirical advances in purpose in life indicate a state component to feeling purposeful. This study used a micro-longitudinal study to identify person (age, sex, race, education), temporal (day in study, time of day, weekend), and broad (at work, with others) and specific (e.g., eating/drinking, shopping) contextual factors associated with momentary feelings of purpose. Participants (N = 303; age range 40–70) reported their momentary purpose three times a day for eight days and what they were doing at the time of the alert for the survey. Relatively older participants (b = 0.36, SE = 0.13, p = .007) reported more momentary purpose compared to relatively younger participants. Participants reported more purpose in the afternoon (b = 2.18, SE = 0.62, p < .001) and less purpose on weekends (b = −1.37, SE = 0.62, p = .027). The broad contextual factors were associated with purpose: Participants reported being more purpose-driven at work (b = 9.30, SE = 0.71, p < .001) or with others (b = 2.15, SE = 0.57, p < .001) compared to not at work or alone, respectively. Specific contextual factors were associated with feeling more purpose-driven (e.g., caregiving b = 14.17, SE = 1.99, p < .001; exercising b = 15.59, SE = 1.65, p < .001), except leisure activities, which were associated with less purpose (b = −4.76, SE = 0.99, p < .001). Feeling purposeful varies across moments and is sensitive to time of day, location, and activities engaged in.
最近关于生活目的的理论和经验进展表明,感觉有目的的状态成分。本研究采用微观纵向研究来确定与瞬间目的感相关的个人(年龄、性别、种族、教育程度)、时间(学习日期、一天中的时间、周末)、广泛(工作中、与他人)和具体(例如,饮食、购物)背景因素。参与者(N = 303;年龄在40-70岁之间)的人每天三次报告他们的短暂目的,持续8天,以及他们在调查警报发出时正在做什么。相对年长的参与者(b = 0.36, SE = 0.13, p = .007)比相对年轻的参与者报告了更多的瞬间目的。参与者在下午报告了更多的目标(b = 2.18, SE = 0.62, p <;.001)和周末较少的目的(b = - 1.37, SE = 0.62, p = 0.027)。广泛的背景因素与目标相关:参与者报告在工作中更有目标驱动(b = 9.30, SE = 0.71, p <;措施)或与他人(b = 2.15, = 0.57, p & lt;.001),与不工作或独自一人相比。特定情境因素与感觉更多的目的驱动相关(例如,照顾b = 14.17, SE = 1.99, p <;措施;b = 15.59, SE = 1.65, p <;.001),但休闲活动与目的性较低相关(b = - 4.76, SE = 0.99, p <;措施)。目标感在不同时刻有所不同,并且对一天中的时间、地点和所从事的活动很敏感。
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.