Person, temporal, and contextual predictors of momentary purpose in everyday life

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113087
Angelina R. Sutin , Martina Luchetti , Selin Karakose , Yannick Stephan , André Hajek , Antonio Terracciano
{"title":"Person, temporal, and contextual predictors of momentary purpose in everyday life","authors":"Angelina R. Sutin ,&nbsp;Martina Luchetti ,&nbsp;Selin Karakose ,&nbsp;Yannick Stephan ,&nbsp;André Hajek ,&nbsp;Antonio Terracciano","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent theoretical and empirical advances in purpose in life indicate a state component to feeling purposeful. This study used a micro-longitudinal study to identify person (age, sex, race, education), temporal (day in study, time of day, weekend), and broad (at work, with others) and specific (e.g., eating/drinking, shopping) contextual factors associated with momentary feelings of purpose. Participants (<em>N</em> = 303; age range 40–70) reported their momentary purpose three times a day for eight days and what they were doing at the time of the alert for the survey. Relatively older participants (b = 0.36, SE = 0.13, p = .007) reported more momentary purpose compared to relatively younger participants. Participants reported more purpose in the afternoon (b = 2.18, SE = 0.62, p &lt; .001) and less purpose on weekends (b = −1.37, SE = 0.62, p = .027). The broad contextual factors were associated with purpose: Participants reported being more purpose-driven at work (b = 9.30, SE = 0.71, p &lt; .001) or with others (b = 2.15, SE = 0.57, p &lt; .001) compared to not at work or alone, respectively. Specific contextual factors were associated with feeling more purpose-driven (e.g., caregiving b = 14.17, SE = 1.99, p &lt; .001; exercising b = 15.59, SE = 1.65, p &lt; .001), except leisure activities, which were associated with less purpose (b = −4.76, SE = 0.99, p &lt; .001). Feeling purposeful varies across moments and is sensitive to time of day, location, and activities engaged in.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent theoretical and empirical advances in purpose in life indicate a state component to feeling purposeful. This study used a micro-longitudinal study to identify person (age, sex, race, education), temporal (day in study, time of day, weekend), and broad (at work, with others) and specific (e.g., eating/drinking, shopping) contextual factors associated with momentary feelings of purpose. Participants (N = 303; age range 40–70) reported their momentary purpose three times a day for eight days and what they were doing at the time of the alert for the survey. Relatively older participants (b = 0.36, SE = 0.13, p = .007) reported more momentary purpose compared to relatively younger participants. Participants reported more purpose in the afternoon (b = 2.18, SE = 0.62, p < .001) and less purpose on weekends (b = −1.37, SE = 0.62, p = .027). The broad contextual factors were associated with purpose: Participants reported being more purpose-driven at work (b = 9.30, SE = 0.71, p < .001) or with others (b = 2.15, SE = 0.57, p < .001) compared to not at work or alone, respectively. Specific contextual factors were associated with feeling more purpose-driven (e.g., caregiving b = 14.17, SE = 1.99, p < .001; exercising b = 15.59, SE = 1.65, p < .001), except leisure activities, which were associated with less purpose (b = −4.76, SE = 0.99, p < .001). Feeling purposeful varies across moments and is sensitive to time of day, location, and activities engaged in.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日常生活中瞬间目的的人、时间和语境预测因素
最近关于生活目的的理论和经验进展表明,感觉有目的的状态成分。本研究采用微观纵向研究来确定与瞬间目的感相关的个人(年龄、性别、种族、教育程度)、时间(学习日期、一天中的时间、周末)、广泛(工作中、与他人)和具体(例如,饮食、购物)背景因素。参与者(N = 303;年龄在40-70岁之间)的人每天三次报告他们的短暂目的,持续8天,以及他们在调查警报发出时正在做什么。相对年长的参与者(b = 0.36, SE = 0.13, p = .007)比相对年轻的参与者报告了更多的瞬间目的。参与者在下午报告了更多的目标(b = 2.18, SE = 0.62, p <;.001)和周末较少的目的(b = - 1.37, SE = 0.62, p = 0.027)。广泛的背景因素与目标相关:参与者报告在工作中更有目标驱动(b = 9.30, SE = 0.71, p <;措施)或与他人(b = 2.15, = 0.57, p & lt;.001),与不工作或独自一人相比。特定情境因素与感觉更多的目的驱动相关(例如,照顾b = 14.17, SE = 1.99, p <;措施;b = 15.59, SE = 1.65, p <;.001),但休闲活动与目的性较低相关(b = - 4.76, SE = 0.99, p <;措施)。目标感在不同时刻有所不同,并且对一天中的时间、地点和所从事的活动很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Charisma is not just for the bold: Connecting tripartite narcissism and self-reports of charisma aspects Social support and prosocial decisions in times of distress: Helping a single recipient versus multiple recipients Development and validation of the individual and social music listening scale (ISMUS-LI) Proportionality as a predictor of utilitarian sacrifices: Evidence from the Polish MFQ-2 Sensing a rift in reality: Validation of the self-world existential isolation scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1