Exploring the associations among relationship-related attitudes, affection deprivation, and faking orgasm among heterosexual women in the United States

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113079
Amanda Denes , Thana Suppiah , Margaret Bennett-Brown , Amanda N. Gesselman
{"title":"Exploring the associations among relationship-related attitudes, affection deprivation, and faking orgasm among heterosexual women in the United States","authors":"Amanda Denes ,&nbsp;Thana Suppiah ,&nbsp;Margaret Bennett-Brown ,&nbsp;Amanda N. Gesselman","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study explored the associations among relationship-related (RR) attitudes, feeling deprived of affectionate touch, and the frequency of faking orgasm among a sample of 723 heterosexual women in the United States (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 39.63, 60.9% White) who were single at the time of survey completion. Contrary to the study hypotheses, the results revealed that RR attitudes (i.e., interest in seeking a committed relationship, preference for sex in a committed relationship, and readiness for a relationship) were not associated with a greater frequency of faking orgasm, and feeling deprived of affection did not moderate these associations. Further, a greater preference for sex within a committed romantic relationship was associated with faking orgasm <em>less</em> frequently, contrary to what was predicted. Post hoc analyses revealed that feeling deprived of affectionate touch was associated with more frequently faking orgasm. Additionally, among a restricted sample of women who had been single for the prior year, no significant associations emerged between RR attitudes and faking orgasm. The findings provide support for aspects of affection exchange theory and suggest that affection deprivation may be a more meaningful predictor of heterosexual women's tendencies to fake orgasm than their RR attitudes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study explored the associations among relationship-related (RR) attitudes, feeling deprived of affectionate touch, and the frequency of faking orgasm among a sample of 723 heterosexual women in the United States (Mage = 39.63, 60.9% White) who were single at the time of survey completion. Contrary to the study hypotheses, the results revealed that RR attitudes (i.e., interest in seeking a committed relationship, preference for sex in a committed relationship, and readiness for a relationship) were not associated with a greater frequency of faking orgasm, and feeling deprived of affection did not moderate these associations. Further, a greater preference for sex within a committed romantic relationship was associated with faking orgasm less frequently, contrary to what was predicted. Post hoc analyses revealed that feeling deprived of affectionate touch was associated with more frequently faking orgasm. Additionally, among a restricted sample of women who had been single for the prior year, no significant associations emerged between RR attitudes and faking orgasm. The findings provide support for aspects of affection exchange theory and suggest that affection deprivation may be a more meaningful predictor of heterosexual women's tendencies to fake orgasm than their RR attitudes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国异性恋女性中探讨关系相关态度、情感剥夺和假装性高潮之间的联系
本研究以723名在调查完成时单身的美国异性恋女性(白人= 39.63,白人= 60.9%)为样本,探讨了关系相关(RR)态度、被剥夺深情触摸的感觉和假装性高潮频率之间的联系。与研究假设相反,结果显示RR态度(即对寻找一段稳定关系的兴趣,在稳定关系中对性的偏好,以及对一段关系的准备)与更高频率的假装性高潮无关,而且感觉被剥夺了感情并没有缓和这些关联。此外,在一段忠诚的恋爱关系中,对性的更大偏好与假装性高潮的频率有关,这与预测相反。事后分析显示,缺乏亲密接触的感觉与更频繁地假装性高潮有关。此外,在前一年单身的女性样本中,RR态度和假装性高潮之间没有明显的联系。这些发现为情感交换理论提供了支持,并表明情感剥夺可能是异性恋女性假装性高潮倾向的更有意义的预测因素,而不是她们的RR态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Moral foundations in the 2020s: Advancements in measurement, genetics, brain science, and real-world impact Interpersonal stressors, interpersonal sensitivity, and loneliness among college students: Disentangling between- and within-person associations Sociosexuality in men and women: Considering core self-judgments and (im)moral orientations Individual differences in adolescents' digital well-being: How perceived stress, fear of missing out, and self-control interact in daily life Is consideration of future consequences consistent across specific domains? A latent profile analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1