Quantification of Motor Learning in Hand Adjustability Movements: An Evaluation Variable for Discriminant Cognitive Decline

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1109/JTEHM.2025.3540203
Kazuya Toshima;Yu Chokki;Toshiaki Wasaka;Tsukasa Tamaru;Yoshifumi Morita
{"title":"Quantification of Motor Learning in Hand Adjustability Movements: An Evaluation Variable for Discriminant Cognitive Decline","authors":"Kazuya Toshima;Yu Chokki;Toshiaki Wasaka;Tsukasa Tamaru;Yoshifumi Morita","doi":"10.1109/JTEHM.2025.3540203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is characterized by early symptoms of attentional decline and may be distinguished through motor learning results. A relationship was reported between dexterous hand movements and cognitive function in older adults. Therefore, this study focuses on motor learning involving dexterous hand movements. As motor learning engages two distinct types of attention, external and internal, we aimed to develop an evaluation method that separates these attentional functions within motor learning. The objective of this study was to develop and verify the effectiveness of this evaluation method. The effectiveness was assessed by comparing two motor learning variables between a normal cognitive (NC) and MCI groups. Method: To evaluate motor learning through dexterous hand movements, we utilized the iWakka device. Two types of visual tracking tasks, repeat and random, were designed to evaluate motor learning from different aspects. The tracking errors in both tasks were quantitatively measured, and the initial and final improvement rates during motor learning were defined as the evaluation variables. The study included 28 MCI participants and 40 NC participants, and the effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by comparing results between the groups. Results: The repeat task revealed a significantly lower learning rate in MCI participants (p <0.01). In contrast, no significant difference was observed between MCI and NC participants in the random task (p =0.67). Conclusion: The evaluation method proposed in this study demonstrated the possibility of obtaining evaluation variables that indicate the characteristics of MCI. Clinical Impact: The methods proposed in this work are clinically relevant because the proposed evaluation system can make evaluation variables for discriminating cognitive decline in MCI. That it, the proposed approach can also be used to provide discrimination for cognitive decline in MCI.","PeriodicalId":54255,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm","volume":"13 ","pages":"75-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10879071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10879071/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is characterized by early symptoms of attentional decline and may be distinguished through motor learning results. A relationship was reported between dexterous hand movements and cognitive function in older adults. Therefore, this study focuses on motor learning involving dexterous hand movements. As motor learning engages two distinct types of attention, external and internal, we aimed to develop an evaluation method that separates these attentional functions within motor learning. The objective of this study was to develop and verify the effectiveness of this evaluation method. The effectiveness was assessed by comparing two motor learning variables between a normal cognitive (NC) and MCI groups. Method: To evaluate motor learning through dexterous hand movements, we utilized the iWakka device. Two types of visual tracking tasks, repeat and random, were designed to evaluate motor learning from different aspects. The tracking errors in both tasks were quantitatively measured, and the initial and final improvement rates during motor learning were defined as the evaluation variables. The study included 28 MCI participants and 40 NC participants, and the effectiveness of the proposed method was verified by comparing results between the groups. Results: The repeat task revealed a significantly lower learning rate in MCI participants (p <0.01). In contrast, no significant difference was observed between MCI and NC participants in the random task (p =0.67). Conclusion: The evaluation method proposed in this study demonstrated the possibility of obtaining evaluation variables that indicate the characteristics of MCI. Clinical Impact: The methods proposed in this work are clinically relevant because the proposed evaluation system can make evaluation variables for discriminating cognitive decline in MCI. That it, the proposed approach can also be used to provide discrimination for cognitive decline in MCI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:轻度认知障碍(MCI)的特点是早期出现注意力下降的症状,并可通过运动学习结果加以区分。有报道称,老年人的灵巧手部动作与认知功能之间存在关系。因此,本研究侧重于涉及灵巧手部动作的运动学习。由于运动学习涉及外部和内部两种不同类型的注意力,我们旨在开发一种评估方法,将运动学习中的这些注意力功能区分开来。本研究的目的是开发并验证这种评估方法的有效性。通过比较正常认知(NC)组和 MCI 组的两个运动学习变量来评估其有效性。研究方法为了通过灵巧的手部动作评估运动学习,我们使用了 iWakka 设备。我们设计了重复和随机两种视觉跟踪任务,以从不同方面评估运动学习。我们对这两种任务中的跟踪误差进行了定量测量,并将运动学习过程中的初始改善率和最终改善率定义为评估变量。研究对象包括 28 名 MCI 参与者和 40 名 NC 参与者,通过比较两组之间的结果验证了所建议方法的有效性。结果显示重复任务显示 MCI 参与者的学习率明显较低(P <0.01)。相反,在随机任务中,MCI 和 NC 参与者之间没有观察到明显差异(P =0.67)。结论本研究提出的评估方法表明,有可能获得显示 MCI 特征的评估变量。临床影响:本研究提出的方法具有临床意义,因为所提出的评价系统可以得出用于判别 MCI 认知功能下降的评价变量。因此,所提出的方法也可用于鉴别 MCI 患者的认知功能衰退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine is an open access product that bridges the engineering and clinical worlds, focusing on detailed descriptions of advanced technical solutions to a clinical need along with clinical results and healthcare relevance. The journal provides a platform for state-of-the-art technology directions in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, embracing engineering, life sciences and medicine. A unique aspect of the journal is its ability to foster a collaboration between physicians and engineers for presenting broad and compelling real world technological and engineering solutions that can be implemented in the interest of improving quality of patient care and treatment outcomes, thereby reducing costs and improving efficiency. The journal provides an active forum for clinical research and relevant state-of the-art technology for members of all the IEEE societies that have an interest in biomedical engineering as well as reaching out directly to physicians and the medical community through the American Medical Association (AMA) and other clinical societies. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited, to topics on: Medical devices, healthcare delivery systems, global healthcare initiatives, and ICT based services; Technological relevance to healthcare cost reduction; Technology affecting healthcare management, decision-making, and policy; Advanced technical work that is applied to solving specific clinical needs.
期刊最新文献
Quantification of Motor Learning in Hand Adjustability Movements: An Evaluation Variable for Discriminant Cognitive Decline Cross-Modal Augmented Transformer for Automated Medical Report Generation Multi-Branch CNN-LSTM Fusion Network-Driven System With BERT Semantic Evaluator for Radiology Reporting in Emergency Head CTs Intelligent Neonatal Blood Perfusion Assessment System Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Design and Development of an Integrated Virtual Reality (VR)-Based Training System for Difficult Airway Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1