The Multiple Streams Framework and Non-Politicized Issues: The Case of Assisted Dying/Assisted Suicide

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1111/polp.70016

Ian Bache

{"title":"The Multiple Streams Framework and Non-Politicized Issues: The Case of Assisted Dying/Assisted Suicide","authors":"Ian Bache","doi":"10.1111/polp.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This article applies agenda-setting theory, and the multiple streams framework in particular, to consider why assisted dying/assisted suicide (AD/AS) has not been legalized in the United Kingdom, and also what the prospects are for policy change. AD/AS provides an interesting test case for agenda-setting theory, which tends to focus on governmental agendas (Kingdon 2011, 3) and has thus been said to ‘say less about the policy outcomes of such nonpoliticized policy processes’ (Green-Pedersen 2007, 286) that generally characterize morality polices. Agenda-setting theory provides valuable insights into this case, which reveals an important role for government even on this free vote matter of conscience. However, the case highlights aspects of agenda-setting theory relating to assumptions on legitimacy and the power of persuasion that fare less well, and which have implications for the future study of morality policies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Angervil, G. 2021. “A Comprehensive Application of Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework: An Analysis of the Obama Administration's No Child Left Behind Waiver Policy.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 49, no. 5: 980–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12432.</p>\n \n <p>Knackmuhs, E., Farmer, J., and Knapp, D. 2020. “The Interaction of Policy Narratives, Moral Politics, and Criminal Justice Policy Beliefs.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 48, no. 2: 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12343.</p>\n \n <p>Silagadze, N. 2021. “Abortion Referendums: Is There a Recipe for Success?” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 49, no. 2: 352–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12398.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article applies agenda-setting theory, and the multiple streams framework in particular, to consider why assisted dying/assisted suicide (AD/AS) has not been legalized in the United Kingdom, and also what the prospects are for policy change. AD/AS provides an interesting test case for agenda-setting theory, which tends to focus on governmental agendas (Kingdon 2011, 3) and has thus been said to ‘say less about the policy outcomes of such nonpoliticized policy processes’ (Green-Pedersen 2007, 286) that generally characterize morality polices. Agenda-setting theory provides valuable insights into this case, which reveals an important role for government even on this free vote matter of conscience. However, the case highlights aspects of agenda-setting theory relating to assumptions on legitimacy and the power of persuasion that fare less well, and which have implications for the future study of morality policies.

Angervil, G. 2021. “A Comprehensive Application of Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework: An Analysis of the Obama Administration's No Child Left Behind Waiver Policy.” Politics & Policy 49, no. 5: 980–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12432.

Knackmuhs, E., Farmer, J., and Knapp, D. 2020. “The Interaction of Policy Narratives, Moral Politics, and Criminal Justice Policy Beliefs.” Politics & Policy 48, no. 2: 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12343.

Silagadze, N. 2021. “Abortion Referendums: Is There a Recipe for Success?” Politics & Policy 49, no. 2: 352–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12398.

查看原文