When Movements Change Policies: Popular Legislative Initiatives in Favor of Housing Rights in Spain

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1111/polp.70001
Montserrat Emperador Badimon, Marcos Ancelovici
{"title":"When Movements Change Policies: Popular Legislative Initiatives in Favor of Housing Rights in Spain","authors":"Montserrat Emperador Badimon,&nbsp;Marcos Ancelovici","doi":"10.1111/polp.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The Spanish housing rights movement has been consistently demanding new regulations of the housing sector. In addition to protests, it has campaigned for popular legislative initiatives (PLI) that have generated different outcomes. How can we account for such variation? To address this question, this article compares three PLI campaigns for housing rights: the national PLI (2011–2013), the Catalan PLI (2014–2015), and the Madrid PLI (2017). Whereas the three PLIs collected enough signatures to be submitted to congress, only two managed to pass the first stage of the legislative process, and only one was eventually turned into law. This study argues that these legislative outcomes must be unpacked and disaggregated into concatenations of stages that were shaped by three processes: coalition building, salience building, and legitimacy building. It uses a process tracing method to show empirically how these dynamics unfolded in the three abovementioned PLIs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"53 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Spanish housing rights movement has been consistently demanding new regulations of the housing sector. In addition to protests, it has campaigned for popular legislative initiatives (PLI) that have generated different outcomes. How can we account for such variation? To address this question, this article compares three PLI campaigns for housing rights: the national PLI (2011–2013), the Catalan PLI (2014–2015), and the Madrid PLI (2017). Whereas the three PLIs collected enough signatures to be submitted to congress, only two managed to pass the first stage of the legislative process, and only one was eventually turned into law. This study argues that these legislative outcomes must be unpacked and disaggregated into concatenations of stages that were shaped by three processes: coalition building, salience building, and legitimacy building. It uses a process tracing method to show empirically how these dynamics unfolded in the three abovementioned PLIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当运动改变政策:西班牙支持住房权利的普遍立法倡议
西班牙住房权利运动一直要求对住房部门制定新的规定。除了抗议活动,它还发起了民众立法倡议(PLI),这些倡议产生了不同的结果。我们如何解释这种差异呢?为了解决这个问题,本文比较了三次关于住房权利的PLI运动:国家PLI(2011-2013),加泰罗尼亚PLI(2014-2015)和马德里PLI(2017)。尽管三个pli收集了足够的签名提交给国会,但只有两个成功地通过了立法程序的第一阶段,只有一个最终成为法律。本研究认为,这些立法成果必须被拆解并分解为由三个过程形成的阶段:联盟建设、突出地位建设和合法性建设。它使用过程跟踪方法来实证地显示这些动态如何在上述三个pli中展开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Coordinating Digital Responsibility: Public Perceptions of Content Governance in Non-Western Contexts Political Determinants of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Alignment, Competition, Executive Partisanship, and Electoral Cycles in South Korea Potential U.S. Tariffs and Vaccine Trade: An Analysis of Their Implications for Healthcare Quality Historical Institutionalism and Transnational Influence: Social Policy Responses to the Great Depression in the United States and Canada Terrorism and the Shadow Economy: A Panel Analysis for Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1