Self vs employer paid parking impact on mode choice – The Melbourne downtown commute in an era of driverless cars

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101022
Fuad Yasin Huda , Graham Currie , Allan Pimenta , Liton Md Kamruzzaman
{"title":"Self vs employer paid parking impact on mode choice – The Melbourne downtown commute in an era of driverless cars","authors":"Fuad Yasin Huda ,&nbsp;Graham Currie ,&nbsp;Allan Pimenta ,&nbsp;Liton Md Kamruzzaman","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2025.101022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Driverless Car (DC) has the potential to revolutionize the mode choice behaviour of downtown or CBD (Central Business District) commuters. This group generally experience high parking costs, which can potentially be eliminated due to the self-parking capabilities of DCs to access free-parking zones. However, it is unclear how this will impact mode switch behaviour in the DC era, and particularly, how current parking payment mechanisms (self vs. employer paid) will interact with future mode switch behaviour. This paper addresses these gaps by collecting and analysing data from 528 Melbourne CBD car commuters. Results from panel logistic regression indicate that on aggregate, 54% car commuters would opt to DC commuting. However, this proportion increases to 61% among self-paid parking commuters but drops to 47.6% for those with employer-paid parking, indicating a significant association between current parking payment arrangements and future intentions to use DCs for CBD commutes. Regression results show that travel cost, parking payment arrangement, individuals place of residence, DC demonstration approach and the degree of DC awareness have statistically significant impact on mode switch decision. Results will assist transport practitioners and legislators in understanding the association between parking payment arrangements and mode switch behaviour, along with the factors influencing this mode switch. This insight will also help policy advisors to plan in advance proactive travel demand and parking management planning with DCs in CBDs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101022"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X25000407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Driverless Car (DC) has the potential to revolutionize the mode choice behaviour of downtown or CBD (Central Business District) commuters. This group generally experience high parking costs, which can potentially be eliminated due to the self-parking capabilities of DCs to access free-parking zones. However, it is unclear how this will impact mode switch behaviour in the DC era, and particularly, how current parking payment mechanisms (self vs. employer paid) will interact with future mode switch behaviour. This paper addresses these gaps by collecting and analysing data from 528 Melbourne CBD car commuters. Results from panel logistic regression indicate that on aggregate, 54% car commuters would opt to DC commuting. However, this proportion increases to 61% among self-paid parking commuters but drops to 47.6% for those with employer-paid parking, indicating a significant association between current parking payment arrangements and future intentions to use DCs for CBD commutes. Regression results show that travel cost, parking payment arrangement, individuals place of residence, DC demonstration approach and the degree of DC awareness have statistically significant impact on mode switch decision. Results will assist transport practitioners and legislators in understanding the association between parking payment arrangements and mode switch behaviour, along with the factors influencing this mode switch. This insight will also help policy advisors to plan in advance proactive travel demand and parking management planning with DCs in CBDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自助与雇主付费停车对模式选择的影响——无人驾驶汽车时代的墨尔本市中心通勤
无人驾驶汽车(DC)有可能彻底改变市中心或CBD(中央商务区)通勤者的模式选择行为。这一群体的停车成本通常很高,但由于dc能够自行停车,从而进入免费停车区,这一成本可能会被消除。然而,目前尚不清楚这将如何影响DC时代的模式切换行为,特别是当前的停车付费机制(自付与雇主支付)将如何与未来的模式切换行为相互作用。本文通过收集和分析528名墨尔本CBD汽车通勤者的数据来解决这些差距。面板逻辑回归结果表明,54%的汽车通勤者会选择DC通勤。然而,在自费停车的通勤者中,这一比例上升到61%,而在雇主付费停车的通勤者中,这一比例下降到47.6%,这表明当前的停车支付安排与未来使用dc通勤CBD的意图之间存在显著关联。回归结果表明,出行成本、停车支付安排、个人居住地、DC示范方式和DC意识程度对模式切换决策有统计学显著影响。研究结果将有助于交通从业者和立法者理解停车支付安排和模式切换行为之间的关系,以及影响这种模式切换的因素。这一见解还将帮助政策顾问与cbd中的数据中心一起提前规划积极的出行需求和停车管理规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
(Un)Easy Riders: The real-world potential of integrating carpooling into digital travel planners Assessing automated vehicle-induced VMT: meta-analysis of current research Formation mechanisms of perceived accessibility in the digital era: A multidimensional S-O-R analysis with digital literacy modulation Integrating activity-based travel behavior into user equilibrium-constrained expansion planning of EV charging network: a bi-level programming approach Inferring daily mobility patterns from Google Maps Timeline: Opportunities and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1