Phosphate amendment drives bloom of RNA viruses after soil wet-up

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109791
Ella T. Sieradzki, G. Michael Allen, Jeffrey A. Kimbrel, Graeme W. Nicol, Christina Hazard, Erin Nuccio, Steven J. Blazewicz, Jennifer Pett-Ridge, Gareth Trubl
{"title":"Phosphate amendment drives bloom of RNA viruses after soil wet-up","authors":"Ella T. Sieradzki, G. Michael Allen, Jeffrey A. Kimbrel, Graeme W. Nicol, Christina Hazard, Erin Nuccio, Steven J. Blazewicz, Jennifer Pett-Ridge, Gareth Trubl","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil rewetting after a dry period results in a surge of activity and succession in both microbial and DNA virus communities. Less is known about the response of RNA viruses to soil rewetting—while they are highly diverse and widely distributed in soil, they remain understudied. We hypothesized that RNA viruses would show temporal succession following rewetting and that phosphate amendment would influence their trajectory, as viral proliferation may cause phosphorus limitation. Using 39 time-resolved metatranscriptomes and amplicon data, 2,190 RNA viral populations were identified across five phyla, with 26% of these predicted to infect bacteria, and 11% fungi. Only 1.2% of viral populations had annotated capsid genes, suggesting most persist via intracellular replication without a free virion phase. Phosphate amendment altered RNA viral community composition within the first week and amended vs. unamended communities remained distinguishable for up to three weeks. While the overall host community remained stable, certain bacterial populations showed reduced abundance in phosphate-amended soils, likely due to increased viral lysis, as RNA bacteriophages proliferated significantly. Notably, 60% of the viruses with increased abundance under phosphate amendment belonged to basal <em>Lenarviricota</em> clades rather than well-known groups like <em>Leviviricetes</em>. We estimate RNA bacteriophage infections may affect 10<sup>7</sup>–10<sup>9</sup> bacteria per gram of soil, aligning with the total bacterial population (10<sup>7</sup>–10<sup>10</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> soil), suggesting that RNA phages significantly influence bacterial communities post-wet-up, with phosphorus availability modulating this effect.","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109791","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil rewetting after a dry period results in a surge of activity and succession in both microbial and DNA virus communities. Less is known about the response of RNA viruses to soil rewetting—while they are highly diverse and widely distributed in soil, they remain understudied. We hypothesized that RNA viruses would show temporal succession following rewetting and that phosphate amendment would influence their trajectory, as viral proliferation may cause phosphorus limitation. Using 39 time-resolved metatranscriptomes and amplicon data, 2,190 RNA viral populations were identified across five phyla, with 26% of these predicted to infect bacteria, and 11% fungi. Only 1.2% of viral populations had annotated capsid genes, suggesting most persist via intracellular replication without a free virion phase. Phosphate amendment altered RNA viral community composition within the first week and amended vs. unamended communities remained distinguishable for up to three weeks. While the overall host community remained stable, certain bacterial populations showed reduced abundance in phosphate-amended soils, likely due to increased viral lysis, as RNA bacteriophages proliferated significantly. Notably, 60% of the viruses with increased abundance under phosphate amendment belonged to basal Lenarviricota clades rather than well-known groups like Leviviricetes. We estimate RNA bacteriophage infections may affect 107–109 bacteria per gram of soil, aligning with the total bacterial population (107–1010 g−1 soil), suggesting that RNA phages significantly influence bacterial communities post-wet-up, with phosphorus availability modulating this effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Phosphate amendment drives bloom of RNA viruses after soil wet-up Gross soil phosphorus fluxes remain constant along forest recovery trajectories in central Africa How do root exudates prime the decomposition of soil organic matter following drought? Drought increases microbial allocation to stress tolerance but with few tradeoffs among community-level traits Hidden decomposers: Revisiting saprotrophy among soil protists and its potential impact on carbon cycling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1