How do root exudates prime the decomposition of soil organic matter following drought?

IF 10.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109789
Meng Na , Lettice C. Hicks , Johannes Rousk
{"title":"How do root exudates prime the decomposition of soil organic matter following drought?","authors":"Meng Na ,&nbsp;Lettice C. Hicks ,&nbsp;Johannes Rousk","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When dry soil is rewetted, contrasting microbial responses can be induced, ranging from a more resilient type of response with faster growth recovery to a more sensitive type of response with a slower growth recovery. These microbial responses will also affect soil carbon (C) cycling in the rhizosphere. However, whether the microbially-controlled priming of soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization is differently susceptible to rhizodeposits after rewetting remains elusive. We here compared two soils with microbial communities that were either resilient or sensitive to drying-rewetting (a drought cycle), where root exudation was simulated with semi-continuous additions of <sup>13</sup>C-labelled glucose under stable moisture, or following a drought cycle. Under stable moisture, simulated rhizodeposits increased soil C mineralization by ca. 20% in the soil with drought-sensitive microbes and lower nitrogen (N) availability, triggering a stronger priming effect than in the soil with drought-resilient microbes. This suggested that microbial N-demand explained the priming responses under stable moisture. A cycle of drought strengthened the priming of soil C mineralization in the soil with drought-resilient microbes, leading to 100% increases in soil C mineralization, while it was weakened to undetectable levels in the soil with drought-sensitive microbes. The weakened response to rhizodeposits was linked to high levels of resource per unit viable microbes, likely reducing the microbial N-demand and thus SOM-mining. In contrast, in the soil with drought-resilient microbes, a lesser disruption of the microbial community coincided with a smaller liberation of resources, likely strengthening microbial demands for resources and inducing bacterial mining of SOM for nutrients. Our study suggests that the trait distributions that define microbial drought resilience will determine if rhizodeposits will induce sequestration or release of soil C after a drought cycle, where drought resilient communities will result in soil C loss, while drought sensitive communities will result in soil C accrual.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 109789"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725000823","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When dry soil is rewetted, contrasting microbial responses can be induced, ranging from a more resilient type of response with faster growth recovery to a more sensitive type of response with a slower growth recovery. These microbial responses will also affect soil carbon (C) cycling in the rhizosphere. However, whether the microbially-controlled priming of soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization is differently susceptible to rhizodeposits after rewetting remains elusive. We here compared two soils with microbial communities that were either resilient or sensitive to drying-rewetting (a drought cycle), where root exudation was simulated with semi-continuous additions of 13C-labelled glucose under stable moisture, or following a drought cycle. Under stable moisture, simulated rhizodeposits increased soil C mineralization by ca. 20% in the soil with drought-sensitive microbes and lower nitrogen (N) availability, triggering a stronger priming effect than in the soil with drought-resilient microbes. This suggested that microbial N-demand explained the priming responses under stable moisture. A cycle of drought strengthened the priming of soil C mineralization in the soil with drought-resilient microbes, leading to 100% increases in soil C mineralization, while it was weakened to undetectable levels in the soil with drought-sensitive microbes. The weakened response to rhizodeposits was linked to high levels of resource per unit viable microbes, likely reducing the microbial N-demand and thus SOM-mining. In contrast, in the soil with drought-resilient microbes, a lesser disruption of the microbial community coincided with a smaller liberation of resources, likely strengthening microbial demands for resources and inducing bacterial mining of SOM for nutrients. Our study suggests that the trait distributions that define microbial drought resilience will determine if rhizodeposits will induce sequestration or release of soil C after a drought cycle, where drought resilient communities will result in soil C loss, while drought sensitive communities will result in soil C accrual.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根系分泌物如何促进干旱后土壤有机质的分解?
当干燥的土壤重新湿润时,可以诱导不同的微生物反应,从具有更快生长恢复的更有弹性的反应类型到具有更慢生长恢复的更敏感的反应类型。这些微生物反应也会影响根际土壤碳(C)循环。然而,微生物控制的土壤有机质(SOM)矿化是否对再湿润后的根沉积有不同的敏感性尚不清楚。我们在这里比较了两种土壤的微生物群落,它们对干-再湿(干旱循环)有弹性或敏感,在稳定的湿度下,或在干旱循环后,用半连续添加13c标记的葡萄糖来模拟根系渗出。在稳定水分条件下,模拟根沉积物使具有干旱敏感微生物和低氮有效性的土壤中的土壤C矿化提高了约20%,引发的启动效应比具有抗旱微生物的土壤更强。这表明在稳定水分条件下,微生物对氮的需求解释了启动反应。干旱循环强化了土壤中抗旱微生物对土壤C矿化的启动作用,导致土壤C矿化增加100%,而干旱敏感微生物则将其削弱到无法检测的水平。对根沉积物的反应减弱与单位活菌资源水平高有关,可能减少了微生物对n的需求,从而减少了som的开采。相比之下,在具有抗旱微生物的土壤中,微生物群落的破坏程度越低,资源的解放程度也越低,这可能会加强微生物对资源的需求,并诱导细菌挖掘SOM以获取营养。我们的研究表明,定义微生物抗旱能力的性状分布将决定根系沉积是否会在干旱周期后引起土壤C的封存或释放,其中抗旱群落会导致土壤C流失,而干旱敏感群落会导致土壤C积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Disentangling organic matter inputs and outputs during litter decomposition using C4-plant teabags Impact of dimethyl disulfide fumigation on soil nitrification and community assembly of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria Estimating soil phosphorus mineralization and immobilization: a comparison of isotope pool dilution vs and isotopic exchange kinetics frameworks Benchmarking metabarcoding and metagenomics pipelines in taxonomic profiling for soil microbial eukaryotes Theoretical approach to calculate carbon use efficiency of cellulose turnover in soil systems, exemplified at calorespirometric data from artificial soil under various environmental conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1