Re-examining market structures: Resource-Advantage theory and the market offering ecosystem perspective

D. Arnett, M. Dass, Kshitij Bhoumik
{"title":"Re-examining market structures: Resource-Advantage theory and the market offering ecosystem perspective","authors":"D. Arnett, M. Dass, Kshitij Bhoumik","doi":"10.1080/21639159.2020.1785917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Understanding market structure is central to firms’ success. It helps organizations understand competition and in turn develop strategies to improve performance. The market structure literature is traditionally driven by three schools of thoughts, supply-side competition, demand-side competition, and target market-based competition. However, researchers are developing more intricate models of market structures, which are inspired by the ecosystem concept and are supported by network analysis techniques. In this article, we present new insights regarding market structures based on an ecosystem metaphor approach. In particular, we propose that a market structure can be classified using six ecosystem-based relationships (mutualism, commensalism, neutralism, amensalism, parasitism, and competition), which are based on how the sales of a market offering affects the sales of other offerings in the same ecosystem. Based on these relationships, we examine these relationships in detail and provide proposals for future research.","PeriodicalId":45711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"189 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21639159.2020.1785917","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1785917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding market structure is central to firms’ success. It helps organizations understand competition and in turn develop strategies to improve performance. The market structure literature is traditionally driven by three schools of thoughts, supply-side competition, demand-side competition, and target market-based competition. However, researchers are developing more intricate models of market structures, which are inspired by the ecosystem concept and are supported by network analysis techniques. In this article, we present new insights regarding market structures based on an ecosystem metaphor approach. In particular, we propose that a market structure can be classified using six ecosystem-based relationships (mutualism, commensalism, neutralism, amensalism, parasitism, and competition), which are based on how the sales of a market offering affects the sales of other offerings in the same ecosystem. Based on these relationships, we examine these relationships in detail and provide proposals for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视市场结构:资源优势理论与市场供应生态系统视角
摘要了解市场结构是企业成功的核心。它有助于组织了解竞争,进而制定提高绩效的战略。市场结构文献传统上由三个学派驱动,即供给侧竞争、需求侧竞争和目标市场竞争。然而,研究人员正在开发更复杂的市场结构模型,这些模型受到生态系统概念的启发,并得到网络分析技术的支持。在这篇文章中,我们提出了基于生态系统隐喻方法的关于市场结构的新见解。特别是,我们提出,可以使用六种基于生态系统的关系(互惠关系、共生关系、中性关系、舒适关系、寄生关系和竞争关系)对市场结构进行分类,这六种关系基于市场产品的销售如何影响同一生态系统中其他产品的销售。基于这些关系,我们详细研究了这些关系,并为未来的研究提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Talk to engage: The influence of smartphone voice assistants on consumers’ brand engagement Being moral motivates consumers to work harder and accept challenges How does omnichannel retailing deliver customer value? Insights from science mapping and future agenda Utilizing gain and loss message framing for consumers: A Machiavellian perspective The current state of big data analytics research in marketing: A systematic review using TCCM approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1