Accessibility and availability: A cross-cultural study of shopper responses to online retail stock-outs

T. Gruen, D. Corsten
{"title":"Accessibility and availability: A cross-cultural study of shopper responses to online retail stock-outs","authors":"T. Gruen, D. Corsten","doi":"10.1080/21639159.2021.1924819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Accessibility of products in online retail is an expected part of the shopper experience journey. Frequent products are not accessible due to non-availability. Introduced by Sheth and Sisodia, the 4A’s framework articulates how success in any marketing program depends on four dimensions: Awareness, Acceptability, Affordability, and Accessibility. This article demonstrates how, like dominos fall, marketing investments can fail when the final 4A’s stage, Accessibility, is not adequately addressed in online retailing. Surveying more than 2,000 shoppers across five European and Asian countries that encountered a non-available item while shopping online for one of six fast-moving consumer goods categories, the research study examines shoppers’ switching behavior when Accessibility has been interrupted in the purchasing stage of the customer journey. The overall goal is to better understand how shoppers change their behavior, and it examines a variety of causes that drive switching behavior, whether it be to switch stores, switch brands, or switch intentions when the item they desired is unavailable. Switching behavior was found to vary greatly among the five countries, but less between categories, and switching was greatly affected by the way shoppers encountered the non-available item. The study concludes with recommendations to address Accessibility both in product availability and shoppers’ transaction costs.","PeriodicalId":45711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"415 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21639159.2021.1924819","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2021.1924819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accessibility of products in online retail is an expected part of the shopper experience journey. Frequent products are not accessible due to non-availability. Introduced by Sheth and Sisodia, the 4A’s framework articulates how success in any marketing program depends on four dimensions: Awareness, Acceptability, Affordability, and Accessibility. This article demonstrates how, like dominos fall, marketing investments can fail when the final 4A’s stage, Accessibility, is not adequately addressed in online retailing. Surveying more than 2,000 shoppers across five European and Asian countries that encountered a non-available item while shopping online for one of six fast-moving consumer goods categories, the research study examines shoppers’ switching behavior when Accessibility has been interrupted in the purchasing stage of the customer journey. The overall goal is to better understand how shoppers change their behavior, and it examines a variety of causes that drive switching behavior, whether it be to switch stores, switch brands, or switch intentions when the item they desired is unavailable. Switching behavior was found to vary greatly among the five countries, but less between categories, and switching was greatly affected by the way shoppers encountered the non-available item. The study concludes with recommendations to address Accessibility both in product availability and shoppers’ transaction costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可及性与可用性:网上零售缺货顾客反应的跨文化研究
摘要在线零售中产品的可访问性是购物者体验之旅的一个预期部分。由于不可用,无法访问常用产品。由Sheth和Sisodia介绍,4A的框架阐明了任何营销计划的成功如何取决于四个维度:意识、可接受性、可负担性和可访问性。这篇文章展示了当最后4A阶段的无障碍性在在线零售中没有得到充分解决时,营销投资是如何像多米诺骨牌一样失败的。这项研究调查了五个欧洲和亚洲国家的2000多名购物者,他们在网上购物时遇到了六种快速消费品类别中的一种无法买到的商品,研究了在客户旅程的购买阶段,当无障碍服务中断时,购物者的转换行为。总体目标是更好地了解购物者是如何改变他们的行为的,它研究了驱动转换行为的各种原因,无论是转换商店、转换品牌,还是在他们想要的商品不可用时转换意图。研究发现,五个国家的转换行为差异很大,但不同类别之间的转换行为较小,而且转换在很大程度上受到购物者遇到不可用商品的方式的影响。该研究最后提出了在产品可用性和购物者交易成本方面解决无障碍问题的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Talk to engage: The influence of smartphone voice assistants on consumers’ brand engagement Being moral motivates consumers to work harder and accept challenges How does omnichannel retailing deliver customer value? Insights from science mapping and future agenda Utilizing gain and loss message framing for consumers: A Machiavellian perspective The current state of big data analytics research in marketing: A systematic review using TCCM approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1