A 10-year retrospective cohort study of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy management outcomes in an Australian tertiary centre

Wei-Guo Nicholas Loh, Alan Maurice Adno, Shannon Reid
{"title":"A 10-year retrospective cohort study of non-tubal ectopic pregnancy management outcomes in an Australian tertiary centre","authors":"Wei-Guo Nicholas Loh,&nbsp;Alan Maurice Adno,&nbsp;Shannon Reid","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy (NTEP) is a rare but significant early pregnancy complication which can result in maternal morbidity and mortality. There is however a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the management of NTEP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the success rates of expectant, medical and surgical management in the treatment of NTEP at our tertiary centre.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2020. All NTEP were classified by ectopic sites. Primary management was classified by expectant, medical [systemic methotrexate (Sys-MTX) and/or local ultrasound-guided injection of MTX and/or KCl intra-sac (L-MTX, L-MTX/KCl)] or surgical. Primary management was considered successful if no change in intervention was required. Treatment complications were compared.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four NTEP were identified, which included 14 interstitial pregnancies (IP), 9 caesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) and 1 ovarian pregnancy (OP), which gave NTEP an incidence of 7.12% among all EP (4.15% for IP, 2.67% for CSP and 0.30% for OP). The success of primary surgical management was 100% (7/7), primary medical management was 76.9% (10/13) and primary expectant management was 33.3% (1/3). Primary medical management had a non-statistically significant greater mean time to serum ß-human Chorionic Gonadotrophin &lt;5 IU/L, mean length of hospitalisation, mean number of follow-up visits and hospital re-presentation/readmissions compared to primary surgical management. There was no other difference in complication rates between the treatment management groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Surgery remains the most effective way to manage NTEP. However, medical management can be a safe and effective alternative option in carefully selected cases.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"166-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9644438/pdf/AJUM-25-166.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy (NTEP) is a rare but significant early pregnancy complication which can result in maternal morbidity and mortality. There is however a lack of evidence-based guidelines for the management of NTEP.

Purpose

To evaluate the success rates of expectant, medical and surgical management in the treatment of NTEP at our tertiary centre.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2020. All NTEP were classified by ectopic sites. Primary management was classified by expectant, medical [systemic methotrexate (Sys-MTX) and/or local ultrasound-guided injection of MTX and/or KCl intra-sac (L-MTX, L-MTX/KCl)] or surgical. Primary management was considered successful if no change in intervention was required. Treatment complications were compared.

Results

Twenty-four NTEP were identified, which included 14 interstitial pregnancies (IP), 9 caesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) and 1 ovarian pregnancy (OP), which gave NTEP an incidence of 7.12% among all EP (4.15% for IP, 2.67% for CSP and 0.30% for OP). The success of primary surgical management was 100% (7/7), primary medical management was 76.9% (10/13) and primary expectant management was 33.3% (1/3). Primary medical management had a non-statistically significant greater mean time to serum ß-human Chorionic Gonadotrophin <5 IU/L, mean length of hospitalisation, mean number of follow-up visits and hospital re-presentation/readmissions compared to primary surgical management. There was no other difference in complication rates between the treatment management groups.

Conclusion

Surgery remains the most effective way to manage NTEP. However, medical management can be a safe and effective alternative option in carefully selected cases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚高等教育中心非输卵管性异位妊娠管理结果的10年回顾性队列研究
非输卵管性异位妊娠(NTEP)是一种罕见但重要的妊娠早期并发症,可导致产妇发病率和死亡率。然而,缺乏基于证据的NTEP管理指南。目的评价我院三级专科医院治疗原发性脑出血的预期、内科和外科治疗的成功率。方法2010 ~ 2020年回顾性队列研究。所有NTEP均按异位位点进行分类。初步治疗分为期待治疗、内科治疗[全身甲氨蝶呤(Sys-MTX)和/或超声引导下囊内局部注射MTX和/或KCl (L-MTX, L-MTX/KCl)]或手术治疗。如果不需要改变干预措施,则认为初级管理是成功的。比较治疗并发症。结果共发现24例NTEP,其中间质妊娠(IP) 14例,瘢痕妊娠(CSP) 9例,卵巢妊娠(OP) 1例,NTEP发生率为7.12% (IP为4.15%,CSP为2.67%,OP为0.30%)。手术治疗成功率为100%(7/7),内科治疗成功率为76.9%(10/13),期待治疗成功率为33.3%(1/3)。与初级手术治疗相比,初级医疗治疗的血清ß-人绒毛膜促性腺激素5 IU/L平均时间、平均住院时间、平均随访次数和医院再就诊/再入院时间更长,无统计学意义。治疗组和管理组之间的并发症发生率没有其他差异。结论手术仍是治疗NTEP最有效的方法。然而,在精心挑选的病例中,医疗管理可以是一种安全有效的替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The impact of ultrasound imaging on patient management – Let's practice the evidence EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided Ultrasound‐assisted and landmark‐based nusinersen delivery in spinal muscular atrophy adults: A retrospective analysis Cutaneous ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory activity in tinea capitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1