[当前变异对COVID-19患者的临床影响:变异EG.5的临床特征]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Mikrobiyoloji bulteni Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.5578/mb.20249665
Ferhat Gürkan Aslan, Süleyman Yalçin, Saliha Kazci, Bedia Dinç, Gülay Korukluoğlu
{"title":"[当前变异对COVID-19患者的临床影响:变异EG.5的临床特征]。","authors":"Ferhat Gürkan Aslan, Süleyman Yalçin, Saliha Kazci, Bedia Dinç, Gülay Korukluoğlu","doi":"10.5578/mb.20249665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has mutated at a high rate since the beginning of the pandemic, leading to the formation of different variants. Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron have emerged as concerning variants identified by the World Health Organization (WHO). The Omicron variant and its sublineages became dominant worldwide in 2022. EG.5, a sublineage of Omicron, was associated with increased cases recently. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 variants and the severity of the disease by using the whole genome sequence analysis method in patient samples diagnosed with coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) in our hospital and to contribute to SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in our country, in the period until the end of 2023, after the announcement of the EG.5 variant. The study included 68 patient samples that were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by polymerase chain reaction. Nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples obtained from the patients were analysed by syndromic multiplex viral polymerase chain reaction panel. Whole genome sequence analysis was performed on SARS-CoV-2 positive patient samples with high viral load. Barcoded sequencing library was prepared and extracted DNA was sequenced on the Illumina next generation sequencing platform using COVIDSeq test kits (Illumina, USA). The library was loaded into a NextSeq 500/550 high output reagent cartridge v2 75 cycle, NextSeq 500/550 high output flow cell on the NextSeq 550 instrument (Illumina, USA). The DRAGEN COVID lineage programme available in the core domain was used to analyse the sequence data. The resulting combined fasta files were loaded into Nexclade and Pangolin COVID-19 Lineage Assigner programmes and class assignment, mutation calls and sequence quality checks were performed. Statistical evaluation was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Windows v20.0, Armonk, NY) programme. Sequence results of a total of 68 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 positivity was confirmed in our laboratory and whose samples were suitable for sequence study were analysed with clinical data. While EG.5 variant was detected in 15 (22.1%) of the samples included in the study, different sub-variants other than EG.5 were detected in 53 (77.9%) samples. The first three most frequently detected variants were XBB.1.16, EG.5.1 and FL.1.5.1, respectively. The subtypes of the EG.5 variant were determined as EG.5.1.1, EG.5.1.3, EG.5.1.6 and EG.5.1. Of the patients included in the study, 20 (29.4%) were hospitalised and followed up, 14 of whom had moderate to severe clinical conditions. Four hospitalised patients with comorbidities at an advanced age resulted in exitus. In the statistical evaluation, no significant difference was found between EG.5 and nonEG.5 Omicron variants in terms of age group, clinical symptoms and disease severity. It is recommended to continue genomic surveillance for the timely identification of SARS-CoV-2 and changes in the clinical spectrum and implementation of appropriate countermeasures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18509,"journal":{"name":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","volume":"58 4","pages":"448-460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical Impact of Current Variants in COVID-19 Patients: Clinical Characteristics in Variant EG.5].\",\"authors\":\"Ferhat Gürkan Aslan, Süleyman Yalçin, Saliha Kazci, Bedia Dinç, Gülay Korukluoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.5578/mb.20249665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has mutated at a high rate since the beginning of the pandemic, leading to the formation of different variants. Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron have emerged as concerning variants identified by the World Health Organization (WHO). The Omicron variant and its sublineages became dominant worldwide in 2022. EG.5, a sublineage of Omicron, was associated with increased cases recently. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 variants and the severity of the disease by using the whole genome sequence analysis method in patient samples diagnosed with coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) in our hospital and to contribute to SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in our country, in the period until the end of 2023, after the announcement of the EG.5 variant. The study included 68 patient samples that were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by polymerase chain reaction. Nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples obtained from the patients were analysed by syndromic multiplex viral polymerase chain reaction panel. Whole genome sequence analysis was performed on SARS-CoV-2 positive patient samples with high viral load. Barcoded sequencing library was prepared and extracted DNA was sequenced on the Illumina next generation sequencing platform using COVIDSeq test kits (Illumina, USA). The library was loaded into a NextSeq 500/550 high output reagent cartridge v2 75 cycle, NextSeq 500/550 high output flow cell on the NextSeq 550 instrument (Illumina, USA). The DRAGEN COVID lineage programme available in the core domain was used to analyse the sequence data. The resulting combined fasta files were loaded into Nexclade and Pangolin COVID-19 Lineage Assigner programmes and class assignment, mutation calls and sequence quality checks were performed. Statistical evaluation was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Windows v20.0, Armonk, NY) programme. Sequence results of a total of 68 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 positivity was confirmed in our laboratory and whose samples were suitable for sequence study were analysed with clinical data. While EG.5 variant was detected in 15 (22.1%) of the samples included in the study, different sub-variants other than EG.5 were detected in 53 (77.9%) samples. The first three most frequently detected variants were XBB.1.16, EG.5.1 and FL.1.5.1, respectively. The subtypes of the EG.5 variant were determined as EG.5.1.1, EG.5.1.3, EG.5.1.6 and EG.5.1. Of the patients included in the study, 20 (29.4%) were hospitalised and followed up, 14 of whom had moderate to severe clinical conditions. Four hospitalised patients with comorbidities at an advanced age resulted in exitus. In the statistical evaluation, no significant difference was found between EG.5 and nonEG.5 Omicron variants in terms of age group, clinical symptoms and disease severity. It is recommended to continue genomic surveillance for the timely identification of SARS-CoV-2 and changes in the clinical spectrum and implementation of appropriate countermeasures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"448-460\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.20249665\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.20249665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自大流行开始以来,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)病毒以高速率突变,导致不同变体的形成。Alpha、Beta、Gamma、Delta和Omicron已成为世界卫生组织(世卫组织)确定的变异。欧米克隆变体及其子谱系在2022年成为全球的主导基因。eg5是欧米克隆的一个亚谱系,最近与病例增加有关。在本研究中,我们旨在通过对我院诊断为2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的患者样本的全基因组序列分析方法,探讨SARS-CoV-2变异与疾病严重程度的关系,并为我国在EG.5变异公布后至2023年底期间的SARS-CoV-2监测做出贡献。该研究包括68例患者样本,这些样本通过聚合酶链反应被发现为SARS-CoV-2阳性。采用综合征多重病毒聚合酶链反应小组对患者鼻咽/口咽拭子样本进行分析。对高病毒载量的SARS-CoV-2阳性患者样本进行全基因组序列分析。制备条形码测序文库,提取的DNA在Illumina下一代测序平台上使用covid - seq检测试剂盒(Illumina, USA)进行测序。将文库装入NextSeq 500/550高输出试剂盒v2 75循环中,NextSeq 500/550高输出流式电池安装在NextSeq 550仪器(Illumina, USA)上。使用核心结构域可用的DRAGEN COVID谱系程序分析序列数据。将得到的联合fasta文件加载到Nexclade和穿山甲COVID-19谱系分配程序中,并进行类分配、突变调用和序列质量检查。使用Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Windows v20.0, Armonk, NY)程序进行统计评估。对我院实验室确诊的68例SARS-CoV-2阳性患者的序列结果与临床资料进行分析。在纳入研究的15份样本(22.1%)中检测到EG.5变异,在53份样本(77.9%)中检测到EG.5以外的不同亚变异。前三个最常检测到的变异分别是XBB.1.16, EG.5.1和FL.1.5.1。确定EG.5变异亚型为EG.5.1.1、EG.5.1.3、EG.5.1.6和EG.5.1。在纳入研究的患者中,20例(29.4%)住院并随访,其中14例有中度至重度临床症状。4例高龄合并合并症住院患者退出。在统计评价中,EG.5与非EG.5无显著差异在年龄组、临床症状和疾病严重程度方面的组粒变异。建议继续开展基因组监测,及时识别SARS-CoV-2和临床谱的变化,并实施适当的对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Clinical Impact of Current Variants in COVID-19 Patients: Clinical Characteristics in Variant EG.5].

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has mutated at a high rate since the beginning of the pandemic, leading to the formation of different variants. Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron have emerged as concerning variants identified by the World Health Organization (WHO). The Omicron variant and its sublineages became dominant worldwide in 2022. EG.5, a sublineage of Omicron, was associated with increased cases recently. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 variants and the severity of the disease by using the whole genome sequence analysis method in patient samples diagnosed with coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) in our hospital and to contribute to SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in our country, in the period until the end of 2023, after the announcement of the EG.5 variant. The study included 68 patient samples that were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by polymerase chain reaction. Nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples obtained from the patients were analysed by syndromic multiplex viral polymerase chain reaction panel. Whole genome sequence analysis was performed on SARS-CoV-2 positive patient samples with high viral load. Barcoded sequencing library was prepared and extracted DNA was sequenced on the Illumina next generation sequencing platform using COVIDSeq test kits (Illumina, USA). The library was loaded into a NextSeq 500/550 high output reagent cartridge v2 75 cycle, NextSeq 500/550 high output flow cell on the NextSeq 550 instrument (Illumina, USA). The DRAGEN COVID lineage programme available in the core domain was used to analyse the sequence data. The resulting combined fasta files were loaded into Nexclade and Pangolin COVID-19 Lineage Assigner programmes and class assignment, mutation calls and sequence quality checks were performed. Statistical evaluation was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Windows v20.0, Armonk, NY) programme. Sequence results of a total of 68 patients whose SARS-CoV-2 positivity was confirmed in our laboratory and whose samples were suitable for sequence study were analysed with clinical data. While EG.5 variant was detected in 15 (22.1%) of the samples included in the study, different sub-variants other than EG.5 were detected in 53 (77.9%) samples. The first three most frequently detected variants were XBB.1.16, EG.5.1 and FL.1.5.1, respectively. The subtypes of the EG.5 variant were determined as EG.5.1.1, EG.5.1.3, EG.5.1.6 and EG.5.1. Of the patients included in the study, 20 (29.4%) were hospitalised and followed up, 14 of whom had moderate to severe clinical conditions. Four hospitalised patients with comorbidities at an advanced age resulted in exitus. In the statistical evaluation, no significant difference was found between EG.5 and nonEG.5 Omicron variants in terms of age group, clinical symptoms and disease severity. It is recommended to continue genomic surveillance for the timely identification of SARS-CoV-2 and changes in the clinical spectrum and implementation of appropriate countermeasures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Microbiology is the scientific official publication of Ankara Microbiology Society. It is published quarterly in January, April, July and October. The aim of Bulletin of Microbiology is to publish high quality scientific research articles on the subjects of medical and clinical microbiology. In addition, review articles, short communications and reports, case reports, editorials, letters to editor and other training-oriented scientific materials are also accepted. Publishing language is Turkish with a comprehensive English abstract. The editorial policy of the journal is based on independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review. Specialists of medical and/or clinical microbiology, infectious disease and public health, and clinicians and researchers who are training and interesting with those subjects, are the target groups of Bulletin of Microbiology.
期刊最新文献
[An Endemic Disease in the Black Sea Region: Leptospirosis]. [Can Coronavirus HCoV-229E be Used as a Model Virus Instead of SARS-CoV-2 in Antiviral Efficacy Studies?] [Effects of Efflux Pump Inhibitors and Antileishmanial Drug Combinations on Leishmania tropica and Leishmania infantum Isolates]. [Effects of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing Applied to Cancer Patients on MRSA and VRE Colonization: A Cross-Over Design Study]. [Investigation of Molecular Differences in Plasmodium spp. Isolates Obtained from Malaria Patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1