种族偏见和设计因素影响在线旅游调查的回复率

B. Pan, Wayne W. Smith, S. W. Litvin, Yulan Yuan, A. Woodside
{"title":"种族偏见和设计因素影响在线旅游调查的回复率","authors":"B. Pan, Wayne W. Smith, S. W. Litvin, Yulan Yuan, A. Woodside","doi":"10.1080/21639159.2020.1808827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Low response rates are pointed as a critical problem in online travel surveys. Tourism researchers need to strive to find ways to increase response rates in order to improve the surveys’ coverage as well as representativeness. Through an experiment, this paper specifically examines the design factors that provide social clues in online survey, and the timing of the solicitation. The results indicated that solicitations sent with a researcher’s Western name induced dramatically more responses (>60%) than did the same solicitation sent with a Chinese name; the attachment of an authoritative title for the Chinese researcher did not mitigate the problem; surveys sent out on Saturday with a reminder on Monday generated the highest response rate; among the variations tested, wording of the solicitation email’s subject line had insignificant impact on response rates. Details of the experiment and an explanation of results based upon underlying social factors are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","volume":"32 1","pages":"129 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808827","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnic bias and design factors impact response rates of online travel surveys\",\"authors\":\"B. Pan, Wayne W. Smith, S. W. Litvin, Yulan Yuan, A. Woodside\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21639159.2020.1808827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Low response rates are pointed as a critical problem in online travel surveys. Tourism researchers need to strive to find ways to increase response rates in order to improve the surveys’ coverage as well as representativeness. Through an experiment, this paper specifically examines the design factors that provide social clues in online survey, and the timing of the solicitation. The results indicated that solicitations sent with a researcher’s Western name induced dramatically more responses (>60%) than did the same solicitation sent with a Chinese name; the attachment of an authoritative title for the Chinese researcher did not mitigate the problem; surveys sent out on Saturday with a reminder on Monday generated the highest response rate; among the variations tested, wording of the solicitation email’s subject line had insignificant impact on response rates. Details of the experiment and an explanation of results based upon underlying social factors are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808827\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在线旅游调查指出,低回复率是一个关键问题。旅游研究人员需要努力寻找提高回复率的方法,以提高调查的覆盖率和代表性。通过实验,本文具体考察了在线调查中提供社会线索的设计因素,以及征集的时机。研究结果表明,以研究人员的西方名字发出的征集比以中国名字发出的相同征集引起的回应要多得多(>60%);中国研究人员的权威头衔并没有缓解问题;周六发布的带有周一提醒的调查产生了最高的回复率;在测试的变体中,征求电子邮件主题行的措辞对回复率的影响微乎其微。讨论了实验的细节以及基于潜在社会因素对结果的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethnic bias and design factors impact response rates of online travel surveys
ABSTRACT Low response rates are pointed as a critical problem in online travel surveys. Tourism researchers need to strive to find ways to increase response rates in order to improve the surveys’ coverage as well as representativeness. Through an experiment, this paper specifically examines the design factors that provide social clues in online survey, and the timing of the solicitation. The results indicated that solicitations sent with a researcher’s Western name induced dramatically more responses (>60%) than did the same solicitation sent with a Chinese name; the attachment of an authoritative title for the Chinese researcher did not mitigate the problem; surveys sent out on Saturday with a reminder on Monday generated the highest response rate; among the variations tested, wording of the solicitation email’s subject line had insignificant impact on response rates. Details of the experiment and an explanation of results based upon underlying social factors are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Talk to engage: The influence of smartphone voice assistants on consumers’ brand engagement Being moral motivates consumers to work harder and accept challenges How does omnichannel retailing deliver customer value? Insights from science mapping and future agenda Utilizing gain and loss message framing for consumers: A Machiavellian perspective The current state of big data analytics research in marketing: A systematic review using TCCM approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1