幼儿课程体验

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Early Years Education Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/09669760.2022.2149092
J. Murray
{"title":"幼儿课程体验","authors":"J. Murray","doi":"10.1080/09669760.2022.2149092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previously, I have written about early childhood pedagogies (Murray 2018). In introducing this exciting extended issue of International Journal of Early Years Education, I focus on another key feature of early education, regarded as ‘a foundational fulcrum on which quality pedagogy rests’ (Kagan, Kauerz, and Junus 2022): curriculum. The wide range of manuscripts focused on curriculum that we receive at International Journal of Early Years Education are testament to the prominence of curriculum in the work of those who research in our field; alongside this focus in recent years, we have seen an exponential rise in centralised curriculum frameworks. In this paper, however, I argue that the key actors in any early childhood curriculum that secures learning most likely to be meaningful to young children are those who are directly engaged in its implementation: the learners and their teachers. In building this argument, I consider some definitions and components of curriculum, the potential of curriculum for reproducing or reducing inequalities, its role in an uncertain and dynamic global landscape, merits of an holistic approach, children’s agency in curriculum, and the teacher’s role in reifying a curriculum with value and relevance for young learners whose lives as adults we cannot yet imagine (Wiliam 2011). When the term ‘curriculum’ was originally linked to education in the C16th Europe, it denoted an ordered systematic framework for what is taught and learned (Hamilton 1989). Four hundred years later, curriculum was still being defined as ‘All the learning which is planned and guided’ (Kerr 1968, 16). However, it is important to note that these descriptions refer to the explicit curriculum, as distinct from the ‘hidden curriculum’, which is instrumental in the implicit reproduction of values and behaviours in schools (Jackson 1968). In C21st early childhood provision, the explicit curriculum may be described at its most prescriptive as the ‘organised framework that delineates the content children are to learn, the processes through which children achieve the identified curricular goals, what teachers do to help children achieve these goals, and the context in which teaching and learning occur’ (NAEYC&NAECS/SDE 2009). YetUNESCOproposes amore holistic view of curriculum that encompasses formal and informal curricula: the ‘totality of what children learn while at school – including what they learn through classroom activities; in interdisciplinary tasks; across the school, for example, in the playground, at lunch timewhen eating (civic responsibilities, etc.)’ (Stabback 2016: 9).Moreover, the early childhood curriculum has been defined as ‘everything children do, see, hear or feel in their setting, both planned and unplanned’ (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and Department for Education and Employment (QCA and DfEE) 2000:1).","PeriodicalId":46866,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Early Years Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young children's curriculum experiences\",\"authors\":\"J. Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09669760.2022.2149092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Previously, I have written about early childhood pedagogies (Murray 2018). In introducing this exciting extended issue of International Journal of Early Years Education, I focus on another key feature of early education, regarded as ‘a foundational fulcrum on which quality pedagogy rests’ (Kagan, Kauerz, and Junus 2022): curriculum. The wide range of manuscripts focused on curriculum that we receive at International Journal of Early Years Education are testament to the prominence of curriculum in the work of those who research in our field; alongside this focus in recent years, we have seen an exponential rise in centralised curriculum frameworks. In this paper, however, I argue that the key actors in any early childhood curriculum that secures learning most likely to be meaningful to young children are those who are directly engaged in its implementation: the learners and their teachers. In building this argument, I consider some definitions and components of curriculum, the potential of curriculum for reproducing or reducing inequalities, its role in an uncertain and dynamic global landscape, merits of an holistic approach, children’s agency in curriculum, and the teacher’s role in reifying a curriculum with value and relevance for young learners whose lives as adults we cannot yet imagine (Wiliam 2011). When the term ‘curriculum’ was originally linked to education in the C16th Europe, it denoted an ordered systematic framework for what is taught and learned (Hamilton 1989). Four hundred years later, curriculum was still being defined as ‘All the learning which is planned and guided’ (Kerr 1968, 16). However, it is important to note that these descriptions refer to the explicit curriculum, as distinct from the ‘hidden curriculum’, which is instrumental in the implicit reproduction of values and behaviours in schools (Jackson 1968). In C21st early childhood provision, the explicit curriculum may be described at its most prescriptive as the ‘organised framework that delineates the content children are to learn, the processes through which children achieve the identified curricular goals, what teachers do to help children achieve these goals, and the context in which teaching and learning occur’ (NAEYC&NAECS/SDE 2009). YetUNESCOproposes amore holistic view of curriculum that encompasses formal and informal curricula: the ‘totality of what children learn while at school – including what they learn through classroom activities; in interdisciplinary tasks; across the school, for example, in the playground, at lunch timewhen eating (civic responsibilities, etc.)’ (Stabback 2016: 9).Moreover, the early childhood curriculum has been defined as ‘everything children do, see, hear or feel in their setting, both planned and unplanned’ (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and Department for Education and Employment (QCA and DfEE) 2000:1).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Early Years Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Early Years Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2022.2149092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Early Years Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2022.2149092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

之前,我写过关于幼儿教育学的文章(Murray 2018)。在介绍这期激动人心的《国际早期教育杂志》时,我重点介绍了早期教育的另一个关键特征,它被视为“优质教育学的基础支点”(Kagan、Kauerz和Junus 2022):课程。我们在《国际早期教育杂志》上收到的大量专注于课程的手稿证明了课程在我们领域研究人员的工作中的突出地位;近年来,在关注这一点的同时,我们看到集中课程框架呈指数级增长。然而,在本文中,我认为,在任何确保学习对幼儿最有意义的幼儿课程中,关键参与者都是直接参与实施的人:学习者和他们的老师。在构建这一论点时,我考虑了课程的一些定义和组成部分,课程在再现或减少不平等方面的潜力,它在不确定和充满活力的全球环境中的作用,整体方法的优点,儿童在课程中的能动性,以及教师在具体化课程中的作用,这些课程对我们还无法想象成年后生活的年轻学习者具有价值和相关性(Wiliam,2011)。当“课程”一词最初与C16欧洲的教育联系在一起时,它表示所教所学的有序系统框架(Hamilton 1989)。四百年后,课程仍然被定义为“所有有计划和指导的学习”(Kerr 1968,16)。然而,值得注意的是,这些描述指的是显性课程,与“隐性课程”不同,后者有助于学校价值观和行为的隐性再现(Jackson 1968)。在C21幼儿课程中,明确的课程可以被描述为“有组织的框架,它描述了儿童要学习的内容、儿童实现确定的课程目标的过程、教师为帮助儿童实现这些目标所做的事情,以及教学和学习的背景”(NAEYC&NAECS/SDE 2009)。Yetunesco提出了一种更全面的课程观,包括正式和非正式课程:“孩子在学校学习的全部内容——包括他们通过课堂活动学习的内容;跨学科任务;整个学校,例如,在操场上,午餐时间吃饭(公民责任等)”(Stabback 2016:9)。此外,幼儿课程被定义为“孩子们在自己的环境中所做的一切、看到的、听到的或感受的一切,无论是有计划的还是无计划的”(资格和课程管理局以及教育和就业部(QCA和DfEE)2000:1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Young children's curriculum experiences
Previously, I have written about early childhood pedagogies (Murray 2018). In introducing this exciting extended issue of International Journal of Early Years Education, I focus on another key feature of early education, regarded as ‘a foundational fulcrum on which quality pedagogy rests’ (Kagan, Kauerz, and Junus 2022): curriculum. The wide range of manuscripts focused on curriculum that we receive at International Journal of Early Years Education are testament to the prominence of curriculum in the work of those who research in our field; alongside this focus in recent years, we have seen an exponential rise in centralised curriculum frameworks. In this paper, however, I argue that the key actors in any early childhood curriculum that secures learning most likely to be meaningful to young children are those who are directly engaged in its implementation: the learners and their teachers. In building this argument, I consider some definitions and components of curriculum, the potential of curriculum for reproducing or reducing inequalities, its role in an uncertain and dynamic global landscape, merits of an holistic approach, children’s agency in curriculum, and the teacher’s role in reifying a curriculum with value and relevance for young learners whose lives as adults we cannot yet imagine (Wiliam 2011). When the term ‘curriculum’ was originally linked to education in the C16th Europe, it denoted an ordered systematic framework for what is taught and learned (Hamilton 1989). Four hundred years later, curriculum was still being defined as ‘All the learning which is planned and guided’ (Kerr 1968, 16). However, it is important to note that these descriptions refer to the explicit curriculum, as distinct from the ‘hidden curriculum’, which is instrumental in the implicit reproduction of values and behaviours in schools (Jackson 1968). In C21st early childhood provision, the explicit curriculum may be described at its most prescriptive as the ‘organised framework that delineates the content children are to learn, the processes through which children achieve the identified curricular goals, what teachers do to help children achieve these goals, and the context in which teaching and learning occur’ (NAEYC&NAECS/SDE 2009). YetUNESCOproposes amore holistic view of curriculum that encompasses formal and informal curricula: the ‘totality of what children learn while at school – including what they learn through classroom activities; in interdisciplinary tasks; across the school, for example, in the playground, at lunch timewhen eating (civic responsibilities, etc.)’ (Stabback 2016: 9).Moreover, the early childhood curriculum has been defined as ‘everything children do, see, hear or feel in their setting, both planned and unplanned’ (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority and Department for Education and Employment (QCA and DfEE) 2000:1).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Early Years Education
International Journal of Early Years Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Re-engaging dialogue about the DAP debate: Implications for teacher education Quality of educator-toddler conversations varies across activity settings in centre-based ECEC The new (ab)normal: the participation of children attending preschool and elementary school during confinement Preservice teachers’ perspectives of play in early childhood education Parent–child math talk and early math interest: comparing the effects of written versus hands-on materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1