对“有机锗对公众和环境的影响综述”评论的回应

IF 11.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1080/10643389.2022.2138547
Jiang Zheng, Yaocheng Deng
{"title":"对“有机锗对公众和环境的影响综述”评论的回应","authors":"Jiang Zheng, Yaocheng Deng","doi":"10.1080/10643389.2022.2138547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main criticism of Filella (2022) against us is that we confuse the types of organic germanium and the lack of a clear definition and discussion of organic germanium. Earlier in the discussion about the application of organic germanium, there were concerns about the types of organic germanium (Goodman, 1988; Kaplan et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2005). These reviews generally agree that the classification of organic germanium and their compounds is complex and currently they are all just collectively referred to as organic germanium (Yamaguchi et al., 2015). At this circumstance, it is very difficult to present clear description about “organic germanium,” and Filella (2022) also did not present clear information about what the term “organic germanium” means in the comments. However, to clarify the definition of organic germanium, we divide organic germanium into three main categories: synthetic organic germanium; natural organic germanium; and bioorganic germanium (Narokha et al., 2022). Synthetic organic germanium is hydroxyethyl germanium sesquioxides, i.e. Ge-132, spiro germanium, furan germanium derivatives, and other types of antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer organic germanium, which are compounds with a wide range of pharmacological effects, but are easy to cause calcium deficiency when taken in excess; natural organic germanium is extracted from natural plants or consumed directly without any toxic side effects on the human body; bio-organic germanium is germanium compounds implanted in living organisms such as yeast, bacteria macrofungi, and vegetables. Possible mechanisms of tumor suppressing activity of organogermanium compounds include several aspects such as enhancement of body immunity, scavenging of free radicals, and antimutagenesis. In many biologically active molecules of organogermanium compounds, the germanium atoms are usually coordinated to strongly electronegative atoms such as oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen, which due to their electron absorption cause the electron cloud around the germanium atom to deviate from the nucleus and form a positively charged center. Filella (2022) stated that we mix all types of possible “organic germanium.” In this part, we proposed many content about We Ge-132 and spirogermanium, because these two types of organic germanium are the most studied types of organic germanium and also the most promising organic germanium for applications, while other organic germanium are almost uncommon with no precise conclusions (Pr onai & Arimori, 1992). Therefore, Filella (2022)’s concern is superfluous.","PeriodicalId":10823,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"53 1","pages":"1478 - 1488"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to comment on “A review of public and environmental consequences of organic germanium”\",\"authors\":\"Jiang Zheng, Yaocheng Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10643389.2022.2138547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main criticism of Filella (2022) against us is that we confuse the types of organic germanium and the lack of a clear definition and discussion of organic germanium. Earlier in the discussion about the application of organic germanium, there were concerns about the types of organic germanium (Goodman, 1988; Kaplan et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2005). These reviews generally agree that the classification of organic germanium and their compounds is complex and currently they are all just collectively referred to as organic germanium (Yamaguchi et al., 2015). At this circumstance, it is very difficult to present clear description about “organic germanium,” and Filella (2022) also did not present clear information about what the term “organic germanium” means in the comments. However, to clarify the definition of organic germanium, we divide organic germanium into three main categories: synthetic organic germanium; natural organic germanium; and bioorganic germanium (Narokha et al., 2022). Synthetic organic germanium is hydroxyethyl germanium sesquioxides, i.e. Ge-132, spiro germanium, furan germanium derivatives, and other types of antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer organic germanium, which are compounds with a wide range of pharmacological effects, but are easy to cause calcium deficiency when taken in excess; natural organic germanium is extracted from natural plants or consumed directly without any toxic side effects on the human body; bio-organic germanium is germanium compounds implanted in living organisms such as yeast, bacteria macrofungi, and vegetables. Possible mechanisms of tumor suppressing activity of organogermanium compounds include several aspects such as enhancement of body immunity, scavenging of free radicals, and antimutagenesis. In many biologically active molecules of organogermanium compounds, the germanium atoms are usually coordinated to strongly electronegative atoms such as oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen, which due to their electron absorption cause the electron cloud around the germanium atom to deviate from the nucleus and form a positively charged center. Filella (2022) stated that we mix all types of possible “organic germanium.” In this part, we proposed many content about We Ge-132 and spirogermanium, because these two types of organic germanium are the most studied types of organic germanium and also the most promising organic germanium for applications, while other organic germanium are almost uncommon with no precise conclusions (Pr onai & Arimori, 1992). Therefore, Filella (2022)’s concern is superfluous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"1478 - 1488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2138547\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2138547","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Filella(2022)对我们的主要批评是,我们混淆了有机锗的类型,缺乏对有机锗的明确定义和讨论。在关于有机锗应用的早期讨论中,人们对有机锗的类型表示担忧(Goodman,1988;Kaplan等人,2004年;Yu等人,2005年)。这些综述普遍认为,有机锗及其化合物的分类很复杂,目前它们都只是统称为有机锗(Yamaguchi等人,2015)。在这种情况下,很难对“有机锗”进行明确的描述,Filella(2022)也没有在评论中提供关于“有机锗“一词的含义的明确信息。然而,为了澄清有机锗的定义,我们将有机锗分为三大类:合成有机锗;天然有机锗;和生物有机锗(Narokha等人,2022)。合成有机锗是羟乙基锗倍半氧化物,即Ge-132、螺锗、呋喃锗衍生物,以及其他类型的抗病毒、抗炎和抗癌有机锗,这些化合物具有广泛的药理作用,但过量服用容易导致缺钙;天然有机锗从天然植物中提取或直接食用,对人体没有任何毒副作用;生物有机锗是植入酵母、大型细菌真菌和蔬菜等生物体中的锗化合物。有机锗化合物抑制肿瘤活性的可能机制包括增强机体免疫力、清除自由基和抗突变等几个方面。在有机锗化合物的许多生物活性分子中,锗原子通常与氧、硫和氮等强电负性原子配位,这些原子由于其电子吸收而导致锗原子周围的电子云偏离原子核并形成带正电的中心。Filella(2022)指出,我们混合了所有类型的可能的“有机锗”。在这一部分中,我们提出了许多关于we-Ge-132和螺锗的内容,因为这两种类型的有机锗是研究最多的有机锗类型,也是最有应用前景的有机锗,而其他有机锗几乎不常见,没有确切的结论(Pr-onai&Arimori,1992)。因此,Filella(2022)的担忧是多余的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response to comment on “A review of public and environmental consequences of organic germanium”
The main criticism of Filella (2022) against us is that we confuse the types of organic germanium and the lack of a clear definition and discussion of organic germanium. Earlier in the discussion about the application of organic germanium, there were concerns about the types of organic germanium (Goodman, 1988; Kaplan et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2005). These reviews generally agree that the classification of organic germanium and their compounds is complex and currently they are all just collectively referred to as organic germanium (Yamaguchi et al., 2015). At this circumstance, it is very difficult to present clear description about “organic germanium,” and Filella (2022) also did not present clear information about what the term “organic germanium” means in the comments. However, to clarify the definition of organic germanium, we divide organic germanium into three main categories: synthetic organic germanium; natural organic germanium; and bioorganic germanium (Narokha et al., 2022). Synthetic organic germanium is hydroxyethyl germanium sesquioxides, i.e. Ge-132, spiro germanium, furan germanium derivatives, and other types of antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer organic germanium, which are compounds with a wide range of pharmacological effects, but are easy to cause calcium deficiency when taken in excess; natural organic germanium is extracted from natural plants or consumed directly without any toxic side effects on the human body; bio-organic germanium is germanium compounds implanted in living organisms such as yeast, bacteria macrofungi, and vegetables. Possible mechanisms of tumor suppressing activity of organogermanium compounds include several aspects such as enhancement of body immunity, scavenging of free radicals, and antimutagenesis. In many biologically active molecules of organogermanium compounds, the germanium atoms are usually coordinated to strongly electronegative atoms such as oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen, which due to their electron absorption cause the electron cloud around the germanium atom to deviate from the nucleus and form a positively charged center. Filella (2022) stated that we mix all types of possible “organic germanium.” In this part, we proposed many content about We Ge-132 and spirogermanium, because these two types of organic germanium are the most studied types of organic germanium and also the most promising organic germanium for applications, while other organic germanium are almost uncommon with no precise conclusions (Pr onai & Arimori, 1992). Therefore, Filella (2022)’s concern is superfluous.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
1.60%
发文量
64
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Two of the most pressing global challenges of our era involve understanding and addressing the multitude of environmental problems we face. In order to tackle them effectively, it is essential to devise logical strategies and methods for their control. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology serves as a valuable international platform for the comprehensive assessment of current knowledge across a wide range of environmental science topics. Environmental science is a field that encompasses the intricate and fluid interactions between various scientific disciplines. These include earth and agricultural sciences, chemistry, biology, medicine, and engineering. Furthermore, new disciplines such as environmental toxicology and risk assessment have emerged in response to the increasing complexity of environmental challenges. The purpose of Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology is to provide a space for critical analysis and evaluation of existing knowledge in environmental science. By doing so, it encourages the advancement of our understanding and the development of effective solutions. This journal plays a crucial role in fostering international cooperation and collaboration in addressing the pressing environmental issues of our time.
期刊最新文献
Bisphenol A removal with nitrification and denitrification: Occurrence, mechanism, and microbial mutualism Carbon dots derived from non-biomass waste for a sensing application Comparison of fish and mammalian adipogenesis in vitro: Implications for regulating endocrine disruptors Anaerobic electrochemical membrane bioreactors: A panoramic tool for wastewater treatment and resource recovery Reactive oxidative species generation in pyrite abiotic-oxidation process: Origins, influencing factors, applications for environmental remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1