苏联美术“解冻”时期英语艺术话语中跨文化关系的语言表征

Q3 Arts and Humanities Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.20916/1812-3228-2021-4-67-77
T. Petukhova, N. Sokolova, E. Khomyakova
{"title":"苏联美术“解冻”时期英语艺术话语中跨文化关系的语言表征","authors":"T. Petukhova, N. Sokolova, E. Khomyakova","doi":"10.20916/1812-3228-2021-4-67-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with language representation of the Soviet Union and Western countries intercultural relations in fine arts, reflected in modern Anglophone art discourse. The investigation focuses on the peculiarities used to convey in art critical discourse socio-political concepts, representing cognitive contexts, specific patterns of socio-cultural knowledge, as well as linguistic representation of “Self vs Other” opposition, embedded in cultural interaction in art. A comprehensive lexical, semantic, contextual, linguistic, and cognitive analysis of international art criticism made it possible to reveal that the Cold War and cultural integration are the two overarching cognitive contexts that shape the comprehension and evaluative interpretation of intercultural relations between the Soviet Union and Western countries of the 1950s-1960s. These cognitive contexts underlie the choice of language means used by an art expert to characterize intercultural relations in fine arts. The analysis demonstrates that in Anglophone art criticism these contexts provide an eventive framework. The binary “Self vs Other” opposition can be conveyed in an art history text at different levels, showing its dynamics and in some cases involving a stepwise “Other” to “Self” transformation.","PeriodicalId":53482,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS IN ANGLOPHONE ART DISCOURSE ON SOVIET FINE ARTS OF THE “THAW” PERIOD\",\"authors\":\"T. Petukhova, N. Sokolova, E. Khomyakova\",\"doi\":\"10.20916/1812-3228-2021-4-67-77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with language representation of the Soviet Union and Western countries intercultural relations in fine arts, reflected in modern Anglophone art discourse. The investigation focuses on the peculiarities used to convey in art critical discourse socio-political concepts, representing cognitive contexts, specific patterns of socio-cultural knowledge, as well as linguistic representation of “Self vs Other” opposition, embedded in cultural interaction in art. A comprehensive lexical, semantic, contextual, linguistic, and cognitive analysis of international art criticism made it possible to reveal that the Cold War and cultural integration are the two overarching cognitive contexts that shape the comprehension and evaluative interpretation of intercultural relations between the Soviet Union and Western countries of the 1950s-1960s. These cognitive contexts underlie the choice of language means used by an art expert to characterize intercultural relations in fine arts. The analysis demonstrates that in Anglophone art criticism these contexts provide an eventive framework. The binary “Self vs Other” opposition can be conveyed in an art history text at different levels, showing its dynamics and in some cases involving a stepwise “Other” to “Self” transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2021-4-67-77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2021-4-67-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了苏联与西方国家美术跨文化关系的语言表征在现代英语艺术话语中的体现。调查的重点是在艺术批评话语中用于传达社会政治概念的特点,代表认知背景,社会文化知识的特定模式,以及嵌入艺术文化互动中的“自我与他者”对立的语言表征。对国际艺术批评进行全面的词汇、语义、语境、语言和认知分析,可以揭示冷战和文化整合是两个首要的认知语境,它们塑造了对20世纪50年代至60年代苏联与西方国家之间跨文化关系的理解和评价解释。这些认知背景是艺术专家用来描述美术中跨文化关系的语言手段选择的基础。分析表明,在以英语为母语的艺术批评中,这些语境提供了一个事件框架。二元“自我与他者”的对立可以在艺术史文本中以不同的层次传达,显示其动态,在某些情况下涉及逐步从“他者”到“自我”的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS IN ANGLOPHONE ART DISCOURSE ON SOVIET FINE ARTS OF THE “THAW” PERIOD
The article deals with language representation of the Soviet Union and Western countries intercultural relations in fine arts, reflected in modern Anglophone art discourse. The investigation focuses on the peculiarities used to convey in art critical discourse socio-political concepts, representing cognitive contexts, specific patterns of socio-cultural knowledge, as well as linguistic representation of “Self vs Other” opposition, embedded in cultural interaction in art. A comprehensive lexical, semantic, contextual, linguistic, and cognitive analysis of international art criticism made it possible to reveal that the Cold War and cultural integration are the two overarching cognitive contexts that shape the comprehension and evaluative interpretation of intercultural relations between the Soviet Union and Western countries of the 1950s-1960s. These cognitive contexts underlie the choice of language means used by an art expert to characterize intercultural relations in fine arts. The analysis demonstrates that in Anglophone art criticism these contexts provide an eventive framework. The binary “Self vs Other” opposition can be conveyed in an art history text at different levels, showing its dynamics and in some cases involving a stepwise “Other” to “Self” transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues of Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki) is published under the auspices of the Russian Cognitive Linguists Association. It is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for linguistic research on topics which investigate the interaction between language and human cognition. The contributions focus on topics such as cognitive discourse analysis, phenomenology-based cognitive linguistic research, cognitive sociolinguistics, and cover such matters as mental space theory, blending theory, political discourse, cognitive stylistics, cognitive poetics, natural language categorization, conceptualization theory, lexical network theory, cognitive modeling. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics promotes the constructive interaction between linguistics and such neighbouring disciplines as sociology, cultural studies, psychology, neurolinguistics, communication studies, translation theory and educational linguistics.
期刊最新文献
DOMINANT PRINCIPLE IN LANGUAGE CONSCIOUSNESS OF A DEVIANT LANGUAGE PERSONALITY TEXT COMPLEXITY AS INTERDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM EXPRESSING NEGATIVITY IN SPEECH AND GESTURES OF SI-ERS COUNTERFACTUAL SOVIET PHOTOGRAPHY THROUGH THE LENS OF AMERICAN AND BRITISH ART CRITICS: EVALUATIVE DIMENSIONS OF ART DISCOURSE PRECEDENCE IN PARADIGMATICS AND SYNTAGMATICS (on the example of comparisons in modern German)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1