The Predictive Value of Stair Climbing Test on Postoperative Complications in Lung Cancer Patients with Limited Pulmonary Function.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00034
Fei Xiao, Weipeng Shao, Jin Zhang, Huanshun Wen, Yongqing Guo, Deruo Liu, Chaoyang Liang
{"title":"The Predictive Value of Stair Climbing Test on Postoperative Complications in Lung Cancer Patients with Limited Pulmonary Function.","authors":"Fei Xiao,&nbsp;Weipeng Shao,&nbsp;Jin Zhang,&nbsp;Huanshun Wen,&nbsp;Yongqing Guo,&nbsp;Deruo Liu,&nbsp;Chaoyang Liang","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the predictive value of stair climbing test (SCT) on postoperative complications in lung cancer patients with limited pulmonary function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 727 hospitalized lung cancer patients with limited pulmonary function were retrospectively reviewed. Included in the cohort were 424 patients who underwent SCT preoperatively. Patients were grouped according to general condition, past medical history, surgical approach, pulmonary function test, and SCT results. Comparison of the postoperative cardiopulmonary complication rates was made and independent risk factors were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 cardiopulmonary-related complications occurred in 69 cases, accounting for 16.3% of the entire cohort. The postoperative cardiopulmonary complication rates were significantly different between groups stratified by smoking index, percentage of forced expiratory volume in one second, percentage of diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, SCT results, excision extension, and anesthetic duration (p <0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that only height achieved (p <0.001), changes in heart rate (∆HR; p <0.001), and excision extension (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for postoperative cardiopulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SCT could be used as a preoperative screening method for lung cancer patients with limited pulmonary function. For those patients who could only climb less than 6 floors or had ∆HR >30 bpm in the test, sublobar resection should be selected to reduce the postoperative cardiopulmonary complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":8037,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/7d/atcs-28-381.PMC9763715.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive value of stair climbing test (SCT) on postoperative complications in lung cancer patients with limited pulmonary function.

Methods: A total of 727 hospitalized lung cancer patients with limited pulmonary function were retrospectively reviewed. Included in the cohort were 424 patients who underwent SCT preoperatively. Patients were grouped according to general condition, past medical history, surgical approach, pulmonary function test, and SCT results. Comparison of the postoperative cardiopulmonary complication rates was made and independent risk factors were identified.

Results: A total of 89 cardiopulmonary-related complications occurred in 69 cases, accounting for 16.3% of the entire cohort. The postoperative cardiopulmonary complication rates were significantly different between groups stratified by smoking index, percentage of forced expiratory volume in one second, percentage of diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, SCT results, excision extension, and anesthetic duration (p <0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that only height achieved (p <0.001), changes in heart rate (∆HR; p <0.001), and excision extension (p = 0.006) were independent risk factors for postoperative cardiopulmonary complications.

Conclusions: The SCT could be used as a preoperative screening method for lung cancer patients with limited pulmonary function. For those patients who could only climb less than 6 floors or had ∆HR >30 bpm in the test, sublobar resection should be selected to reduce the postoperative cardiopulmonary complication rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爬楼梯试验对肺功能受限肺癌患者术后并发症的预测价值。
目的:探讨爬楼梯试验(SCT)对肺功能受限肺癌患者术后并发症的预测价值。方法:回顾性分析727例肺功能受限肺癌住院患者的临床资料。该队列包括424例术前接受SCT的患者。患者根据一般情况、既往病史、手术入路、肺功能检查和SCT结果进行分组。比较两组术后心肺并发症发生率,确定独立危险因素。结果:69例共发生89例心肺相关并发症,占整个队列的16.3%。以吸烟指数、1秒用力呼气量百分比、一氧化碳弥散量百分比、SCT结果、切除时间、麻醉时间分层的组间术后心肺并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:SCT可作为肺功能受限肺癌患者的术前筛查方法。对于只能爬6层以下或试验中∆HR > 30bpm的患者,应选择叶下切除术,以减少术后心肺并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Arterial Embolization and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Lung Resection for Anomalous Systemic Arterial Blood Supply to Normal Lung: Two Case Reports. Surgery for Ascending Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Valve Insufficiency in Conditions of Active Proceeding Syphilitic Aortitis and Valvulitis. Impact of Graft Velocity on Saphenous Vein Graft Atherosclerosis after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Surgery for Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax with Chronic Lung Diseases. Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1