使用观察者工具在高保真模拟期间增强麻醉住院医师非技术技能的学习:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3
Caroline Havard, Viridiana Jouffroy, Agnès Le Gouez, Marie Bruyère, Samy Figueiredo, Philippe Roulleau, Dan Benhamou, Aurore Margat, Antonia Blanié
{"title":"使用观察者工具在高保真模拟期间增强麻醉住院医师非技术技能的学习:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Caroline Havard, Viridiana Jouffroy, Agnès Le Gouez, Marie Bruyère, Samy Figueiredo, Philippe Roulleau, Dan Benhamou, Aurore Margat, Antonia Blanié","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of an observer tool (OT) has been shown to improve learning of technical skills through observation in simulation. The objective was to assess the impact of a non-technical OT on anaesthesia residents' learning of non-technical skills (NTS) during simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After consent, residents were randomised into 2 groups: OT+ (with an OT based on NTS to be systematically completed during observation of others) and OT- (without OT). Both groups observed a high-fidelity simulation of crisis management (with or without OT), then were asked to perform actively another simulation. The primary outcome was NTS performance, assessed by an evaluator using the Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills score (ANTS score out of 16) on video recording. Secondary outcomes were results of score items, satisfaction, team performance, and professional impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found between OT + group (n = 33) and OT- group (n = 30) for the ANTS score (OT + 12 [9.5-12.5], OT- 10.5 [8.75-12]/16 (p = 0.13)). Among sub-items of the ANTS score, decision-making was significantly better in the OT + group (3 [2-3] versus 2 [2-3], p = 0.01). Satisfaction, team performance and perception of professional impact were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed no significant difference in learning of observational anaesthesia resident's NTS whether or not they were provided a non-technical OT during crisis management simulation. Decision-making was better with an OT. Further work is necessary to define the place of OT in observer-based learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749093/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of an observer tool to enhance learning of anaesthesia resident's non-technical skills during high-fidelity simulation: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Havard, Viridiana Jouffroy, Agnès Le Gouez, Marie Bruyère, Samy Figueiredo, Philippe Roulleau, Dan Benhamou, Aurore Margat, Antonia Blanié\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of an observer tool (OT) has been shown to improve learning of technical skills through observation in simulation. The objective was to assess the impact of a non-technical OT on anaesthesia residents' learning of non-technical skills (NTS) during simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After consent, residents were randomised into 2 groups: OT+ (with an OT based on NTS to be systematically completed during observation of others) and OT- (without OT). Both groups observed a high-fidelity simulation of crisis management (with or without OT), then were asked to perform actively another simulation. The primary outcome was NTS performance, assessed by an evaluator using the Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills score (ANTS score out of 16) on video recording. Secondary outcomes were results of score items, satisfaction, team performance, and professional impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found between OT + group (n = 33) and OT- group (n = 30) for the ANTS score (OT + 12 [9.5-12.5], OT- 10.5 [8.75-12]/16 (p = 0.13)). Among sub-items of the ANTS score, decision-making was significantly better in the OT + group (3 [2-3] versus 2 [2-3], p = 0.01). Satisfaction, team performance and perception of professional impact were not significantly different between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed no significant difference in learning of observational anaesthesia resident's NTS whether or not they were provided a non-technical OT during crisis management simulation. Decision-making was better with an OT. Further work is necessary to define the place of OT in observer-based learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749093/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06608-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察者工具(OT)的使用已被证明可以通过模拟观察来提高技术技能的学习。目的是评估非技术OT对麻醉住院医师在模拟过程中学习非技术技能(NTS)的影响。方法:经同意后,将住院患者随机分为两组:OT+(在观察他人的过程中系统地完成基于NTS的OT)和OT-(不进行OT)。两组都观察了一个高保真的危机管理模拟(有或没有OT),然后被要求积极地进行另一个模拟。主要结果是NTS的表现,由评估者使用视频记录的麻醉非技术技能评分(ANTS评分为16分)进行评估。次要结果是得分项目、满意度、团队绩效和专业影响的结果。结果:OT +组(n = 33)与OT-组(n = 30)的ANTS评分(OT + 12 [9.5 ~ 12.5] /16, OT- 10.5 [8.75 ~ 12]/16, p = 0.13)差异无统计学意义。在ANTS分项评分中,OT +组的决策能力显著优于OT +组(3[2-3]比2 [2-3],p = 0.01)。满意度、团队绩效和职业影响感知在组间无显著差异。结论:本研究显示,在危机管理模拟过程中,是否提供非技术OT,住院医师观察麻醉的NTS学习无显著差异。OT的决策效果更好。需要进一步的工作来确定OT在基于观察者的学习中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of an observer tool to enhance learning of anaesthesia resident's non-technical skills during high-fidelity simulation: a randomised controlled trial.

Background: The use of an observer tool (OT) has been shown to improve learning of technical skills through observation in simulation. The objective was to assess the impact of a non-technical OT on anaesthesia residents' learning of non-technical skills (NTS) during simulation.

Methods: After consent, residents were randomised into 2 groups: OT+ (with an OT based on NTS to be systematically completed during observation of others) and OT- (without OT). Both groups observed a high-fidelity simulation of crisis management (with or without OT), then were asked to perform actively another simulation. The primary outcome was NTS performance, assessed by an evaluator using the Anaesthesia Non-Technical Skills score (ANTS score out of 16) on video recording. Secondary outcomes were results of score items, satisfaction, team performance, and professional impact.

Results: No significant difference was found between OT + group (n = 33) and OT- group (n = 30) for the ANTS score (OT + 12 [9.5-12.5], OT- 10.5 [8.75-12]/16 (p = 0.13)). Among sub-items of the ANTS score, decision-making was significantly better in the OT + group (3 [2-3] versus 2 [2-3], p = 0.01). Satisfaction, team performance and perception of professional impact were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions: This study showed no significant difference in learning of observational anaesthesia resident's NTS whether or not they were provided a non-technical OT during crisis management simulation. Decision-making was better with an OT. Further work is necessary to define the place of OT in observer-based learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
A Delphi-based needs assessment to identify and prioritise procedural skills through consensus for simulation-based learning in neurosurgery. Adaptation and assessment of the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the nursing student competence scale. Advancing pre-clinical surgical education by using intuitive short videos. Effects of self-controlled feedback on learning range of motion measurement techniques and self-efficacy among physical therapy students: a preliminary study. Implementing the flipped classroom model to enhance knowledge retention in pharmacology: a local case study at Semmelweis university.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1