Pub Date : 2010-10-18DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20865-2_6
Christos Bellos, A. Papadopoulos, D. Fotiadis, R. Rosso
{"title":"An intelligent system for classification of patients suffering from chronic diseases","authors":"Christos Bellos, A. Papadopoulos, D. Fotiadis, R. Rosso","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20865-2_6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20865-2_6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":107961,"journal":{"name":"2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125570677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2010-06-23DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13769-3_56
A. Kodewitz, I. Keck, A. Tomé, J. Górriz, E. Lang
{"title":"Exploratory matrix factorization for PET image analysis","authors":"A. Kodewitz, I. Keck, A. Tomé, J. Górriz, E. Lang","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-13769-3_56","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13769-3_56","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":107961,"journal":{"name":"2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2010-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132817883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5741954
A. Murguialday, E. Soares, N. Birbaumer
Motor imagery-based brain computer interface (BCI) technologh has mototor rehabilitation as one of its main fields of application. The use of a BCI as a neuroprosthetic for paralyzed limb motor restoration implies normally absence of muscle activity. It is still an open question whether residual motor activity in healthy individuals or in patients causes a bias in the modulation of a motor imagery-based BCI control signal. Although the influence of electromyographical (EMG) activity in necka nd cranial muscles upon BCI has been studied, not much has been said concerning the revelance of EMG activity arising from arm muscles. We therefore used a hand motor imagery-based BCI system paradigm designed for motor rehabilitation coupling a BCI with an online driven robotic orthosis to compare different EMG activity detection methods regarding their influence in the resulting analysis of neurophysiological signals. Fourteen healthy subjects underwent four sessions in which they were asked to perform motor imagery task alone (receiving no feedback), motor imagery with (visual and proprioceptive)feedback, active movement, passive movement and rest. Six different EMG feature extraction methods were calculated and three different data time windows were used for muscle activity threshold definition. Three different electrode spatial distributions were utilized for removing the EMG artifacts: a) coming from all the electrodes on the arms, b) just the ones placed on the imagery side and c) just the ones on the healthy arm. We compared the different EMG rejection methods by calculating the number of trials deemed artifact-free by each method. In this paper we demonstrate that different EMG artifact removal methods lead to distinct partitions of the total available data, thus yielding different influence of the method used to remove EMG artifacts on task related artifacts regarding number of trials contaminated and the differences in trials rejected using the different methods.
{"title":"Upper limb EMG artifact rejection in motor sensitive BCIs","authors":"A. Murguialday, E. Soares, N. Birbaumer","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5741954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5741954","url":null,"abstract":"Motor imagery-based brain computer interface (BCI) technologh has mototor rehabilitation as one of its main fields of application. The use of a BCI as a neuroprosthetic for paralyzed limb motor restoration implies normally absence of muscle activity. It is still an open question whether residual motor activity in healthy individuals or in patients causes a bias in the modulation of a motor imagery-based BCI control signal. Although the influence of electromyographical (EMG) activity in necka nd cranial muscles upon BCI has been studied, not much has been said concerning the revelance of EMG activity arising from arm muscles. We therefore used a hand motor imagery-based BCI system paradigm designed for motor rehabilitation coupling a BCI with an online driven robotic orthosis to compare different EMG activity detection methods regarding their influence in the resulting analysis of neurophysiological signals. Fourteen healthy subjects underwent four sessions in which they were asked to perform motor imagery task alone (receiving no feedback), motor imagery with (visual and proprioceptive)feedback, active movement, passive movement and rest. Six different EMG feature extraction methods were calculated and three different data time windows were used for muscle activity threshold definition. Three different electrode spatial distributions were utilized for removing the EMG artifacts: a) coming from all the electrodes on the arms, b) just the ones placed on the imagery side and c) just the ones on the healthy arm. We compared the different EMG rejection methods by calculating the number of trials deemed artifact-free by each method. In this paper we demonstrate that different EMG artifact removal methods lead to distinct partitions of the total available data, thus yielding different influence of the method used to remove EMG artifacts on task related artifacts regarding number of trials contaminated and the differences in trials rejected using the different methods.","PeriodicalId":107961,"journal":{"name":"2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125051233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：