Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1007/s11049-025-09686-0
Isabelle Charnavel
{"title":"Appealing to superlative clauses: Or how to split the scope of superlative adjectives across intensional verbs.","authors":"Isabelle Charnavel","doi":"10.1007/s11049-025-09686-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-025-09686-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":18975,"journal":{"name":"Natural Language & Linguistic Theory","volume":"44 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12605664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145513511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1177/09636625251400658
Lena Zils, Julia Metag, Niels G Mede, Mike S Schäfer
Understanding how media influence public attitudes toward science during societal challenges is crucial for effective science communication. This study examines the role of media use and sociodemographic factors in shaping public attitudes toward science in Switzerland using panel data from three surveys over 6 years (N2016 = 1,051; N2019 = 339; N2022 = 122). Results show that media usage and sociodemographics influenced attitudes, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lower education and stronger religiosity correlated with reduced interest in or trust in science. Use of online legacy media showed rally-around-the-flag effects, but we found no clear differences between public and private broadcasters regarding their impact on science attitudes. These findings highlight the relationship of media use, sociodemographics, and public attitudes during societal uncertainty and over time, offering insights for targeted, context-sensitive science communication.
{"title":"Long-term media effects on public attitudes toward science in Switzerland: A panel survey of the Swiss population.","authors":"Lena Zils, Julia Metag, Niels G Mede, Mike S Schäfer","doi":"10.1177/09636625251400658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625251400658","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding how media influence public attitudes toward science during societal challenges is crucial for effective science communication. This study examines the role of media use and sociodemographic factors in shaping public attitudes toward science in Switzerland using panel data from three surveys over 6 years (<i>N<sub>2016</sub></i> = 1,051; <i>N<sub>2019</sub></i> = 339; <i>N<sub>2022</sub></i> = 122). Results show that media usage and sociodemographics influenced attitudes, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lower education and stronger religiosity correlated with reduced interest in or trust in science. Use of online legacy media showed rally-around-the-flag effects, but we found no clear differences between public and private broadcasters regarding their impact on science attitudes. These findings highlight the relationship of media use, sociodemographics, and public attitudes during societal uncertainty and over time, offering insights for targeted, context-sensitive science communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":" ","pages":"9636625251400658"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Lately, the misconduct in research among scientist has been escalating. The use of artificial intelligence has been converted in a double ace card, on one side it has simplificated the way of obtaining valious data for researchers in an easy way, but in the other hand, has promoted that researchers became careless about the scientific method. This situation has become a problem among university teachers since the students are tempt to obtain results in an easy way, leaving ethics aside. The objective of the study was to determine the knowledge and practices regarding scientific integrity among university students in Peru.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted, applying a validated survey on knowledge and practices regarding scientific integrity to 1,420 university students in the Southern Region of Peru, with 60.85% being women. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions, and data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Robust statistics were applied, and comparisons were made based on gender, age, and region. Ages ranged from 17 to 29 years (M = 21.14, SD = 2.72).
Results: The majority demonstrated high levels of knowledge and regular levels of practices regarding scientific integrity. Statistically significant differences were found based on gender (women > men), age (older than 23 years > younger than 22 years), and region. Inappropriate practices were identified in the use of artificial intelligence in academic work.
Conclusions: It was concluded that university students have high levels of knowledge regarding scientific integrity; however, they exhibit regular and low levels of application in research projects.
{"title":"Knowledge and practices about research integrity among Peruvian university students.","authors":"Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Hardy Erick Guerra-Pérez, Lucía Begazo-Muñoz-Del-Carpio, Luis Fernando Ramos-Vargas, Gonzalo Dávila-Del-Carpio, Yannina Melissa Peña-Pinto, Patricio Díaz-Del-Olmo-Calvo, Enrique Mendoza-Carrera, Emanuele Valenti","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01344-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01344-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lately, the misconduct in research among scientist has been escalating. The use of artificial intelligence has been converted in a double ace card, on one side it has simplificated the way of obtaining valious data for researchers in an easy way, but in the other hand, has promoted that researchers became careless about the scientific method. This situation has become a problem among university teachers since the students are tempt to obtain results in an easy way, leaving ethics aside. The objective of the study was to determine the knowledge and practices regarding scientific integrity among university students in Peru.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted, applying a validated survey on knowledge and practices regarding scientific integrity to 1,420 university students in the Southern Region of Peru, with 60.85% being women. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions, and data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Robust statistics were applied, and comparisons were made based on gender, age, and region. Ages ranged from 17 to 29 years (M = 21.14, SD = 2.72).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority demonstrated high levels of knowledge and regular levels of practices regarding scientific integrity. Statistically significant differences were found based on gender (women > men), age (older than 23 years > younger than 22 years), and region. Inappropriate practices were identified in the use of artificial intelligence in academic work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was concluded that university students have high levels of knowledge regarding scientific integrity; however, they exhibit regular and low levels of application in research projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100971
Jingtian Sydney Wang , Debing Feng
While existing research has extensively explored corporate communications on social media, limited attention has been paid to how Chinese corporations leverage government policies to manage corporate reputation and foster government-enterprise relationships. This study addresses this gap by introducing the concept of “policywashing”, defined as the strategic reconstruction and mediation of state policies in corporate discourse. Drawing on framing theory and recontextualization, we analyze 170 Weibo posts from Chinese corporations to examine how they recontextualize the government-promoted “craftsmanship spirit” policy. Findings reveal that corporations repurpose this policy through four interrelated frames: product excellence, policy endorsement, employee excellence and audience engagement. These frames highlight tensions between corporate consumerism and corporate commitment to government policies. More critically, such repurposing risks distorting policy intent, thereby giving rise to the phenomenon of policywashing. This study contributes to understanding how corporations strategically appropriate state discourse for brand management, with implications for policy implementation and corporate accountability.
{"title":"Policywashing: Recontextualizing the “Craftsmanship Spirit” policy in corporate Weibo discourse","authors":"Jingtian Sydney Wang , Debing Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100971","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.dcm.2025.100971","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While existing research has extensively explored corporate communications on social media, limited attention has been paid to how Chinese corporations leverage government policies to manage corporate reputation and foster government-enterprise relationships. This study addresses this gap by introducing the concept of “policywashing”, defined as the strategic reconstruction and mediation of state policies in corporate discourse. Drawing on framing theory and recontextualization, we analyze 170 Weibo posts from Chinese corporations to examine how they recontextualize the government-promoted “craftsmanship spirit” policy. Findings reveal that corporations repurpose this policy through four interrelated frames: product excellence, policy endorsement, employee excellence and audience engagement. These frames highlight tensions between corporate consumerism and corporate commitment to government policies. More critically, such repurposing risks distorting policy intent, thereby giving rise to the phenomenon of policywashing. This study contributes to understanding how corporations strategically appropriate state discourse for brand management, with implications for policy implementation and corporate accountability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46649,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Context & Media","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 100971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145738842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2025.101010
Ke Li , Ying Hong , Chen Hao
As academic writing becomes increasingly digital and multimodal, traditional assessments of L2 writing self-efficacy—centered exclusively on print-based, monomodal tasks—inadequately represent learners' confidence in contemporary composition practices. While existing self-efficacy instruments have advanced our understanding of writing beliefs, including recent multidimensional scales and emerging work on multimodal processes, no validated tool specifically measures L2 writers' perceived efficacy in performing integrated multimodal academic writing tasks. This gap is particularly consequential as EAP assessments increasingly require students to synthesize audio, visual, and textual sources within digitally mediated writing environments—demands that extend beyond the constructs captured by existing scales. This study introduces and validates the Multimodal Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (MAWSE), designed to assess L2 writers' beliefs about their capabilities in four theoretically distinct dimensions: digital content comprehension (interpreting multimodal sources), multimodal discourse synthesis (integrating cross-modal information), genre and format navigation (adapting to multimodal conventions), and self-regulation across digital platforms (managing multimodal composing processes). Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we gathered data from 1063 EFL university students across three institutional contexts in China. Qualitative think-aloud protocols informed item development, while exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established construct validity. Multi-group invariance testing confirmed measurement equivalence across key and non-key university groups, and structural equation modeling revealed that MAWSE scores significantly predicted performance on scenario-based academic writing tasks involving integrated multimodal sources (β = 0.41, p < .01). The findings offer a psychometrically robust, construct-relevant tool that extends existing self-efficacy frameworks into the multimodal domain, addressing an empirical gap while supporting more accurate and equitable assessment practices in digitally enriched EAP contexts. This research contributes to evolving scholarship by validating an instrument aligned with the realities of contemporary academic communication.
随着学术写作变得越来越数字化和多模式,传统的第二语言写作自我效能评估——仅仅以基于印刷的、单一模式的任务为中心——不足以代表学习者对当代写作实践的信心。虽然现有的自我效能工具已经提高了我们对写作信念的理解,包括最近的多维尺度和关于多模式过程的新兴工作,但没有经过验证的工具专门衡量第二语言作者在执行综合多模式学术写作任务时的感知效能。随着EAP评估越来越多地要求学生在数字媒介的写作环境中综合音频、视觉和文本资源,这一要求超出了现有量表所捕获的结构,这一差距尤其重要。本研究引入并验证了多模态学术写作自我效能量表(MAWSE),该量表旨在从四个理论上不同的维度评估二语作者对自己能力的信念:数字内容理解(解释多模态来源)、多模态话语合成(整合跨模态信息)、体裁和格式导航(适应多模态惯例)以及跨数字平台的自我调节(管理多模态写作过程)。采用顺序混合方法设计,我们收集了来自中国三个机构背景下的1063名英语大学学生的数据。定性的有声思考协议为项目开发提供了信息,而探索性和验证性因素分析建立了结构效度。多组不变性检验证实了重点大学组和非重点大学组之间的测量等效性,结构方程模型显示,MAWSE分数显著预测了涉及综合多模态来源的基于场景的学术写作任务的表现(β = 0.41, p <; .01)。研究结果提供了一种心理测量学上稳健的、与构建相关的工具,将现有的自我效能框架扩展到多模态领域,解决了经验差距,同时支持在数字化丰富的EAP背景下更准确、更公平的评估实践。这项研究通过验证一种符合当代学术交流现实的工具,为不断发展的学术做出了贡献。
{"title":"Beyond the page: A multimodal self-efficacy framework for assessing L2 digital-academic writing","authors":"Ke Li , Ying Hong , Chen Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.101010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.101010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As academic writing becomes increasingly digital and multimodal, traditional assessments of L2 writing self-efficacy—centered exclusively on print-based, monomodal tasks—inadequately represent learners' confidence in contemporary composition practices. While existing self-efficacy instruments have advanced our understanding of writing beliefs, including recent multidimensional scales and emerging work on multimodal processes, no validated tool specifically measures L2 writers' perceived efficacy in performing integrated multimodal academic writing tasks. This gap is particularly consequential as EAP assessments increasingly require students to synthesize audio, visual, and textual sources within digitally mediated writing environments—demands that extend beyond the constructs captured by existing scales. This study introduces and validates the Multimodal Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (MAWSE), designed to assess L2 writers' beliefs about their capabilities in four theoretically distinct dimensions: digital content comprehension (interpreting multimodal sources), multimodal discourse synthesis (integrating cross-modal information), genre and format navigation (adapting to multimodal conventions), and self-regulation across digital platforms (managing multimodal composing processes). Using a sequential mixed-methods design, we gathered data from 1063 EFL university students across three institutional contexts in China. Qualitative think-aloud protocols informed item development, while exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses established construct validity. Multi-group invariance testing confirmed measurement equivalence across key and non-key university groups, and structural equation modeling revealed that MAWSE scores significantly predicted performance on scenario-based academic writing tasks involving integrated multimodal sources (β = 0.41, p < .01). The findings offer a psychometrically robust, construct-relevant tool that extends existing self-efficacy frameworks into the multimodal domain, addressing an empirical gap while supporting more accurate and equitable assessment practices in digitally enriched EAP contexts. This research contributes to evolving scholarship by validating an instrument aligned with the realities of contemporary academic communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101010"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145736764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Georgia Lorenzini, Laura Arbelaez Ossa, David Shaw, Bernice Elger
Artificial intelligence (AI) based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are becoming ever more widespread in healthcare and could play an important role in diagnostic and treatment processes. For this reason, AI-based CDSS has an impact on the doctor-patient relationship, shaping their decisions with its suggestions. We may be on the verge of a paradigm shift, where the doctor-patient relationship is no longer a dual relationship, but a triad. This paper analyses the role of AI-based CDSS for shared decision-making (SDM) to better comprehend its promise and associated ethical issues. Moreover, it investigates how certain AI implementations may instead foster the inappropriate paradigm of paternalism. Understanding how AI relates to doctors and influences doctor-patient communication is essential to promote more ethical medical practice. Both doctors' and patients' autonomy need to be considered in the light of AI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and the Doctor-Patient Relationship Expanding the Paradigm of Shared Decision Making.","authors":"Georgia Lorenzini, Laura Arbelaez Ossa, David Shaw, Bernice Elger","doi":"10.1111/bioe.13128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are becoming ever more widespread in healthcare and could play an important role in diagnostic and treatment processes. For this reason, AI-based CDSS has an impact on the doctor-patient relationship, shaping their decisions with its suggestions. We may be on the verge of a paradigm shift, where the doctor-patient relationship is no longer a dual relationship, but a triad. This paper analyses the role of AI-based CDSS for shared decision-making (SDM) to better comprehend its promise and associated ethical issues. Moreover, it investigates how certain AI implementations may instead foster the inappropriate paradigm of paternalism. Understanding how AI relates to doctors and influences doctor-patient communication is essential to promote more ethical medical practice. Both doctors' and patients' autonomy need to be considered in the light of AI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1080/00026980.2025.2594941
Robin Mackie, Gerrylynn K Roberts
Historians suggesting an early phase of globalisation in the decades before the First World War have pointed to new specialist learned societies as among the agents in the process. This paper explores the international dimensions of national chemical societies in this era of empires. During the nineteenth century, national chemical societies were established in many countries. Four of the earliest and largest - the [British] Chemical Society (founded 1841), the Société Chimique de France (1857), the Deutsche Chemische Gesellschaft (1867), and the American Chemical Society (1876) - recruited numerous members living abroad, so that, by the early twentieth century, such "extra-national" members - members, that is, who lived outside the state in which the society was based - constituted a substantial share of their memberships. Our paper examines this phenomenon. It argues that an analysis of extra-national members can help us chart the spread of chemistry around the globe. It considers whether the extra-national memberships of these chemical societies can be seen as constituting early, overlapping global networks of individuals, based on their common membership of leading societies.
{"title":"National Chemical Societies and the Formation of Early Global Networks, ca. 1890-1914.","authors":"Robin Mackie, Gerrylynn K Roberts","doi":"10.1080/00026980.2025.2594941","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00026980.2025.2594941","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historians suggesting an early phase of globalisation in the decades before the First World War have pointed to new specialist learned societies as among the agents in the process. This paper explores the international dimensions of national chemical societies in this era of empires. During the nineteenth century, national chemical societies were established in many countries. Four of the earliest and largest - the [British] Chemical Society (founded 1841), the <i>Société Chimique de France</i> (1857), the <i>Deutsche Chemische Gesellschaft</i> (1867), and the American Chemical Society (1876) - recruited numerous members living abroad, so that, by the early twentieth century, such \"extra-national\" members - members, that is, who lived outside the state in which the society was based - constituted a substantial share of their memberships. Our paper examines this phenomenon. It argues that an analysis of extra-national members can help us chart the spread of chemistry around the globe. It considers whether the extra-national memberships of these chemical societies can be seen as constituting early, overlapping global networks of individuals, based on their common membership of leading societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50963,"journal":{"name":"Ambix","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101279
Qi Qi , Cecilia Guanfang Zhao
While interest in identity issues continues to grow in second language writing research, the construction of discoursal scholarly identity in research writing remains underexplored, particularly for transnational scholars. This case study, grounded in Ivanič’s (1998) framework of discoursal construction of writer identity, examined two Chinese transnational scholars’ perceptions and constructions of their discoursal scholarly identities in academic publishing over time and across space. Analysis of their self-identified representative works, relevant text histories, and reported writing experiences revealed that as the scholars’ academic experiences evolved, they developed a deeper understanding of discoursal scholarly identity, and negotiated an intended scholarly identity by navigating complex relationships with community members, rather than passively meeting gatekeepers’ expectations. While adapting to the local academic environment, they also leveraged international knowledge and resources to shape and develop their desired discoursal scholarly identity. Theoretically, these findings refine our understanding of discoursal identity construction in relation to concepts of time and space. Practically, the study provides pedagogical guidance to writing instructors and educators on how they could best support transnational and multilingual writers in developing their scholarly identities while navigating relationships with various stakeholders across different contexts and career stages.
{"title":"Constructing discoursal scholarly identities in research writing over time and across space: A case study of Chinese transnational scholars","authors":"Qi Qi , Cecilia Guanfang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101279","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101279","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While interest in identity issues continues to grow in second language writing research, the construction of discoursal scholarly identity in research writing remains underexplored, particularly for transnational scholars. This case study, grounded in Ivanič’s (1998) framework of discoursal construction of writer identity, examined two Chinese transnational scholars’ perceptions and constructions of their discoursal scholarly identities in academic publishing over time and across space. Analysis of their self-identified representative works, relevant text histories, and reported writing experiences revealed that as the scholars’ academic experiences evolved, they developed a deeper understanding of discoursal scholarly identity, and negotiated an intended scholarly identity by navigating complex relationships with community members, rather than passively meeting gatekeepers’ expectations. While adapting to the local academic environment, they also leveraged international knowledge and resources to shape and develop their desired discoursal scholarly identity. Theoretically, these findings refine our understanding of discoursal identity construction in relation to concepts of time and space. Practically, the study provides pedagogical guidance to writing instructors and educators on how they could best support transnational and multilingual writers in developing their scholarly identities while navigating relationships with various stakeholders across different contexts and career stages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 101279"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1186/s12910-025-01327-w
Faramarz Kalhor, Zahra Tagharrobi, Mehdi Ghaderian, Mohsen Taghadosi, Amir Shahzeydi, Atefeh Mah-Najafabadi, Sakineh Sharifi
Background: Congenital heart defects (CHD) are a significant cause of prenatal and postnatal morbidity and mortality, leading to complex ethical and moral decisions for parents when diagnosed in utero. The decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy after a CHD diagnosis involves multifaceted considerations, including cultural, religious, and personal values, alongside medical, ethical, and socioeconomic factors. This systematic review delves into the multifaceted moral considerations involved in the decision-making process regarding continuing a pregnancy following a CHD diagnosis.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using a narrative synthesis approach. Peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies addressing ethical issues related to parental decision-making and clinical care following a prenatal CHD diagnosis were included. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, ProQuest, ERIC, and Embase. Findings were synthesized thematically to identify key ethical tensions, factors contributing to moral complexity, challenges faced by parents and healthcare providers, and supportive strategies.
Results: The synthesis of 25 studies from North America, Europe, Australia, and the Middle East (Iran) revealed a universal parental experience of acute psychological crisis following a prenatal diagnosis of CHD. However, the ethical frameworks guiding parental decision-making were highly context-dependent. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) a central ethical tension between the sanctity of life and the quality of life, with perspectives strongly shaped by religious beliefs, legal statutes, and cultural norms; (2) The Lived Experience of the Decision-Making Crisis; and (3) Strategies for Navigating the Ethical Terrain.
Conclusion: A prenatal CHD diagnosis initiates a profound moral journey for parents that extends far beyond a medical decision. The resulting psychological crisis-driven by the tension between sanctity and quality of life-underscores the need for a shift in clinical practice. Evidence supports the adoption of a holistic, multidisciplinary framework grounded in cultural sensitivity and empathetic communication to empower parents in making value-congruent choices during one of life's most difficult experiences.
背景:先天性心脏缺陷(CHD)是产前和产后发病率和死亡率的重要原因,导致父母在子宫内诊断时面临复杂的伦理和道德决策。在诊断出冠心病后,继续或终止妊娠的决定涉及多方面的考虑,包括文化、宗教和个人价值观,以及医学、伦理和社会经济因素。本系统综述深入探讨了在冠心病诊断后继续妊娠的决策过程中涉及的多方面的道德考虑。方法:采用叙事综合方法对文献进行系统回顾。同行评议的定性、定量和混合方法研究涉及产前冠心病诊断后父母决策和临床护理相关的伦理问题。在MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science (WOS)、CINAHL、ProQuest、ERIC和Embase等多个数据库中进行了全面的搜索。研究结果按主题进行综合,以确定关键的伦理紧张关系、导致道德复杂性的因素、父母和医疗保健提供者面临的挑战以及支持策略。结果:来自北美、欧洲、澳大利亚和中东(伊朗)的25项研究的综合揭示了产前诊断为冠心病后父母普遍经历急性心理危机。然而,指导父母决策的伦理框架是高度情境依赖的。出现了三个主要主题:(1)生命的神圣性和生活质量之间的核心伦理紧张关系,其观点受到宗教信仰、法律法规和文化规范的强烈影响;(2)决策危机的生活体验;(3)伦理地形导航策略。结论:产前冠心病诊断为父母开启了深刻的道德之旅,远远超出了医疗决定。由此产生的心理危机——由圣洁和生活质量之间的紧张关系所驱动——强调了临床实践转变的必要性。证据支持采用以文化敏感性和移情沟通为基础的整体多学科框架,使父母能够在人生最困难的经历之一中做出价值一致的选择。
{"title":"Ethical dilemmas in continuing pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.","authors":"Faramarz Kalhor, Zahra Tagharrobi, Mehdi Ghaderian, Mohsen Taghadosi, Amir Shahzeydi, Atefeh Mah-Najafabadi, Sakineh Sharifi","doi":"10.1186/s12910-025-01327-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01327-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital heart defects (CHD) are a significant cause of prenatal and postnatal morbidity and mortality, leading to complex ethical and moral decisions for parents when diagnosed in utero. The decision to continue or terminate a pregnancy after a CHD diagnosis involves multifaceted considerations, including cultural, religious, and personal values, alongside medical, ethical, and socioeconomic factors. This systematic review delves into the multifaceted moral considerations involved in the decision-making process regarding continuing a pregnancy following a CHD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted using a narrative synthesis approach. Peer-reviewed qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies addressing ethical issues related to parental decision-making and clinical care following a prenatal CHD diagnosis were included. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, ProQuest, ERIC, and Embase. Findings were synthesized thematically to identify key ethical tensions, factors contributing to moral complexity, challenges faced by parents and healthcare providers, and supportive strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis of 25 studies from North America, Europe, Australia, and the Middle East (Iran) revealed a universal parental experience of acute psychological crisis following a prenatal diagnosis of CHD. However, the ethical frameworks guiding parental decision-making were highly context-dependent. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) a central ethical tension between the sanctity of life and the quality of life, with perspectives strongly shaped by religious beliefs, legal statutes, and cultural norms; (2) The Lived Experience of the Decision-Making Crisis; and (3) Strategies for Navigating the Ethical Terrain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A prenatal CHD diagnosis initiates a profound moral journey for parents that extends far beyond a medical decision. The resulting psychological crisis-driven by the tension between sanctity and quality of life-underscores the need for a shift in clinical practice. Evidence supports the adoption of a holistic, multidisciplinary framework grounded in cultural sensitivity and empathetic communication to empower parents in making value-congruent choices during one of life's most difficult experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":55348,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Ethics","volume":"26 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1080/00026980.2025.2598102
Mizuki Endo
The supply of experimental materials greatly influences the practice of science. Before the establishment of modern commercial distribution systems for experimental materials, researchers often used mundane substances. The wires of the harpsichord, a representative keyboard instrument of the Baroque era, were used as "multifaceted materials" in physical and chemical experiments from the eighteenth to the nineteenth centuries. Because the wires were made of largely pure iron, they were utilised as a standard substance in permanganometry until their impurities proved experimentally problematic. Although the early wires gradually disappeared from chemical experiments around the beginning of the twentieth century, they were reincarnated as steel wires with the advent of the modern harpsichord and reemerged as actors on the musical stage in the context of Neoclassical music. As a result of shifting practices in the use of harpsichord wires, the concept of a standard substance in titration gradually took shape at the intersection of the histories of science and music.
{"title":"Harpsichord Wires as Multifaceted Materials in Scientific Experiments from the Eighteenth to the Nineteenth Centuries.","authors":"Mizuki Endo","doi":"10.1080/00026980.2025.2598102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00026980.2025.2598102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The supply of experimental materials greatly influences the practice of science. Before the establishment of modern commercial distribution systems for experimental materials, researchers often used mundane substances. The wires of the harpsichord, a representative keyboard instrument of the Baroque era, were used as \"multifaceted materials\" in physical and chemical experiments from the eighteenth to the nineteenth centuries. Because the wires were made of largely pure iron, they were utilised as a standard substance in permanganometry until their impurities proved experimentally problematic. Although the early wires gradually disappeared from chemical experiments around the beginning of the twentieth century, they were reincarnated as steel wires with the advent of the modern harpsichord and reemerged as actors on the musical stage in the context of Neoclassical music. As a result of shifting practices in the use of harpsichord wires, the concept of a standard substance in titration gradually took shape at the intersection of the histories of science and music.</p>","PeriodicalId":50963,"journal":{"name":"Ambix","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145745609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}