Pub Date : 2021-11-22DOI: 10.1515/9783110759891-001
R. Němec
During their occupation of Eastern Europe, the National Socialists established detailed assessments of, and plans for, the whole region. This paper builds on the current state of research on the stakeholders, the practices and the techniques deployed in regional, urban and architectural planning, and explores the scope offered by combining the methodological perspectives of the history of architecture and the Digital Humanities to create a digital history of architecture. The development, use and theory of digital methods and processes offer new approaches to the assessment of the regional and urban architecture that was planned and implemented by the Nazi regime in Eastern Europe. They enable the use of mathematical measurements of specific features that support far more informative statements than are possible simply through qualitative observation. The work discusses the academic value that this adds to the examination of spatial definition, urban construction and architectural practices, and the need to combine this analysis with qualitative ap-
{"title":"Einleitung: Digital Humanities und die ‚Messbarkeit‘ des NS-Regimes","authors":"R. Němec","doi":"10.1515/9783110759891-001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110759891-001","url":null,"abstract":"During their occupation of Eastern Europe, the National Socialists established detailed assessments of, and plans for, the whole region. This paper builds on the current state of research on the stakeholders, the practices and the techniques deployed in regional, urban and architectural planning, and explores the scope offered by combining the methodological perspectives of the history of architecture and the Digital Humanities to create a digital history of architecture. The development, use and theory of digital methods and processes offer new approaches to the assessment of the regional and urban architecture that was planned and implemented by the Nazi regime in Eastern Europe. They enable the use of mathematical measurements of specific features that support far more informative statements than are possible simply through qualitative observation. The work discusses the academic value that this adds to the examination of spatial definition, urban construction and architectural practices, and the need to combine this analysis with qualitative ap-","PeriodicalId":135598,"journal":{"name":"Raumkonstruktionen | Spatial Constructions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134645224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-22DOI: 10.1515/9783110759891-007
Katja Bernhardt
Research on urban and spatial planning in time of National Socialism is searching for opportunities to apply methods of digital analysis. This paper attempts to subject this request to a constructive critique. It starts from the assumption of a principle mutual interdependence between quantitative and qualitative strategies of analysis. From this perspective the paper discusses the state of research and its deficits. It then describes the framework given for the modulation of automatically analysis. The review of the different layers of problems lead finally to a fundamental critique of the perspectives of research to date, with regard to urban and spatial planning in time of
{"title":"Digital Humanities und ‚Messbarkeit‘ des NSRegimes in der Raum- und Stadtplanung?","authors":"Katja Bernhardt","doi":"10.1515/9783110759891-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110759891-007","url":null,"abstract":"Research on urban and spatial planning in time of National Socialism is searching for opportunities to apply methods of digital analysis. This paper attempts to subject this request to a constructive critique. It starts from the assumption of a principle mutual interdependence between quantitative and qualitative strategies of analysis. From this perspective the paper discusses the state of research and its deficits. It then describes the framework given for the modulation of automatically analysis. The review of the different layers of problems lead finally to a fundamental critique of the perspectives of research to date, with regard to urban and spatial planning in time of","PeriodicalId":135598,"journal":{"name":"Raumkonstruktionen | Spatial Constructions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127255389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-22DOI: 10.1515/9783110759891-005
Miloš Hořejš
: After the Anschluss of Austria, Czechoslovakia was the next target of Nazi expansion to the east. Its border areas were initially occupied (October 1938) and then, on 15 March 1939, Nazi armies occupied the rest of the Czech Lands. A Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, fully under the control of the Nazi Reich, was created on the same day. This article deals with the implementation of architectonic and urbanistic concepts advocated by the Nazi regime in the occupied Czech Lands. The aim of Nazi-supported tendencies in architecture was to promote spatial and visual Germanisation of the occupied territories. The Nazi leadership was convinced that architecture and urbanism ought to function – both in Germany and in other occupied territories – as a symbol of German superiority and dominance. In the Protectorate, Nazi authorities clearly prioritised the implementation of architectonic and urbanistic patterns adopted from Germany. In the final part, the author briefly discusses plans for a new way of making these planned and actually implemented constructions more accessible in a specialised electronic map with specific expert content (geo-graphical information system – GIS).
{"title":"Relics of Nazi Architecture in the Czech Republic","authors":"Miloš Hořejš","doi":"10.1515/9783110759891-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110759891-005","url":null,"abstract":": After the Anschluss of Austria, Czechoslovakia was the next target of Nazi expansion to the east. Its border areas were initially occupied (October 1938) and then, on 15 March 1939, Nazi armies occupied the rest of the Czech Lands. A Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, fully under the control of the Nazi Reich, was created on the same day. This article deals with the implementation of architectonic and urbanistic concepts advocated by the Nazi regime in the occupied Czech Lands. The aim of Nazi-supported tendencies in architecture was to promote spatial and visual Germanisation of the occupied territories. The Nazi leadership was convinced that architecture and urbanism ought to function – both in Germany and in other occupied territories – as a symbol of German superiority and dominance. In the Protectorate, Nazi authorities clearly prioritised the implementation of architectonic and urbanistic patterns adopted from Germany. In the final part, the author briefly discusses plans for a new way of making these planned and actually implemented constructions more accessible in a specialised electronic map with specific expert content (geo-graphical information system – GIS).","PeriodicalId":135598,"journal":{"name":"Raumkonstruktionen | Spatial Constructions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125689306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-22DOI: 10.1515/9783110759891-002
Karl R. Kegler
Quantitative Methoden; NS-Raumplanung; Abstract: The collection, aggregation, and operationalisation of data has historical antecedents. This article examines the use of quantitative methods in Nazi spatial and population planning in three case studies: Gottfried Feder ’ s and Fritz Rechenberg ’ s urban planning theory, Gerhard Isenberg ’ s regional economic capacity method, and Walter Christaller ’ s wartime population distribution planning that was based on his Central Places Model. As a result, using these examples, it is found that figures that look precise and objective turn out to be based on questionable methodological, or rather ideological, suppositions. For the analysis of quantitative methods in their historical context, this evidence questions the connection between a pretended normality and normativity. Einschränkung ihrer Bedürfnisse, durch eine Senkung des Lebens-standards an. “ 28 Entwicklungs-möglichkeiten – guess Die Methode, angewandt reicht und müssen die Ergebnisse trüge-risch ist gelungen, den Grad der Überbevölkerung nachzuweisen, die ein-wandfreien Grundlagen eine Umverteilung der Bevölkerung zu erarbeiten.
定量Methoden;NS-Raumplanung;摘要:数据的收集、聚合和操作是有历史渊源的。本文通过三个案例考察了定量方法在纳粹空间和人口规划中的应用:戈特弗里德·费德和弗里茨·雷森伯格的城市规划理论，格哈德·伊森伯格的区域经济能力方法，以及沃尔特·克里斯塔勒基于其中心地模型的战时人口分布规划。结果，通过这些例子，我们发现那些看起来精确客观的数字实际上是基于有问题的方法论，或者更确切地说，是意识形态上的假设。对于定量方法在其历史背景下的分析，这一证据质疑了假装正常和规范之间的联系。Einschränkung ihrer bedrfnisse, durch eine Senkung des Lebens-standards and。[28] Entwicklungs-möglichkeiten - guess Die method, angewandt reicht und msssen Die Ergebnisse trge -risch ist gelungen, den Grad der Überbevölkerung nachzuweisen, Die ein-wandfreien Grundlagen eine umverilung der Bevölkerung zuerarbeen。
{"title":"Messbarkeit und Willkür in der NS-Siedlungsplanung","authors":"Karl R. Kegler","doi":"10.1515/9783110759891-002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110759891-002","url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative Methoden; NS-Raumplanung; Abstract: The collection, aggregation, and operationalisation of data has historical antecedents. This article examines the use of quantitative methods in Nazi spatial and population planning in three case studies: Gottfried Feder ’ s and Fritz Rechenberg ’ s urban planning theory, Gerhard Isenberg ’ s regional economic capacity method, and Walter Christaller ’ s wartime population distribution planning that was based on his Central Places Model. As a result, using these examples, it is found that figures that look precise and objective turn out to be based on questionable methodological, or rather ideological, suppositions. For the analysis of quantitative methods in their historical context, this evidence questions the connection between a pretended normality and normativity. Einschränkung ihrer Bedürfnisse, durch eine Senkung des Lebens-standards an. “ 28 Entwicklungs-möglichkeiten – guess Die Methode, angewandt reicht und müssen die Ergebnisse trüge-risch ist gelungen, den Grad der Überbevölkerung nachzuweisen, die ein-wandfreien Grundlagen eine Umverteilung der Bevölkerung zu erarbeiten.","PeriodicalId":135598,"journal":{"name":"Raumkonstruktionen | Spatial Constructions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116289621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：