The secretary is a profession that requires skills and expertise acquired through years of education, training and experience. Professional secretaries are able to show a positive image of the profession to fellow colleagues and business clients of the company. Professional secretaries also always maintain and improve their self-image by having a formal appearance that is appropriate to their work. But the profession of excellence of secretaries is not enough just to adjust the physical appearance, but must be experts in communication. Knowing communication techniques to superiors and fellow colleagues is one of the driving factors for increasing professionalism secretaries. Communication ethics is very beneficial for everyone, especially for the secretary in carrying out their functions in the company, namely building harmonious relationships in the internal and external environment of the company.
{"title":"Role of Communication Ethics Secretary in Improving Professionalism Secretary","authors":"Michael Dufan Sucianto, Kevin Prasetya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3313422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3313422","url":null,"abstract":"The secretary is a profession that requires skills and expertise acquired through years of education, training and experience. Professional secretaries are able to show a positive image of the profession to fellow colleagues and business clients of the company. Professional secretaries also always maintain and improve their self-image by having a formal appearance that is appropriate to their work. But the profession of excellence of secretaries is not enough just to adjust the physical appearance, but must be experts in communication. Knowing communication techniques to superiors and fellow colleagues is one of the driving factors for increasing professionalism secretaries. Communication ethics is very beneficial for everyone, especially for the secretary in carrying out their functions in the company, namely building harmonious relationships in the internal and external environment of the company. <br>","PeriodicalId":163405,"journal":{"name":"RCRN: Other Organizational Communication (Topic)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121545334","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Using an in-depth longitudinal interpretive case study of an EMR system implementation project, our study shows that the emergence of hybrid practices followed a trajectory marked by two distinct organizational strategies: resistance and cooperation to build hybrid logic. While extant research (viz. Kraatz & Block 2008) have characterized these as distinct options that organizations may take in response to enduring institutional complexity, our study reveals that they may be part of the evolutionary process by which hybrid practices emerge. Our study also shows that the shifts from one set of actions to another along this process are due to critical changes in the structure, governance, and power distribution within the organization. Finally, while most research has focused on the organizational aspects of the hybrid practices, we show that the blended structures are underpinned by material changes i.e., selective coupling and decoupling of systems that are embedded with different logics.
{"title":"Emergence of Hybrid Practices in a Complex Institutional Environment","authors":"A. Yeow","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2334007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2334007","url":null,"abstract":"Using an in-depth longitudinal interpretive case study of an EMR system implementation project, our study shows that the emergence of hybrid practices followed a trajectory marked by two distinct organizational strategies: resistance and cooperation to build hybrid logic. While extant research (viz. Kraatz & Block 2008) have characterized these as distinct options that organizations may take in response to enduring institutional complexity, our study reveals that they may be part of the evolutionary process by which hybrid practices emerge. Our study also shows that the shifts from one set of actions to another along this process are due to critical changes in the structure, governance, and power distribution within the organization. Finally, while most research has focused on the organizational aspects of the hybrid practices, we show that the blended structures are underpinned by material changes i.e., selective coupling and decoupling of systems that are embedded with different logics.","PeriodicalId":163405,"journal":{"name":"RCRN: Other Organizational Communication (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114802619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}