Res Hist Med 2012; 1(1) Although there has been great progress in medical sciences, taking good care of human’s health and treatment of many of diseases satisfactorily are still out of reach. Regardless of having different understanding of the reasons and treatment methods, our new perspective of medical sciences, which is considered the result of the scientic renaissance in Europe in the 17th century by some and the result of Islamic Revolution in the 8th and 9th centuries by others, has not yet helped us to nd cures for a lot of diseases. The theory of growing advances in the history of science which considers all the past efforts effective in the future achievements is not completely consistent with scientic methodology in which the issues related to the growth of science, making theories, principles and new scientic rules are discussed. From another aspect the dominant paradigm during each period of history gives the survival chance to the sentences which are solely consistent with the imposed paradigm framework. Anything inconsistent with the sole of that paradigm is victimized without any undeniable and clear reasons. In one specic ism there are other models in which the prior sentences usually play an important role in the determination of probable accuracy of scientic sentences. Thus it can be inferred that although the prior sentences have always inuenced on the scientic achievements, there are many sentences which have been forgotten in the course of the history regardless of their brilliance. These sentences sometimes nd the chance to revive and struggle with other scientic sentences. Different 1 Archive of SID
Res Hist Med 2012;尽管医学有了很大的进步，但是照顾好人类的健康和满意地治疗许多疾病仍然遥不可及。尽管对原因和治疗方法有不同的理解，但我们的医学新观点，被一些人认为是17世纪欧洲科学复兴的结果，被另一些人认为是8世纪和9世纪伊斯兰革命的结果，尚未帮助我们和治愈许多疾病。科学史上认为所有过去的努力在未来的成就中有效的增长进步理论并不完全符合科学的c方法论，其中讨论了与科学的增长，理论，原则和新的科学c规则有关的问题。从另一个角度来看，历史上每一个时期的主导范式都给那些完全符合其强加的范式框架的句子提供了生存的机会。任何与这一模式不一致的东西都是受害者，没有任何不可否认和明确的理由。在一种特定的c主义中，还有其他模型，其中先验句子通常在确定科学c句子的可能准确性方面起重要作用。由此可以推断，虽然之前的句子一直在分享科学的成就c，但也有许多句子在历史的进程中被遗忘了，尽管他们的辉煌。这些句子有时和与其他科学句子抗争的机会c。不同的1存档的SID
{"title":"To the Reader","authors":"A. Mehdizadeh","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt20h6v2m.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20h6v2m.4","url":null,"abstract":"Res Hist Med 2012; 1(1) Although there has been great progress in medical sciences, taking good care of human’s health and treatment of many of diseases satisfactorily are still out of reach. Regardless of having different understanding of the reasons and treatment methods, our new perspective of medical sciences, which is considered the result of the scientic renaissance in Europe in the 17th century by some and the result of Islamic Revolution in the 8th and 9th centuries by others, has not yet helped us to nd cures for a lot of diseases. The theory of growing advances in the history of science which considers all the past efforts effective in the future achievements is not completely consistent with scientic methodology in which the issues related to the growth of science, making theories, principles and new scientic rules are discussed. From another aspect the dominant paradigm during each period of history gives the survival chance to the sentences which are solely consistent with the imposed paradigm framework. Anything inconsistent with the sole of that paradigm is victimized without any undeniable and clear reasons. In one specic ism there are other models in which the prior sentences usually play an important role in the determination of probable accuracy of scientic sentences. Thus it can be inferred that although the prior sentences have always inuenced on the scientic achievements, there are many sentences which have been forgotten in the course of the history regardless of their brilliance. These sentences sometimes nd the chance to revive and struggle with other scientic sentences. Different 1 Archive of SID","PeriodicalId":164856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on History of Medicine","volume":" 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113952165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：