Pub Date : 2021-05-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_24
C. Charpentier, J. O’Doherty
{"title":"Computational approaches to mentalizing during observational learning and strategic social interactions","authors":"C. Charpentier, J. O’Doherty","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":166589,"journal":{"name":"The Neural Basis of Mentalizing","volume":"9 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117255715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jennifer L. Ray, P. Mende-Siedlecki, Ana P. Gantman, J. V. Bavel
Over the past few decades, two-factor models of social cognition have emerged as the dominant framework for understanding impression formation. Despite the differences in the labels, there is wide agreement that one dimension reflects sociability potential, and the other, competence. One way in which the various two-factor models do clearly differ, however, is in the way the dimensions incorporate or produce evaluations of morality. Aristotle saw morality as the most important basis on which to form positive evaluations, because competence and sociability could only be virtuous, sincere, and trustworthy if expressed through a moral character. This chapter highlights research demonstrating the unique and possibly primary role of morality in social cognition. We clarify the dynamic, interactive, and conjoint effects of morality on social perception, and argue morality, competence, and sociability are three influential and interactive dimensions of social perception.
{"title":"The Role of Morality in Social Cognition","authors":"Jennifer L. Ray, P. Mende-Siedlecki, Ana P. Gantman, J. V. Bavel","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/yzqtj","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yzqtj","url":null,"abstract":"Over the past few decades, two-factor models of social cognition have emerged as the dominant framework for understanding impression formation. Despite the differences in the labels, there is wide agreement that one dimension reflects sociability potential, and the other, competence. One way in which the various two-factor models do clearly differ, however, is in the way the dimensions incorporate or produce evaluations of morality. Aristotle saw morality as the most important basis on which to form positive evaluations, because competence and sociability could only be virtuous, sincere, and trustworthy if expressed through a moral character. This chapter highlights research demonstrating the unique and possibly primary role of morality in social cognition. We clarify the dynamic, interactive, and conjoint effects of morality on social perception, and argue morality, competence, and sociability are three influential and interactive dimensions of social perception.","PeriodicalId":166589,"journal":{"name":"The Neural Basis of Mentalizing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121478027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Humans have a remarkable ability to infer and represent others’ mental states such as their beliefs, goals, desires, intentions, and feelings. In this chapter, we review some of the innovations that have developed in economics, computer science, and cognitive neuroscience in modeling the computations underlying several mentalizing operations. Broadly, this involves building models of how agents infer the mental states of other agents within constrained environments. These models include modules for: representing the goals and desires of an agent (e.g., maximize reward, or minimize embarrassment), inferring the mental states of other agents (e.g., beliefs, goals, desires, intentions, and feelings), and integrating these goals and mentalizing computations to produce optimal behavioral policies to navigate the environment. The mathematical operationalization of these constructs provides a general framework that can be validated by behavior and neural recording techniques and extended in the future by contributions from multiple scientific disciplines.
{"title":"Computational Models of Mentalizing","authors":"B. Gonzalez, Luke J. Chang","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/4tyd9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4tyd9","url":null,"abstract":"Humans have a remarkable ability to infer and represent others’ mental states such as their beliefs, goals, desires, intentions, and feelings. In this chapter, we review some of the innovations that have developed in economics, computer science, and cognitive neuroscience in modeling the computations underlying several mentalizing operations. Broadly, this involves building models of how agents infer the mental states of other agents within constrained environments. These models include modules for: representing the goals and desires of an agent (e.g., maximize reward, or minimize embarrassment), inferring the mental states of other agents (e.g., beliefs, goals, desires, intentions, and feelings), and integrating these goals and mentalizing computations to produce optimal behavioral policies to navigate the environment. The mathematical operationalization of these constructs provides a general framework that can be validated by behavior and neural recording techniques and extended in the future by contributions from multiple scientific disciplines.","PeriodicalId":166589,"journal":{"name":"The Neural Basis of Mentalizing","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133825267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_17
B. Malle
{"title":"The Tree of Social Cognition: Hierarchically Organized Capacities of Mentalizing","authors":"B. Malle","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_17","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":166589,"journal":{"name":"The Neural Basis of Mentalizing","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127168911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_27
BoKyung Park, Minjae Kim, L. Young
{"title":"An Examination of Accurate Versus “Biased” Mentalizing in Moral and Economic Decision-Making","authors":"BoKyung Park, Minjae Kim, L. Young","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_27","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":166589,"journal":{"name":"The Neural Basis of Mentalizing","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130580827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_25
Claudia Civai, A. Sanfey
{"title":"Mentalizing in Value-Based Social Decision-Making: Shaping Expectations and Social Norms","authors":"Claudia Civai, A. Sanfey","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5_25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":166589,"journal":{"name":"The Neural Basis of Mentalizing","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122384213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：