Pub Date : 2024-08-29DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611826
Chiu-Hsiang Connie Liao,Nilay Bakoglu,Emine Cesmecioglu,Matthew Hanna,Fresia Pareja,Hannah Y Wen,Timothy M D'Alfonso,Edi Brogi,Yukako Yagi,Dara S Ross
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification and subsequent protein overexpression is a strong prognostic and predictive biomarker in invasive breast carcinoma (IBC). ASCO/CAP recommended tests for HER2 assessment include immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization (ISH). Accurate HER2 IHC scoring (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) is key for appropriate classification and treatment of IBC. HER2-targeted therapies, including anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates (ADC), have revolutionized the treatment of HER2-positive IBC. Recently, ADC have also been approved for treatment of HER2-low (IHC 1+, IHC 2+/ISH-) advanced breast carcinoma, making a distinction between IHC 0 and 1+ crucial. In this focused study, 32 IBC with HER2 IHC scores from 0 to 3+ and HER2 FISH results formed a calibration dataset, and 77 IBC with HER2 IHC score 2+ and paired FISH results (27 amplified, 50 non-amplified) formed a validation dataset. H&E and HER2 IHC whole slide images (WSI) were scanned. Regions of interest were manually annotated and IHC scores generated by the software QuantCenter (MembraneQuant application) by 3DHISTECH Ltd. (Budapest, Hungary) and compared to the microscopic IHC score. H-scores [(3×%IHC3+) +(2×%IHC2+) +(1×%IHC1+)] were calculated for semi-automated (MembraneQuant) analysis. Concordance between microscopic IHC scoring and 3DHISTECH MembraneQuant semi-automated scoring in the calibration dataset showed a Kappa value of 0.77 (standard error 0.09). Microscopic IHC and MembraneQuant image analysis for the detection of HER2 amplification yielded a sensitivity of 100% for both and a specificity of 56% and 61%, respectively. In the validation set of IHC 2+ cases, only 13 of 77 cases (17%) had discordant results between microscopic and MembraneQuant images, and various artifacts limiting the interpretation of HER2 IHC, including cytoplasmic/granular staining and crush artifact were noted. Semi-automated analysis using WSI and microscopic evaluation yielded similar HER2 IHC scores, demonstrating the potential utility of this tool for interpretation in clinical practice and subsequent accurate treatment. In this study, it was shown that semi-automatic HER2 IHC interpretation provides an objective approach to a test known to be quite subjective.
{"title":"Semi-automated analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry in invasive breast carcinoma using whole slide images: utility for interpretation in clinical practice.","authors":"Chiu-Hsiang Connie Liao,Nilay Bakoglu,Emine Cesmecioglu,Matthew Hanna,Fresia Pareja,Hannah Y Wen,Timothy M D'Alfonso,Edi Brogi,Yukako Yagi,Dara S Ross","doi":"10.3389/pore.2024.1611826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2024.1611826","url":null,"abstract":"Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification and subsequent protein overexpression is a strong prognostic and predictive biomarker in invasive breast carcinoma (IBC). ASCO/CAP recommended tests for HER2 assessment include immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridization (ISH). Accurate HER2 IHC scoring (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) is key for appropriate classification and treatment of IBC. HER2-targeted therapies, including anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies and antibody drug conjugates (ADC), have revolutionized the treatment of HER2-positive IBC. Recently, ADC have also been approved for treatment of HER2-low (IHC 1+, IHC 2+/ISH-) advanced breast carcinoma, making a distinction between IHC 0 and 1+ crucial. In this focused study, 32 IBC with HER2 IHC scores from 0 to 3+ and HER2 FISH results formed a calibration dataset, and 77 IBC with HER2 IHC score 2+ and paired FISH results (27 amplified, 50 non-amplified) formed a validation dataset. H&E and HER2 IHC whole slide images (WSI) were scanned. Regions of interest were manually annotated and IHC scores generated by the software QuantCenter (MembraneQuant application) by 3DHISTECH Ltd. (Budapest, Hungary) and compared to the microscopic IHC score. H-scores [(3×%IHC3+) +(2×%IHC2+) +(1×%IHC1+)] were calculated for semi-automated (MembraneQuant) analysis. Concordance between microscopic IHC scoring and 3DHISTECH MembraneQuant semi-automated scoring in the calibration dataset showed a Kappa value of 0.77 (standard error 0.09). Microscopic IHC and MembraneQuant image analysis for the detection of HER2 amplification yielded a sensitivity of 100% for both and a specificity of 56% and 61%, respectively. In the validation set of IHC 2+ cases, only 13 of 77 cases (17%) had discordant results between microscopic and MembraneQuant images, and various artifacts limiting the interpretation of HER2 IHC, including cytoplasmic/granular staining and crush artifact were noted. Semi-automated analysis using WSI and microscopic evaluation yielded similar HER2 IHC scores, demonstrating the potential utility of this tool for interpretation in clinical practice and subsequent accurate treatment. In this study, it was shown that semi-automatic HER2 IHC interpretation provides an objective approach to a test known to be quite subjective.","PeriodicalId":19734,"journal":{"name":"Pathology Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142260853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-29DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611853
Lorand Lakatos,Ildiko Illyes,Andras Budai,Viktoria Bencze,Attila Szijarto,Andras Kiss,Balazs Banky
Accurate lymph node (LN) retrieval during colorectal carcinoma resection is pivotal for precise N-staging and the determination of adjuvant therapy. Current guidelines recommend the examination of at least 12 mesocolic or mesorectal lymph nodes for accurate staging. Traditional histological processing techniques, reliant on visual inspection and palpation, are time-consuming and heavily dependent on the examiner's expertise and availability. Various methods have been documented to enhance LN retrieval from colorectal specimens, including intra-arterial ex vivo methylene blue injection. Recent studies have explored the utility of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for visualizing pericolic lymph nodes and identifying sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal malignancies. This study included 10 patients who underwent colon resection for malignant tumors. During surgery, intravenous ICG dye and an endoscopic camera were employed to assess intestinal perfusion. Post-resection, ex vivo intra-arterial administration of ICG dye was performed on the specimens, followed by routine histological processing and an ICG-assisted lymph node dissection. The objective was to evaluate whether ICG imaging could identify additional lymph nodes compared to routine manual dissection and to assess the clinical relevance of these findings. For each patient, a minimum of 12 lymph nodes (median = 25.5, interquartile range = 12.25, maximum = 33) were examined. ICG imaging facilitated the detection of a median of three additional lymph nodes not identified during routine processing. Metastatic lymph nodes were found in four patients however no additional metastatic nodes were detected with ICG assistance. Our findings suggest that ex vivo intra-arterial administration of indocyanine green dye can augment lymph node dissection, particularly in cases where the number of lymph nodes retrieved is below the recommended threshold of 12.
{"title":"Feasibility of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence in ex vivo pathological dissection of colorectal lymph nodes-a pilot study.","authors":"Lorand Lakatos,Ildiko Illyes,Andras Budai,Viktoria Bencze,Attila Szijarto,Andras Kiss,Balazs Banky","doi":"10.3389/pore.2024.1611853","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2024.1611853","url":null,"abstract":"Accurate lymph node (LN) retrieval during colorectal carcinoma resection is pivotal for precise N-staging and the determination of adjuvant therapy. Current guidelines recommend the examination of at least 12 mesocolic or mesorectal lymph nodes for accurate staging. Traditional histological processing techniques, reliant on visual inspection and palpation, are time-consuming and heavily dependent on the examiner's expertise and availability. Various methods have been documented to enhance LN retrieval from colorectal specimens, including intra-arterial ex vivo methylene blue injection. Recent studies have explored the utility of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging for visualizing pericolic lymph nodes and identifying sentinel lymph nodes in colorectal malignancies. This study included 10 patients who underwent colon resection for malignant tumors. During surgery, intravenous ICG dye and an endoscopic camera were employed to assess intestinal perfusion. Post-resection, ex vivo intra-arterial administration of ICG dye was performed on the specimens, followed by routine histological processing and an ICG-assisted lymph node dissection. The objective was to evaluate whether ICG imaging could identify additional lymph nodes compared to routine manual dissection and to assess the clinical relevance of these findings. For each patient, a minimum of 12 lymph nodes (median = 25.5, interquartile range = 12.25, maximum = 33) were examined. ICG imaging facilitated the detection of a median of three additional lymph nodes not identified during routine processing. Metastatic lymph nodes were found in four patients however no additional metastatic nodes were detected with ICG assistance. Our findings suggest that ex vivo intra-arterial administration of indocyanine green dye can augment lymph node dissection, particularly in cases where the number of lymph nodes retrieved is below the recommended threshold of 12.","PeriodicalId":19734,"journal":{"name":"Pathology Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142260851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Castleman disease is a rare and atypical lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by diverse clinical manifestations. It has both unicentric and multicentric forms, the latter with further subdivisions, i.e., human herpesvirus 8-associated and idiopathic forms. The diagnosis of Castleman disease is often delayed, as it is rare, and because it shares clinical features with different autoimmune, inflammatory, and malignant lymphoproliferative disorders. The first-line treatment in unicentric form is mainly surgical, while in idiopathic Castleman disease, anti-interleukin-6 treatment is the therapy of choice. In virus-associated diseases, antiretroviral therapy and rituximab are recommended. In Hungary, only a few cases of Castleman disease have been published. This report presents our two decades of experience in the challenging diagnosis and management of this rare disorder, most properly underdiagnosed in Hungary. We provide insights into seven unicentric and five idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease cases, the latter ones especially highlighting the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to the variable and unique clinical features both of patients and diseases, e.g., bronchiolitis obliterans, stage IV diabetic renal failure, anti-HBc positivity, siltuximab treatment period, respectively.
卡斯特曼病是一种罕见的非典型淋巴组织增生性疾病，临床表现多种多样。它有单中心型和多中心型，后者又有进一步的细分，即人类疱疹病毒 8 相关型和特发性型。由于卡斯特曼病十分罕见，而且与不同的自身免疫性、炎症性和恶性淋巴细胞增生性疾病具有相同的临床特征，因此常常被延误诊断。单中心型的一线治疗主要是外科手术，而特发性卡斯特曼病的首选疗法是抗白细胞介素-6治疗。对于病毒相关性疾病，建议采用抗逆转录病毒疗法和利妥昔单抗。在匈牙利，只有少数几个卡斯特曼病病例发表过。本报告介绍了我们二十年来在诊断和治疗这种罕见疾病方面所积累的丰富经验。我们对七例单中心卡斯特曼病和五例特发性多中心卡斯特曼病病例进行了深入分析，其中特发性多中心卡斯特曼病病例尤其突出了诊断和治疗方面的挑战，因为患者和疾病的临床特征各不相同且各具特色，例如阻塞性支气管炎、糖尿病肾衰竭 IV 期、抗-HBc 阳性、硅妥昔单抗治疗期等。
{"title":"Diagnostic challenges in patients with Castleman disease, a single center experience from Hungary.","authors":"Boglárka Brúgós,Zsófia Simon,Gábor Méhes,Árpád Illés,György Pfliegler","doi":"10.3389/pore.2024.1611785","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2024.1611785","url":null,"abstract":"Castleman disease is a rare and atypical lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by diverse clinical manifestations. It has both unicentric and multicentric forms, the latter with further subdivisions, i.e., human herpesvirus 8-associated and idiopathic forms. The diagnosis of Castleman disease is often delayed, as it is rare, and because it shares clinical features with different autoimmune, inflammatory, and malignant lymphoproliferative disorders. The first-line treatment in unicentric form is mainly surgical, while in idiopathic Castleman disease, anti-interleukin-6 treatment is the therapy of choice. In virus-associated diseases, antiretroviral therapy and rituximab are recommended. In Hungary, only a few cases of Castleman disease have been published. This report presents our two decades of experience in the challenging diagnosis and management of this rare disorder, most properly underdiagnosed in Hungary. We provide insights into seven unicentric and five idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease cases, the latter ones especially highlighting the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to the variable and unique clinical features both of patients and diseases, e.g., bronchiolitis obliterans, stage IV diabetic renal failure, anti-HBc positivity, siltuximab treatment period, respectively.","PeriodicalId":19734,"journal":{"name":"Pathology Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142201523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-26DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611809
Uğur Çakır,Petra Balogh,Anikó Ferenczik,Valentin Brodszky,Tibor Krenács,Sarolta Kárpáti,Miklós Sárdy,Péter Holló,Melinda Fábián
Melanoma incidence is increasing globally. Although novel therapies have improved the survival of primary melanoma patients over the past decade, the overall survival rate for metastatic melanoma remains low. In addition to traditional prognostic factors such as Breslow thickness, ulceration, and mitotic rate, novel genetic and molecular markers have been investigated. In our study, we analyzed the expression of G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) and the endodomain of collagen XVII (COL17) in relation to clinicopathological factors in primary cutaneous melanomas with known lymph node status in both sexes, using immunohistochemistry. We found, that GPER1 expression correlated with favorable clinicopathological factors, including lower Breslow thickness, lower mitotic rate and absence of ulceration. In contrast, COL17 expression was associated with poor prognostic features, such as higher tumor thickness, higher mitotic rate, presence of ulceration and presence of regression. Melanomas positive for both GPER1 and COL17 had significantly lower mean Breslow thickness and mitotic rate compared to cases positive for COL17 only. Our data indicate that GPER1 and COL17 proteins may be of potential prognostic value in primary cutaneous melanomas.
{"title":"G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 and collagen XVII endodomain expression in human cutaneous melanomas: can they serve as prognostic factors?","authors":"Uğur Çakır,Petra Balogh,Anikó Ferenczik,Valentin Brodszky,Tibor Krenács,Sarolta Kárpáti,Miklós Sárdy,Péter Holló,Melinda Fábián","doi":"10.3389/pore.2024.1611809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2024.1611809","url":null,"abstract":"Melanoma incidence is increasing globally. Although novel therapies have improved the survival of primary melanoma patients over the past decade, the overall survival rate for metastatic melanoma remains low. In addition to traditional prognostic factors such as Breslow thickness, ulceration, and mitotic rate, novel genetic and molecular markers have been investigated. In our study, we analyzed the expression of G-protein coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1) and the endodomain of collagen XVII (COL17) in relation to clinicopathological factors in primary cutaneous melanomas with known lymph node status in both sexes, using immunohistochemistry. We found, that GPER1 expression correlated with favorable clinicopathological factors, including lower Breslow thickness, lower mitotic rate and absence of ulceration. In contrast, COL17 expression was associated with poor prognostic features, such as higher tumor thickness, higher mitotic rate, presence of ulceration and presence of regression. Melanomas positive for both GPER1 and COL17 had significantly lower mean Breslow thickness and mitotic rate compared to cases positive for COL17 only. Our data indicate that GPER1 and COL17 proteins may be of potential prognostic value in primary cutaneous melanomas.","PeriodicalId":19734,"journal":{"name":"Pathology Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142201522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：