Pub Date : 1998-04-01DOI: 10.14217/9781848597686-8-en
H. Steinberg
Governments are finally recognizing the importance of professional financial management. Revenue bases are no longer growing, governments are expected to provide more programs and the taxpayers want more value. Hence, elected officials are asking the program managers to focus their limited resources on achieving specific results and to consider the financial implications of their program actions. At the same time, they are expanding the role of financial managers and are looking to fill the positions with employees who possess extensive knowledge in a wide variety of functional areas. The Association of Government Accountants' Certified Government Financial Manager (CGFM) program is a response to this call for an increased level of professionalism in government financial managers. The CGFM Program seeks to identify and designate individuals who have knowledge in many functional areas and know how to apply it in a government setting. The designation further recognizes that the knowledge brought to government financial management differs significantly from private sector financial management expertise. The key elements of the CGFM program are the three examinations that have been designed to determine whether an individual has this unique knowledge as defined by the CGFM program. This article explains the comprehensive development of three separate examinations that candidates must pass to become certified as well as the subject matter covered by each exam. DEVELOPING THE EXAMINATION The development of a successful and professionally defensible certification exam must follow a rigorous plan. The process followed during the development of the CGFM exam was defined by the Chauncey Group International, a wholly owned subsidiary of the world-renowned Educational Testing Service. Chauncey guided and participated in every step. The Content Specifications Outline The process started with the development, by the CGFM Professional Certification Board, of a Content Specifications Outline. The purpose of a Content Specifications Outline is to define the body of knowledge to be covered on the exam. This complex effort was undertaken by the Association of Government Accountants' Professional Certification Board. Other purposes for the outline are to establish the foundation from which the exam is developed, assure consistent coverage on the exam over time, communicate the content of the exam to interested parties, aid candidates preparing for the exam and provide information to the designers of exam preparation courses. In the Content Specifications Outline, the board declared what an individual should know in order to perform as a government financial manager. The outline did not, however, include the technical aspects of the various disciplines in which a government financial manager might work. For instance, it did not include extensive aspects of accounting theory, auditing practice or information management. The board concluded that the examinations for ot
{"title":"Improving Financial Management","authors":"H. Steinberg","doi":"10.14217/9781848597686-8-en","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14217/9781848597686-8-en","url":null,"abstract":"Governments are finally recognizing the importance of professional financial management. Revenue bases are no longer growing, governments are expected to provide more programs and the taxpayers want more value. Hence, elected officials are asking the program managers to focus their limited resources on achieving specific results and to consider the financial implications of their program actions. At the same time, they are expanding the role of financial managers and are looking to fill the positions with employees who possess extensive knowledge in a wide variety of functional areas. The Association of Government Accountants' Certified Government Financial Manager (CGFM) program is a response to this call for an increased level of professionalism in government financial managers. The CGFM Program seeks to identify and designate individuals who have knowledge in many functional areas and know how to apply it in a government setting. The designation further recognizes that the knowledge brought to government financial management differs significantly from private sector financial management expertise. The key elements of the CGFM program are the three examinations that have been designed to determine whether an individual has this unique knowledge as defined by the CGFM program. This article explains the comprehensive development of three separate examinations that candidates must pass to become certified as well as the subject matter covered by each exam. DEVELOPING THE EXAMINATION The development of a successful and professionally defensible certification exam must follow a rigorous plan. The process followed during the development of the CGFM exam was defined by the Chauncey Group International, a wholly owned subsidiary of the world-renowned Educational Testing Service. Chauncey guided and participated in every step. The Content Specifications Outline The process started with the development, by the CGFM Professional Certification Board, of a Content Specifications Outline. The purpose of a Content Specifications Outline is to define the body of knowledge to be covered on the exam. This complex effort was undertaken by the Association of Government Accountants' Professional Certification Board. Other purposes for the outline are to establish the foundation from which the exam is developed, assure consistent coverage on the exam over time, communicate the content of the exam to interested parties, aid candidates preparing for the exam and provide information to the designers of exam preparation courses. In the Content Specifications Outline, the board declared what an individual should know in order to perform as a government financial manager. The outline did not, however, include the technical aspects of the various disciplines in which a government financial manager might work. For instance, it did not include extensive aspects of accounting theory, auditing practice or information management. The board concluded that the examinations for ot","PeriodicalId":198136,"journal":{"name":"The Government Accountants Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124141045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1996-04-01DOI: 10.4135/9781412972024.n1853
Katherine Thompson
At some point in recent accounting history, auditing grew from an examination of the fairness of financial statements to auditing the performance of management. The federal government, along with at least 16 states and numerous local governments, are either using or preparing to use performance audits. But what is performance auditing? Sometimes known as an operational audit, program audit or management audit, Government Auditing Standards define a performance audit as: ...an objective and systematic examination of evidence for the purpose of providing an independent assessment of the performance of a government organization, program, activity or function in order to provide information to improve public accountability and facilitate decision-making... The standards go on to say that performance audits include economy and efficiency and program audits. In short, performance audits identify ways government can work better and cost less. By taking a thorough, top-to-bottom look at every operation, performance audits measure economy and efficiency, effectiveness of services and then recommend appropriate changes. Performance audits uncover waste and fraud. Ultimately they change the way government works. What does performance auditing mean to the practicing professional? Here are some definitions provided by leaders in government performance auditing: Gerald R. Silva, CGFM, City Auditor, City of San Jose, California: "From a technical standpoint, performance auditing is compliance review with laws, ordinances, statutes and rules...and the three "E"s--economy, efficiency and effectiveness...But really a performance audit is an audit of management's performance." Kurt Sjoberg, CGFM, State Auditor of California: "A performance audit is an independent evaluation of an organization's operation with an eye toward making it work better, faster and cheaper. Along with these streamlining efforts, a performance audit may also determine whether management is fulfilling its promises to the taxpayers by effectively providing the services intended to meet its goals and objectives." Francis E. Reardon, CGFM, Auditor General, US Army: "A performance audit is a detailed examination and evaluation of the efficiency effectiveness and propriety of an entity's operation...with the goal of providing management with real-time recommendations and assistance that improves operations and processes while saving taxpayers dollars..." Some of the questions a performance auditor might answer are: What is the mission of the activity? Is it still needed? Is management achieving its mission? How does it know it is achieving its mission? Can it be more effective in achieving its mission? Is management achieving its mission as effectively as possible? Performance auditors must make sound, workable recommendations to make government work better for less. But why is a performance auditor any better at making government more effective and efficient than a government manager? According t
在近代会计史上的某个时期,审计从对财务报表公平性的审查发展到对管理绩效的审计。联邦政府,以及至少16个州和众多地方政府,正在使用或准备使用绩效审计。但是什么是性能审计呢?《政府审计准则》将绩效审计定义为:……对证据进行客观和系统的审查,目的是对政府组织、项目、活动或职能的表现进行独立评估,以提供信息,提高公共问责制,促进决策。该标准还指出,绩效审计包括经济、效率和程序审计。简而言之,绩效审计确定了政府可以更好地工作和降低成本的方法。通过对每项操作进行彻底的、自上而下的检查,绩效审计可以衡量经济、效率和服务的有效性,然后建议适当的更改。绩效审计可以发现浪费和欺诈。最终,他们改变了政府的工作方式。绩效审计对执业专业人员意味着什么?以下是一些政府绩效审计领导者给出的定义:Gerald R. Silva, CGFM,圣何塞市审计员:“从技术角度来看,绩效审计是对法律、条例、法规和规则的合规性审查……以及三个“E”——经济、效率和效益……但实际上,绩效审计是对管理层绩效的审计。”Kurt Sjoberg, CGFM,加利福尼亚州审计员:“绩效审计是对组织运作的独立评估,着眼于使其更好、更快、更便宜地工作。除了这些精简工作外,绩效审计还可以确定管理层是否通过有效地提供旨在实现其目标和目的的服务来履行其对纳税人的承诺。”Francis E. Reardon, CGFM,美国陆军审计长:“绩效审计是对实体运作的效率、有效性和适当性的详细检查和评估……我们的目标是为管理层提供实时建议和帮助,以改善运营和流程,同时节省纳税人的钱……”性能审计员可能回答的一些问题是:活动的任务是什么?它还需要吗?管理层是否实现了它的使命?它如何知道自己完成了使命?它能否更有效地实现其使命?管理层是否尽可能有效地完成了它的使命?绩效审计人员必须提出合理、可行的建议,使政府以更少的投入更好地工作。但是,为什么绩效审计员比政府管理者更能使政府更加有效和高效呢?根据《审计管理绩效》一书的作者利奥·赫伯特博士的说法,在审计开始时,审计员“不知道该去哪里,该做什么”。这对于思想开放的绩效审计员来说可能是一个很大的优势。不受程序手册、系统限制和“我们一直是怎么做的”态度的束缚,绩效审核员可能更容易接受有关如何把事情做得更好的想法。经验丰富的绩效审核员有一个巨大的优势,那就是在几年内与更多的组织合作(因此对更多的系统有更好的工作知识),而不是大多数管理人员在职业生涯中所做的。在许多作者看来,绩效审计员更有效的另一个原因是:审计员被安排在组织结构图的外部(或顶部)。与经理不同,审核员的优势在于能够轻松地跨越组织线,包括纵向和横向。…
{"title":"Performance Auditing: What Is It?","authors":"Katherine Thompson","doi":"10.4135/9781412972024.n1853","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412972024.n1853","url":null,"abstract":"At some point in recent accounting history, auditing grew from an examination of the fairness of financial statements to auditing the performance of management. The federal government, along with at least 16 states and numerous local governments, are either using or preparing to use performance audits. But what is performance auditing? Sometimes known as an operational audit, program audit or management audit, Government Auditing Standards define a performance audit as: ...an objective and systematic examination of evidence for the purpose of providing an independent assessment of the performance of a government organization, program, activity or function in order to provide information to improve public accountability and facilitate decision-making... The standards go on to say that performance audits include economy and efficiency and program audits. In short, performance audits identify ways government can work better and cost less. By taking a thorough, top-to-bottom look at every operation, performance audits measure economy and efficiency, effectiveness of services and then recommend appropriate changes. Performance audits uncover waste and fraud. Ultimately they change the way government works. What does performance auditing mean to the practicing professional? Here are some definitions provided by leaders in government performance auditing: Gerald R. Silva, CGFM, City Auditor, City of San Jose, California: \"From a technical standpoint, performance auditing is compliance review with laws, ordinances, statutes and rules...and the three \"E\"s--economy, efficiency and effectiveness...But really a performance audit is an audit of management's performance.\" Kurt Sjoberg, CGFM, State Auditor of California: \"A performance audit is an independent evaluation of an organization's operation with an eye toward making it work better, faster and cheaper. Along with these streamlining efforts, a performance audit may also determine whether management is fulfilling its promises to the taxpayers by effectively providing the services intended to meet its goals and objectives.\" Francis E. Reardon, CGFM, Auditor General, US Army: \"A performance audit is a detailed examination and evaluation of the efficiency effectiveness and propriety of an entity's operation...with the goal of providing management with real-time recommendations and assistance that improves operations and processes while saving taxpayers dollars...\" Some of the questions a performance auditor might answer are: What is the mission of the activity? Is it still needed? Is management achieving its mission? How does it know it is achieving its mission? Can it be more effective in achieving its mission? Is management achieving its mission as effectively as possible? Performance auditors must make sound, workable recommendations to make government work better for less. But why is a performance auditor any better at making government more effective and efficient than a government manager? According t","PeriodicalId":198136,"journal":{"name":"The Government Accountants Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116553730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}