Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy最新文献

英文中文

Evidence and Theory 证据与理论

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-70974-1_17

D. Mcqueen

引用次数: 17

Conclusion 结论

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781108290531.008

引用次数: 0

Money Quantity and Quality 货币数量与质量

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781108290531.006

引用次数: 0

On Writing Roman Economic History 写罗马经济史

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781108290531.002

Keith W. Hopkins

History-writing is a subjective art. The historian is an agent – an individual who selects, arranges, interprets and emplots a series of ‘facts’ within a narrative determined, whether consciously or subconsciously, by ideology. There is a fundamental difference between the past – events which empirically occurred in physical, temporal reality – and what historical theorist Hayden White calls “the historical past” – “a construction and only a highly selective version of the past.” Even the historical ‘facts’ themselves – the building blocks of historiography – are inescapably subjective, even intangible. Neville Morley pithily observes “a fact is a verbal statement, an idea, with no empirical existence outside people’s minds.” Although not all historians are willing to embrace such a deconstructionist or otherwise broadly postmodern dissonance between ‘history’ and ‘the past’, there is broad agreement in the mainstream of the discipline that history-writing is a process of argumentation, interpretation and weighing plausibilities. History-writing, therefore, cannot be called ‘objective’. Not so with many of the theories of modern economics – a result of many developments, but especially the early twentieth century’s distinction between ‘value-free’ (wertfrei) and ‘normative’ economics as well as the widespread adoption of Chicago School economist Milton Friedman’s concept of “positive economics” in the s. Now central within the overarching methodology of modern economics is the idea that economic propositions are ‘testable’ in the same way as scientific statements about the natural world. Economic propositions – accompanied scientificsounding terminology – hold the status of hypotheses which can and must

写历史是一门主观的艺术。历史学家是一个代理人——一个在有意识或无意识地由意识形态决定的叙述中选择、安排、解释和使用一系列“事实”的个体。过去——经验地发生在物理的、时间的现实中的事件——与历史理论家海登·怀特(Hayden White)所说的“历史的过去”——“过去是一种建构，只是一种高度选择性的版本”——之间有着根本的区别。即使是历史“事实”本身——史学的基石——也不可避免地是主观的，甚至是无形的。内维尔·莫利(Neville Morley)简洁地观察到:“事实是一种口头陈述，一种想法，在人们的头脑之外没有经验的存在。”尽管并非所有历史学家都愿意接受这种解构主义或广义后现代主义在“历史”和“过去”之间的不和谐，但在这一学科的主流中，人们普遍认为历史写作是一个论证、解释和权衡合理性的过程。因此，历史写作不能被称为“客观”。现代经济学的许多理论并非如此——这是许多发展的结果，尤其是20世纪初“价值自由”(wertfrei)和“规范”经济学之间的区别，以及在年代广泛采用芝加哥学派经济学家米尔顿·弗里德曼的“积极经济学”概念。现在，现代经济学方法论的核心思想是，经济命题是“可检验的”，就像关于自然世界的科学陈述一样。经济命题——伴随着听起来很科学的术语——拥有假说的地位，这些假说能够而且必须

{"title":"On Writing Roman Economic History","authors":"Keith W. Hopkins","doi":"10.1017/9781108290531.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108290531.002","url":null,"abstract":"History-writing is a subjective art. The historian is an agent – an individual who selects, arranges, interprets and emplots a series of ‘facts’ within a narrative determined, whether consciously or subconsciously, by ideology. There is a fundamental difference between the past – events which empirically occurred in physical, temporal reality – and what historical theorist Hayden White calls “the historical past” – “a construction and only a highly selective version of the past.” Even the historical ‘facts’ themselves – the building blocks of historiography – are inescapably subjective, even intangible. Neville Morley pithily observes “a fact is a verbal statement, an idea, with no empirical existence outside people’s minds.” Although not all historians are willing to embrace such a deconstructionist or otherwise broadly postmodern dissonance between ‘history’ and ‘the past’, there is broad agreement in the mainstream of the discipline that history-writing is a process of argumentation, interpretation and weighing plausibilities. History-writing, therefore, cannot be called ‘objective’. Not so with many of the theories of modern economics – a result of many developments, but especially the early twentieth century’s distinction between ‘value-free’ (wertfrei) and ‘normative’ economics as well as the widespread adoption of Chicago School economist Milton Friedman’s concept of “positive economics” in the s. Now central within the overarching methodology of modern economics is the idea that economic propositions are ‘testable’ in the same way as scientific statements about the natural world. Economic propositions – accompanied scientificsounding terminology – hold the status of hypotheses which can and must","PeriodicalId":198999,"journal":{"name":"Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128588569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Index 指数

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781108290531.010

引用次数: 0

Understanding Money Use and Value 理解金钱的使用和价值

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781108290531.007

引用次数: 0

Embedding Contexts of Roman Money 罗马货币的嵌入背景

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

Pub Date : 2020-03-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781108290531.003

引用次数: 0

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Economic Theory and the Roman Monetary Economy

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀