Cet article présente une réflexion critique sur la situation des mères d’enfants placés jusqu’à leur majorité à la lumière de définitions de la justice sociale. Plusieurs auteurs contemporains placent la reconnaissance de la dignité des personnes au coeur de leur définition, comme le démontrent les écrits d’Axel Honneth, d’Emmanuel Renault et de Nancy Fraser. La conceptualisation de la justice sociale selon ces trois auteurs est sommairement présentée, afin de mettre en exergue quelques-unes de leurs particularités, et surtout, de montrer comment ces définitions peuvent se traduire lorsqu’on examine la situation de ces mères.
{"title":"Regard sur la justice sociale à travers la situation des mères qui ont un enfant placé par les services de protection de l’enfance","authors":"J. Noël","doi":"10.7202/1058482AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1058482AR","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article présente une réflexion critique sur la situation des mères d’enfants placés jusqu’à leur majorité à la lumière de définitions de la justice sociale. Plusieurs auteurs contemporains placent la reconnaissance de la dignité des personnes au coeur de leur définition, comme le démontrent les écrits d’Axel Honneth, d’Emmanuel Renault et de Nancy Fraser. La conceptualisation de la justice sociale selon ces trois auteurs est sommairement présentée, afin de mettre en exergue quelques-unes de leurs particularités, et surtout, de montrer comment ces définitions peuvent se traduire lorsqu’on examine la situation de ces mères.","PeriodicalId":214651,"journal":{"name":"2017 Student Competition","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124570428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Renee Dumaresque, T. Thornton, D. Glaser, Anthony Lawrence
Using a poly-vocal approach, this piece calls for the interruption and interrogation of narrative therapy’s colonial associations (White & Epston, 1990), and the cooption of narrative therapy by psychiatry under the guise of progressiveness (J. Poole, Personal Communication, January 31, 2017). We locate narrative therapy in the neoliberal geography of recovery and marketization, where social problems are coded as individual struggles, personal stories are used as mental health marketing material, and the burden of wellness enables psychiatric governance (Costa et al., 2012; Morrow, 2013; Poole, 2011). Drawing on Sefa Dei and Asgharzadeh’s (2001) anti-colonial discursive framework, critical race theory and its technique of counter-storytelling, Patricia Hill Collins’ (1990) Black feminist thought, and anti-sanist theorizing, we explore the possibility of reimagining narrative therapy for political ends. Throughout this piece, we draw on narrative techniques to move beyond an individual understanding of distress, connecting personal struggles to the broader social and political context. We do this by extending a political lens to the four steps taken in a mainstream narrative approach. We have chosen to use case studies informed by our own lived experiences in order to highlight the potential that we see in narrative work. This approach does not leave narrative therapy unchallenged and we understand that by remaining in a narrative framework housed in social work practice we cannot truly separate our approach from colonial care (Baskin, 2016; Lee & Ferrer, 2014). Rather, we hope to start a critical and transparent conversation that begins to explore the reconceptualization of narrative therapy for the purpose of deconstructing dominant discourses and making any colonial connections visible.
本文采用多声音的方法，呼吁中断和质疑叙事治疗的殖民关联(White & Epston, 1990)，以及精神病学在进步的幌子下选择叙事治疗(J. Poole, Personal Communication, 2017年1月31日)。我们将叙事疗法定位于康复和市场化的新自由主义地理，其中社会问题被编码为个人斗争，个人故事被用作心理健康营销材料，健康负担使精神病学治理成为可能(Costa等人，2012;明天,2013;普尔,2011)。借鉴Sefa Dei和Asgharzadeh(2001)的反殖民话语框架、批判种族理论及其反叙事技巧、Patricia Hill Collins(1990)的黑人女权主义思想以及反sanist理论，我们探索了为政治目的重新构想叙事治疗的可能性。在整篇文章中，我们利用叙事技巧超越个人对痛苦的理解，将个人斗争与更广泛的社会和政治背景联系起来。我们通过将政治视角扩展到主流叙事方法中采取的四个步骤来做到这一点。为了突出我们在叙事作品中看到的潜力，我们选择使用我们自己生活经验的案例研究。这种方法并没有让叙事疗法不受挑战，我们理解，通过留在社会工作实践中的叙事框架中，我们无法真正将我们的方法与殖民护理分开(Baskin, 2016;Lee & Ferrer, 2014)。相反，我们希望开启一场批判性和透明的对话，开始探索叙事疗法的重新概念化，以解构主导话语，并使任何殖民联系可见。
{"title":"POLITICIZED NARRATIVE THERAPY","authors":"Renee Dumaresque, T. Thornton, D. Glaser, Anthony Lawrence","doi":"10.7202/1051105AR","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1051105AR","url":null,"abstract":"Using a poly-vocal approach, this piece calls for the interruption and interrogation of narrative therapy’s colonial associations (White & Epston, 1990), and the cooption of narrative therapy by psychiatry under the guise of progressiveness (J. Poole, Personal Communication, January 31, 2017). We locate narrative therapy in the neoliberal geography of recovery and marketization, where social problems are coded as individual struggles, personal stories are used as mental health marketing material, and the burden of wellness enables psychiatric governance (Costa et al., 2012; Morrow, 2013; Poole, 2011). Drawing on Sefa Dei and Asgharzadeh’s (2001) anti-colonial discursive framework, critical race theory and its technique of counter-storytelling, Patricia Hill Collins’ (1990) Black feminist thought, and anti-sanist theorizing, we explore the possibility of reimagining narrative therapy for political ends. Throughout this piece, we draw on narrative techniques to move beyond an individual understanding of distress, connecting personal struggles to the broader social and political context. We do this by extending a political lens to the four steps taken in a mainstream narrative approach. We have chosen to use case studies informed by our own lived experiences in order to highlight the potential that we see in narrative work. This approach does not leave narrative therapy unchallenged and we understand that by remaining in a narrative framework housed in social work practice we cannot truly separate our approach from colonial care (Baskin, 2016; Lee & Ferrer, 2014). Rather, we hope to start a critical and transparent conversation that begins to explore the reconceptualization of narrative therapy for the purpose of deconstructing dominant discourses and making any colonial connections visible.","PeriodicalId":214651,"journal":{"name":"2017 Student Competition","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125484752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：