The paper is a report on research meant to discover the extent to which the speakers of English and Serbian employ tag questions as communicative strategies for ensuring pragmatic agreement and increasing the tentativeness of a speech act regarding the role of gender therein. This small-scale contrastive research project, largely inspired and founded on the specificities of gendered discourse style as identified by R. Lakoff (1975, 2004), and later discussed by Holmes (1986), Romaine (2003), Talbot (2003), Eckert & McConnell-Ginet (2003) and others, is based on analyzing contextualized question-tagging sampled from a corpus of texts within the journalistic register. The corpus encompasses 100 interviews provided by English and Serbian male and female interviewees from on-line newspapers and magazines. The analysis also addresses such issues as how culturally-conditioned or gender-conditioned tag-question usage is, whether a fixed form of question tagging would be less productive a pattern than the variable form, etc.
{"title":"The Use Of Tag Questions with Male and Female Speakers of English and Serbian","authors":"Vladimir Ž. Jovanović, V. Pavlovic","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2967908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2967908","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is a report on research meant to discover the extent to which the speakers of English and Serbian employ tag questions as communicative strategies for ensuring pragmatic agreement and increasing the tentativeness of a speech act regarding the role of gender therein. This small-scale contrastive research project, largely inspired and founded on the specificities of gendered discourse style as identified by R. Lakoff (1975, 2004), and later discussed by Holmes (1986), Romaine (2003), Talbot (2003), Eckert & McConnell-Ginet (2003) and others, is based on analyzing contextualized question-tagging sampled from a corpus of texts within the journalistic register. The corpus encompasses 100 interviews provided by English and Serbian male and female interviewees from on-line newspapers and magazines. The analysis also addresses such issues as how culturally-conditioned or gender-conditioned tag-question usage is, whether a fixed form of question tagging would be less productive a pattern than the variable form, etc.","PeriodicalId":220184,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Language","volume":"300 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121458655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Spanish Abstract: Este artículo tiene como objetivo introducir la consideración del nuevo campo del análisis crítico del discurso (ACD) como forma complementaria al estudio de la historia. Intenta abordar algunos conceptos interdisciplinares para la Incorporación de este enfoque investigativo de reciente desarrollo, con orígenes en la teoría crítica,la lingüística crítica y el análisis del discurso, al campo de la historia.Se presenta su característica central en la consideración del discurso como acontecimiento histórico, como expresión sociocultural condicionada por las estructuras sociales y de creencia de grupos de poder que dominan sobre otros, haciendo del discurso determinante del contexto social y, a la vez, transmisor de ideologías. Se presentan las prácticas sociales paralelamente a las prácticas discursivas, existiendo una relación dialéctica entre ambas. Las relaciones de poder, dominio, hegemonía y especialmente la ideología son las áreas de trabajo en las que se concentra el ACD y cuyo campo de acción implica el recurso interdisciplinario y ransdisciplinario en áreas como la sicología, la sociología, la economía, la política y la educación (entre otras) relacionándose con la historia para poder describir, interpretar y explicar, a través de los discursos (escritos y orales), las relaciones históricas entre el lenguaje y la sociedad. English Abstract: The objective of this article is to invite the reader to consider the new field of critical discourse analysis (CDA) as a complementary way to the study of history. It intends to approach several interdisciplinary concepts for the incorporation of critical discourse analysis, a relatively recent theoretical and practical approach of discourse analysis based on critical theory, critical linguistics and discourse analysis into history. It centers its focus on the consideration of discourse as an event, a socio-cultural expression conditioned by social structures and belief systems of groups of power acting upon others and conditioning the social context while being the transmitter of ideology. It presents social practices in parallel to discursive ones thereby creating a dialectal relationship between them. The relations of power, hegemony, dominance, and especially, ideology, are the main concerns of critical discourse analysis thereby making room for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary joint efforts to research: psychology, sociology, politics, economics, and education, among a few others are related to history in order to describe, interpret and explain the historical relationships between society and language.
西班牙语摘要:本文旨在介绍对批判性话语分析(cda)这一新领域的考虑，作为历史研究的补充。它试图解决一些跨学科的概念，将这一起源于批评理论、批评语言学和话语分析的新发展的研究方法纳入历史领域。本文提出了话语作为一种历史事件，作为一种社会文化表达，受支配他人的权力群体的社会结构和信仰的制约，使话语成为社会背景的决定因素，同时也是意识形态的传播者。社会实践与话语实践平行，两者之间存在着辩证的关系。权力关系,掌握,特别是意识形态霸权在重点工作领域亚洲其省意味着资源等领域的跨学科和ransdisciplinario心理学、社会学、经济学、政治和教育(除其他外)这个场景与故事,来理解和解释,通过演讲(书面和口头),语言和历史关系的社会。English Abstract:目标of this is to The reader考虑邀请The new条field of critical discourse analysis(订立谅解)作为补充way to The study of history。它的目的是采用几个跨学科概念，将批判性话语分析纳入历史，这是一种基于批判性理论、批判性语言学和话语分析的相对较新的理论和实践话语分析方法。它的重点是将话语视为一种事件，一种受社会结构和权力群体对他人的信仰体系制约的社会文化表达，并在传递意识形态的同时制约社会环境。它展示了社会实践与话语的平行，从而在它们之间创造了一种方言关系。The relations of power, hegemony dominance、尤其是意识形态,则主要关注of critical discourse analysis易行making房间for跨学科and joint力度transdisciplinary research:心理学、sociology, politics, economics and education, politico中others are related to history in order to描述,解释and explain The历史relationships between society and language。
{"title":"Una aproximación interdisciplinar del análisis crítico del discurso (ACD) al estudio de la historia (Approaching Critical Discourse Analysis CDA into the Study of History)","authors":"Jorge E. Benavides B.","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/hjzww","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/hjzww","url":null,"abstract":"<b>Spanish Abstract:</b> Este artículo tiene como objetivo introducir la consideración del nuevo campo del análisis crítico del discurso (ACD) como forma complementaria al estudio de la historia. Intenta abordar algunos conceptos interdisciplinares para la Incorporación de este enfoque investigativo de reciente desarrollo, con orígenes en la teoría crítica,la lingüística crítica y el análisis del discurso, al campo de la historia.Se presenta su característica central en la consideración del discurso como acontecimiento histórico, como expresión sociocultural condicionada por las estructuras sociales y de creencia de grupos de poder que dominan sobre otros, haciendo del discurso determinante del contexto social y, a la vez, transmisor de ideologías. Se presentan las prácticas sociales paralelamente a las prácticas discursivas, existiendo una relación dialéctica entre ambas. Las relaciones de poder, dominio, hegemonía y especialmente la ideología son las áreas de trabajo en las que se concentra el ACD y cuyo campo de acción implica el recurso interdisciplinario y ransdisciplinario en áreas como la sicología, la sociología, la economía, la política y la educación (entre otras) relacionándose con la historia para poder describir, interpretar y explicar, a través de los discursos (escritos y orales), las relaciones históricas entre el lenguaje y la sociedad. <b>English Abstract:</b> The objective of this article is to invite the reader to consider the new field of critical discourse analysis (CDA) as a complementary way to the study of history. It intends to approach several interdisciplinary concepts for the incorporation of critical discourse analysis, a relatively recent theoretical and practical approach of discourse analysis based on critical theory, critical linguistics and discourse analysis into history. It centers its focus on the consideration of discourse as an event, a socio-cultural expression conditioned by social structures and belief systems of groups of power acting upon others and conditioning the social context while being the transmitter of ideology. It presents social practices in parallel to discursive ones thereby creating a dialectal relationship between them. The relations of power, hegemony, dominance, and especially, ideology, are the main concerns of critical discourse analysis thereby making room for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary joint efforts to research: psychology, sociology, politics, economics, and education, among a few others are related to history in order to describe, interpret and explain the historical relationships between society and language.","PeriodicalId":220184,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Language","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133198816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：