Pub Date : 2020-12-08DOI: 10.4337/9781788976688.00009
O. Pollicino
The shift from a concept of the metaphor as an exclusively linguistic phenomenon to a concept that involves a cognitive process and a conceptual framework occurred with the publication of the volume Metaphors We Live By by Lakoff and Johnson in 1980.1 This study marked a genuine paradigm shift, from which research was launched into the role and potential of the metaphor in a wide variety of fields (from politics to religion, from economics to the law, and so on). Two central theses of modern cognitive linguistics were endorsed by the subsequent studies: the idea that language is not autonomous from other human cognitive activities (such as perceiving, reasoning, and so on) and the conviction that there is a close link between meanings and concepts. The fundamental theoretical assumption underlying research into the conceptual paradigm is therefore that the metaphor is more a phenomenon of thinking than of language.2 According to this view, every metaphor has a ‘source domain’, a ‘target domain’ and ‘source-to-target mapping’.3 The metaphorical processes that are developed through shifts from one domain to the other are considered to correspond to the cognitive structures that condition human understanding.
{"title":"Metaphors and judicial frame: why legal imagination (also) matters in the protection of fundamental rights in the digital age","authors":"O. Pollicino","doi":"10.4337/9781788976688.00009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976688.00009","url":null,"abstract":"The shift from a concept of the metaphor as an exclusively linguistic phenomenon to a concept that involves a cognitive process and a conceptual framework occurred with the publication of the volume Metaphors We Live By by Lakoff and Johnson in 1980.1 This study marked a genuine paradigm shift, from which research was launched into the role and potential of the metaphor in a wide variety of fields (from politics to religion, from economics to the law, and so on). Two central theses of modern cognitive linguistics were endorsed by the subsequent studies: the idea that language is not autonomous from other human cognitive activities (such as perceiving, reasoning, and so on) and the conviction that there is a close link between meanings and concepts. The fundamental theoretical assumption underlying research into the conceptual paradigm is therefore that the metaphor is more a phenomenon of thinking than of language.2 According to this view, every metaphor has a ‘source domain’, a ‘target domain’ and ‘source-to-target mapping’.3 The metaphorical processes that are developed through shifts from one domain to the other are considered to correspond to the cognitive structures that condition human understanding.","PeriodicalId":231421,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Rights Protection Online","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123981596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4337/9781788976688.00021
{"title":"Toward an international law approach?","authors":"","doi":"10.4337/9781788976688.00021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976688.00021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":231421,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Rights Protection Online","volume":"217 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134367569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4337/9781788976688.00011
{"title":"The national law approach","authors":"","doi":"10.4337/9781788976688.00011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976688.00011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":231421,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Rights Protection Online","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132960050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.4337/9781788976688.00016
{"title":"Toward a European law approach?","authors":"","doi":"10.4337/9781788976688.00016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976688.00016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":231421,"journal":{"name":"Fundamental Rights Protection Online","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129783417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：